Guided Analysis: “The Age of the Essay”

Using the Makerspace

Be sure you’ve read Paul Graham’s “The Age of the Essay” and the interstitial lecture below:

The Age of the Essay, Updated

Then you will be asked to complete a unique copy of this form:

That is a copy accessible to all. You will be given one through Google Classroom specific to your class. Do not complete the above form for assessment.

This assignment will guide you through some of the later paragraphs of the essay, instructing you to analyze, unpack, and respond to specific quotations and ideas.

You can use the following general feedback to help you:

That general feedback is not a set of correct responses that can be copied; it is a guide to understanding that requires you to put in additional work. It is one tool among many.

Note that one of the questions you must answer directs you to read an interstitial post that is posted alongside your syllabus and introduction to the course:

This, too, is one tool among many. Proceed slowly and deliberately — assiduously, in other words — and ask questions as you go.

The Age of the Essay

If you are looking for the lightly updated version for 2022, click here.

Camille Corot’s “Interrupted Reading” (1870)


Our Approach to Writing


Our writing philosophy in this course is best expressed by Neil Postman:

Writing makes it possible and convenient to subject thought to a continuous and concentrated scrutiny. Writing freezes speech and in so doing gives birth to the grammarian, the logician, the rhetorician, the historian, the scientist — all those who must hold language before them so that they can see what it means, where it errs, and where it is leading.

Over time, that philosophy has led to a universal writing process. Here are the links you need to utilize that process:

The universal writing guide, college essay guide, and Paul Graham’s “The Age of the Essay” are also available in a printed packet:

The universal guide is essential to any writing-based work in our makerspace. Paul Graham’s “The Age of the Essay” is also the textual focus of our writing unit. More on that below.

Overall, except when test prep is necessary, you should read what you write and write what you read. You must understand how an author writes in order to emulate that author, of course, so we are focused on using what we read, not doing what David Foster Wallace described as “the literary equivalent of tearing the petals off and grinding them up and running the goo through a spectrometer to explain why a rose smells so pretty.”

This essay, while focused in part on one particular quarter/class, explains more of what analysis means to us:

View at Medium.com


The Age of the Essay


Here is Paul Graham’s “The Age of the Essay” on his website:

Read this carefully. You aren’t required to annotate the text, but you must understand it. Annotating is one way to do that. Another is to read the essay individually and silently. The collaborative chaos you create on most days is vital, and I think we will always be more inclined to spend our time that way than any other. It’s important, however, that you occasionally let silence into your life, especially while you read. Sometimes you need to sit with your own thoughts, free of distraction, in order to find meaning.

Once you’ve read Graham’s essay, complete the following:

Q&A: “The Age of the Essay”

I might also encourage you to practice interrupted reading with this text. The copy below numbers the paragraphs:

Interrupted reading is what it sounds like: You read a bit, discuss or write about what you’ve read, and then read more. That’s closer to what real-world reading looks like, and it invites others You don’t want to destroy the act of reading, though, which is why you should read the instructional essay on analysis and over-analysis. You need a balance.

To encourage you to get started, here is an excerpt from the beginning of Graham’s essay on essays:

The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusively about English literature. Certainly schools should teach students how to write. But due to a series of historical accidents the teaching of writing has gotten mixed together with the study of literature. And so all over the country students are writing not about how a baseball team with a small budget might compete with the Yankees, or the role of color in fashion, or what constitutes a good dessert, but about symbolism in Dickens.

With the result that writing is made to seem boring and pointless. Who cares about symbolism in Dickens? Dickens himself would be more interested in an essay about color or baseball.

How did things get this way? To answer that we have to go back almost a thousand years…

The complete essay gives you the rest of the history, and then it gives us the philosophy and practicality we’ll need to spend the rest of the school year developing your ability and desire to write.

You should also read Graham’s “A Version 1.0,” which is an interesting look at how he edited and revised “The Age of the Essay” into its published state. Here is a direct link:

Q&A: “The Age of the Essay”


Guided Reading


As you finish reading our essay on essays, focus your analysis and discussion on the following details. Use the comment section here to ask questions, and monitor the comments for my replies and and any feedback from your peers. You will be asked to attach your answers to an assignment on Google Classroom.

¶33 — “Err on the side of the river.” | Break down the river metaphor into actionable language. This is probably the most important metaphor for us in the essay, so make sure it’s clear to you.

¶40 — “At sixteen I was about as observant as a lump of rock.” | This is worth highlighting for a simple reason: You have to be more observant than this, regardless of age. It’s good not to know things, too; that’s the starting place for the next idea.

¶42 — “[T]he more you learn, the more hooks you have for new facts to stick onto — which means you accumulate knowledge at what’s colloquially called an exponential rate.” | Unpack this idea using the next quotation and Graham’s surrounding logic. Again, focus on actionable language — what we can do with this idea.

¶44 — “When it comes to surprises, the rich get richer.” | In context: What does it mean to get richer? How does it connect to writing?

¶45 — “I find it especially useful to ask about things that seems wrong.” | Connect this to the later idea of disobedience. What are you looking for when you search for subjects and approaches for an essay?

¶51 — “Whatever you study, include history — but social and economic history, not political history. History seems to me so important that it’s misleading to treat it as a mere field of study. Another way to describe it is all the data we have so far. | Put this in the context of the entire essay, which you’ll remember starts with a history lesson. Then reflect on your own habits here — your approach to history as Graham describes it, not as a subject in school.


The Main Ingredients


¶38 — “[I]f you want to write essays, you need two ingredients: a few topics you’ve thought about a lot, and some ability to ferret out the unexpected.”

This quotation is separated, under its own subheading, and out of order, so you can focus on it. First, discuss this idea of “ferret[ing] out the unexpected,” connecting it to the idea of “get[ting] deeply enough into it” in ¶39 and “mak[ing] a habit of paying attention to things you’re not supposed to” in ¶53.

Then see what you can do reach back to the start of school, when you got this course’s culinary metaphor:

View at Medium.com

I want you to see how things connect, and I want you to think about how we’re going to approach writing for the rest of the year. Take the time to reflect on this. Analyze your own habits, including what you think about a lot, what you’re “not supposed to” pay attention to, etc., and write some of this insight in the comments here to start an interstitial discussion.

Quick update: Below is an essay that fits this idea of river-writing almost perfectly. It’s also an example of the outside limits of what’s possible in a makerspace like ours. If you have the time, read it, and then fold it into your discussion of Graham:

View at Medium.com

If you want to see what essays in the real world look like, why they matter, etc., start with that.