English 10 GAP Q1B: Added Value

Look up the word provisional, or click here for the definition. Then read on.

Within an hour after this post goes live, you will have provisional GAP scores for Q1B. These scores are low, for many of you, because of missing and incomplete work. A lack of in-class focus led to lower profiles, too.

If you want to raise your scores slightly before the end of the day on Friday, you will have that opportunity. You can demonstrate your amenability, self-awareness, integrity, etc., while producing the kind of evidence that fits higher profiles.

Step #1: Pick new seats. This could be forced on you, but it will be more impactful if you make the decision yourselves. Pick new seats that give you a better chance to focus. You must adjust, because your current seats aren’t helping.

Step #2: Complete the GAP Q1B report posted to Google Classroom. Be honest and specific. You have permission to do this a day early (see our calendar again for a reminder of these assessment dates). As necessary, let the provisional score you’ve been given direct you toward an accounting of mistakes and poor choices.

Step #3: Then write a separate reflection about your use of this space and your approach to our work. Explain what you will do to be successful in the future. Make this meaningful and insightful. Attach it to the Classroom assignment for the GAP report.

Do that, do it accurately and insightfully, and you’ll have demonstrated enough of the skills and traits that matter to raise your profile — and, as a direct result, you will raise that number in the gradebook. For more on how that works, you can read this:

Dürer’s Rhinoceros

AP English GAP 1B: Added Value

Our class period on Tuesday, October 16, asked you to choose between

  1. responding to the morning’s assembly;
  2. reading (again) a post about the end of the writing process;
  3. applying that post to your essay on education;
  4. helping a peer decode and respond to a college application prompt; or
  5. workshopping any or all of that with me.

You even got the seemingly-extemporaneous-but-actually-planned idea of looking into collective nouns and their origins. All that, plus a mention of PaperRater, a site that will give us another way to generate feedback — certainly relevant to our course, since you were also reminded on Tuesday to read (again) the instructional post on how feedback works in our space.

That makes at least eight possible focuses for a 40-minute period. Some options were obviously and explicitly tied into your grade abatement profiles, which take shape tomorrow, but every option would have contributed to your learning to some extent. You know this. You know that every choice counts and that your use of class time is essential to your success — and your grade, if it helps you to think in those terms.

Most of you responded to this freedom well, and I think you are starting to see what is possible in a makerspace. Some of you, on the other hand, made questionable choices. And in a space like ours, at your level, we don’t want to leave anyone behind. Your success is a shared success.

We are going to shift gears slightly next week and slow down this particular vehicle1 in order to focus on the concept of akrasia next week. This will keep us in our study of education. Before that brief unit, you need to reflect on Tuesday’s choices and every other choice you’ve made this month.

For some of you, this will validate your approach. It will illuminate the explicit link between insightful reflection and metacognition and a GAP score of 8 or 9 — which becomes that coveted 95 or 100, if it helps you to think in those terms.

For others, this will raise a lower score by honing your amenability and self-awareness. You will write about you approach this course and what you might do differently to find more success — and to improve your grade, if it helps you, again, to think in those terms.


Your Task


Look up the word provisional. Then look online at the provisional GAP scores posted for Q1B. They will be posted to Infinite Campus after this instructional post goes live.

The GAP report assignment for Q1B is also on Google Classroom. Head there next, load the form, and complete it. You have permission to do this a day early.

Finally, write about your provisional profile, unpacking the language into an honest and insightful essay. Delve into your choices over the last few weeks. Think about your use of this space. Contextualize your actions and reactions.

Do this, because you should always do this, and because doing this will raise that provisional score. What you are seeing, in those scores, is the profile that fits all current evidence. Today and tomorrow, you are adding to that evidence. Your efforts will change the profile you fit. And that gets to one of the most important elements of this kind of assessment: When you work hard, you are always moving forward, and your movement is about growth, aggregate success, and added value. You build toward a profile.

You can ask questions about this opportunity in the comment section below. You will also benefit from reading this:

Dürer’s Rhinoceros


  1. Which is either a Rube Goldberg machine or a siege engine or a strange combination of both. 

Trick-or-Treat for UNICEF

Ishmael Beah describes, in A Long Way Gone, his rescue by members of UNICEF. Students experience the power of that moment through Beah’s account, and it often raises the question of what we should do — what we, in our community, should do when we know there is injustice in the world.

You will have many answers, we hope, as part of our discussions and your writing. One answer, though, is to help UNICEF continue its good work. That is our project:

You will be given your own boxes, which you can use to collect donations for the rest of the month of October. You might give one to a parent to take to work; you could bring one with you to church; with permission, you could even put one in another classroom.

As a class, we will be doing something more. Your teachers will bring in baskets; you will bring in candy and other snacks; and we will create a prize to be raffled off in the high school. There will be one basket per class period, and its quality and draw will depend on what you donate.

We’ll start collecting on Monday, October 15. Bring in candy and other goodie-basket goods. On October 19, the baskets will be wrapped up, decorated, and set aside. The next week, we’ll join forces with Mrs. Juska’s classes and Mr. Looby’s classes to sell raffle tickets down in the cafeteria. Each basket will eventually have one winner, and we will have raised money for a good cause.

We will go over the details of this service project in class. Since you must continue your work on the novel and your burgeoning projects, you should focus on bringing in snacks and treats for the basket; your teachers will set up class time for the baskets themselves.

Keep in mind that we will eventually need students to man the tables down in the cafeteria. Volunteering your time certainly fits some of the skills and traits that matter, so there’s an extrinsic motivation to go with the intrinsic joy of helping others. Here is the sign-up form:

That form is also posted on Google Classroom. You can sign up as early and as often as you like, as long as it is during your actual lunch period or a study hall. Again, there are extrinsic/GAP-driven reasons to do this, not just intrinsic ones.

Ask questions about this project in the comment section here.

Essay Prompt: On Education

Your summer reading included the opening chapters of The Language of Composition, a textbook written specifically for our AP course. Chapter 5 tackles the issue of education, starting with this essential question: “To what extent do our schools serve the goals of a true education?”

In September, you were asked to respond briefly that question. Now, you are asked to develop that answer into an essay.

So the assignment, as an imperative, is: Write an essay that answers the essential question, “To what extent do our schools serve the goals of a true education?”

How you define “essay” is, for the moment, up to you. We will adjust our understanding of the term through exam-based practice essays and a close reading of “The Age of the Essay,” by Paul Graham, which you are welcome to read ahead of time:

An essay, in this case, is a means of framing our exploration of the essential question. It puts your thoughts into writing, invites dialectical discussion, reveals your important biases, and so on. You should submit a copy of your essay through Google Classroom, where you’ll find a copy of this prompt alongside a copy of Chapter 5.

Ask questions about this process in the comment section below. Treat these comments as a chance to engage me in direct instruction, clarification, redirection, etc., while you look for chances to help your peers, too. Questions are usually better than mere observations, although they both have value.

A Long Way Gone: The First Five Chapters

In his essay, “How Teachers Make Children Hate Reading,” John Holt explains his approach to reading as follows:

I don’t want you to feel that just because you start a book, you have to finish it. Give an author thirty or forty pages or so to get his story going. Then if you don’t like the characters and don’t care what happens to them, close the book, put it away, and get another. I don’t care whether the books are easy or hard, short or long, as long as you enjoy them.

Your teachers agree with Holt — to a certain extent, at least — and we want to help you discuss the first 30-40 pages of each novel we read with that quotation in mind. That discussion can be insightful and actionable. It cannot be a simple dismissal of the idea of reading — you have to try — but you will also not be forced past a reasonable point.

In Ishmael Beah’s A Long Way Gone, the first five chapters make up the 30-40 pages suggested by Holt. You must read those first five chapters. We will listen to at least one of those chapters together, letting Beah read his story to us. You will read the rest on your own.


Assignment: Guided Responses


Your assignment is to respond to the first five chapters by answering seven questions. First, answer these two-part questions, being specific about the plot and characters of the novel:

  • What does it mean “to get [a] story going,” and how has that happened here?
  • What does it mean to care about what happens to a character, and which character(s) do you care about so far?
  • What does it mean to enjoy a story, and to what extent are you enjoying this one?

Second, answer the following questions, which are taken from our guide to the reading process:

  • What “range of emotions and events that would take countless lifetimes to encounter” are you experiencing through this reading?
  • How is what you’re reading developing your empathy through “the chance to see things from someone else’s point of view”?
  • How is it helping you reflect on who you are — and the idea that “everyone is a strange and interesting person”?
  • To what extent is it helping you to “see that failure is a part of life”?

In the end, you should have the answer to seven questions. Type those answers in a new document, and then attach a copy of them to the assignment in Google Classroom. Then copy your answers into this Google Form.

This class set of answers will be used to inform discussion and drive our next steps. We aren’t just looking at Ishmael Beah’s story; we are figuring out how you read, what that means for your learning, and where the threshold lies between forcing and inviting you to read.

Ask questions about this process in the comment section below. Treat these comments as a chance to engage your teachers in direct instruction, clarification, redirection, etc., while you look for chances to help your peers, too.

Q1A Data: General Feedback


The Basics: Q1A


Below are simplified spreadsheets cobbled together for your benefit. You need your student number to find your row. In each column, there is a zero (0), one (1), or two (2). This is feedback about the most basic requirements of the assignment or, in the case of in-class focus, the class itself. 2 indicates anything sufficient, consistent, complete, etc., and above. Anything other than a 2 is cause for concern.

Again, this is basic, did-you-do-your-work feedback. Authentic and meaningful feedback is explained in a post you’ve already been assigned. There are plenty of other explanations of how feedback functions in a makerspace. The data in these spreadsheets serves a different purpose. Two notes before we get to that:

  1. First, these notations ignore late work entirely. If you got any of this done before Monday morning around 8 AM, it went into this chart. Anything after 8 AM on October 1 is not indicated here.
  2. Second, these notations don’t include the first revision assignment, nor do they reflect my observations of your use of feedback.

Here are the spreadsheets:


What Should You Do Next?


It’s pretty straightforward: Help yourself, and then help your peers.

To help yourself, find an hour over the next week to enter this conversation online:

Ongoing Discussion: Dunning-Kruger Effects and Imposter Syndromes

To help your peers, find an hour over the next week to enter this conversation:

Ongoing Discussion: Herd Immunity

If you’re interested in doing a little more to help your peers, you should skim this document:

That is a copy of every self-assessment response for the first GAP panel. I’ve removed any identifying information beyond the class period. Since the language is universal, there is a lot of insight to be gained, regardless of age, level, course, etc., provided you read with empathy.

Otherwise, remember what we’ve already reviewed in class as our goals for the week. Here are pictures of the whiteboards in our classroom:

My goal is to give every student the vocabulary to talk about themselves, to advocate for themselves, to analyze themselves, etc., regardless of context. This course will give you that vocabulary, slowly but surely, if you invest in it. It’s the language of all learning. It’s not esoteric jargon. Remember that it connects explicitly to the district’s Strategic Coherence Plan:

That plan is based on everything we know about what colleges and careers demand. These are the skill and traits you need to be successful. Every time you receive feedback, you need to look for a way to hone those skills and traits.

But this is probably the most important takeaway: There’s nothing unusual about what we do in here. We read books, write essays, discuss essential questions, and reflect on our progress. Whether you’re focused on helping yourself or helping others1, that progress starts with an honest reckoning with what you’ve done.

Ask questions about the spreadsheets below.


  1. There shouldn’t be any stigma attached to helping yourself, because that’s how you find the knowledge and understanding to help others. It starts with you. If it becomes selfish or competitive, we can always deal more directly with that. 

Organization: Getting Things Done

From the profile of an INTJ, or “Architect.” Click for the website by NERIS Analytics Limited, which includes a free test and explanation of these personality classifications.

 


Getting Things Done, Part 1


The school year, regardless of course or level, comes down to two elements:

The GAP Process

The Pareto Project: Complete Guide

The GAP process governs our units of study, whether you are an AP student practicing for the exam in May or a tenth grader reading a novel in November. Grade abatement profiles, skills, and traits govern our learning. You receive three profile scores per quarter.

Your personal or community-based projects will be the focus of most Fridays. You’ll be in charge of how you spend that time. Each course will have a calendar that indicates when these projects will be presented and shared, too.

These two elements require you to be organized, and organization is one of the universal skills and traits you need. Load the grade abatement profiles, skills, and traits, and notice that the foundation of your learning is organization. The rest of the components concatenate1, but they can’t be linked together without organization:

This screenshot is from one of the older iterations of grade abatement, and I’m using it to highlight the header:

Above all else:
Explore, create, learn

“Explore, create, learn.” That really is the focus of our work, and when you’re immersed in self-directed writing or putting time into your Pareto Project, it’ll be exciting work. But it’s the much-less-exciting work of organization that gets us into that maker mentality.

You are reading this post because you need to organize the academic stuff you have on you. That word, stuff, comes from a root meaning “to equip,” and that’s the idea: You equip yourself every day in order to deal with school and the work it requires. You gear up.

So you need a frank assessment of how you do that. You need to assess your organization. Divide that assessment into these four categories, and then use our in-class discussions and workshops to improve each one.

① Physical Organization

Start by opening up your backpack or bag, any and all notebooks you keep for your classes, your vintage Trapper Keeper, etc., and then pouring that stuff out onto a table. (That can be a metaphorical act, of course.) Then assess the extent to which you have a system in place. Can you find materials you need? How ordered is your physical stuff? What does it all look like?

② Digital Organization

You probably have a number of tabs open right now, as you read this instructional post. Start there: How do you keep track of what you’re reading and studying online? Do you have a system for organizing those tabs? Then consider specifically your use of Google, especially Google Drive, Google Classroom, and Gmail. Do you have a system of folders in Drive to keep your work clear and accessible? Do you use a system to sort through email? How do you keep track of assignments, announcements, and instructional posts?

③ Schedule Organization

Your schedule overlaps with the first two, but it has been helpful in the past to separate it. Consider specifically your use of a calendar or planner. Do you use the calendar provided for this course? If so, to what extent? If not, how do you organize your days and weeks? How do you keep up with your responsibilities?

④ Mental Organization

This category overlaps with the rest, too, but it helps to isolate it. It is, in essence, about the grade abatement profiles, skills, and traits that direct all of your learning:

The GAP Process

To what extent do you understand the universal skills and traits at the heart of this process? How do you organize your work in here around those skills and traits? Do you use the profiles to map out your work during each GAP triptych panel? What does that learning map look like?

⑤ All Together

Your goal is to find the room for improvement in each one of these organizational categories. To do that, you need accurate self-assessment and observation, discussion with your peers and teachers, and concrete plans for improvement.

If this post is assigned formally, you will be given further directions. You don’t need them, though. You need to test your improvements. You’ll know if they work by putting them into practice.


Getting Things Done, Part 2


As a possibly important sidebar, let’s talk about your personalities. Your self-awareness and sense of self-efficacy are tied to that amorphous idea of “personality,” and you can gain some important insights through simple, online tests.

Start with an introduction to the concept we’ll be using, and then jump right into the test itself:

This isn’t required, of course, but you’re likely to be interested enough in the concept to take the test. It will give you a four-letter code and a detailed explanation of what those letters mean. Once you have the code, either before or while you are reading the explanations, make sure you know what the Forer effect is:

No online test dictates who you are. Understanding the Forer effect is one way to ward off taking these things too seriously. These sorts of tests can help, though, and here is why: When we’re talking about how you organize yourself in here, we’re really talking about you as a whole person. A personality test, especially one as steeped in good research as this one, might be useful, if you are cautious and remember how powerful the Forer effect is.

The idea is not that a personality test is inaccurate or useless. It’s that you must be metacognitively vigilant about anything a website tells you, especially when your goal is self-improvement. I have long thought of myself as an INTJ, for instance, but I see more and more of myself in the description of an INTP these days. I don’t need to take the test itself again; I can read through the differences and apply that knowledge to myself. Since I believe those differences are crucial to my development as a teacher, I have a starting point for meaningful metacognitive discussion and writing.

It’s the same for you. You want a sense of yourself as a whole person:

This kind of self-assessment is organizational because it can generate forward momentum. It can improve the efficacy of other elements of your approach to learning. If you take this online test — or any others; here’s a much lengthier one called the IPIP-NEO that some students have said taught them about themselves — be sure you read all the context and explanation the site provides, keep the warning of the Forer effect in mind, and then do some reflective and metacognitive writing and discussion.

From the profile of an INTP, or “Logician”


  1. Look that word up. I’ve always liked it because it sounds like its definition — like links being clipped together. 

Convergent and Divergent Exercises

Screenshot from the full RSA Animate poster. Click for the whole thing.

In Ken Robinson’s TED Talk on education, he gives this definition of divergent thinking1:

Divergent thinking isn’t the same thing as creativity. I define creativity as the process of having original ideas that have value. Divergent thinking isn’t a synonym; it’s an essential capacity for creativity. It’s the ability to see lots of possible answers to a question, lots of possible ways of interpreting a question, to think laterally, to think not just in linear or convergent ways, to see multiple answers, not one…

There are tests for this. One cod example would be, “How many uses can you think of for a paper clip?” Most people might be able to come up with ten or fifteen. People who are good at this might come up with two hundred. And they do that by saying, “Well, could the paper clip be two hundred feet tall and made out of foam rubber?”

Our makerspace treats reading and writing as acts that require divergent thinking. Literature is, as this video puts it, “a tool to help us live and die with a little more wisdom, goodness, and sanity,” something we “prescribe in response to a range of ailments and classify according to the problems it might be best suited to addressing.” Writing, as probably best expressed by Paul Graham, is our tool for discovering truth and investigating what’s interesting about ourselves and the world around us. Our reading and writing makes up the vast majority of the divergent work we do.

The other kind of thinking that matters (in our classroom and in life) is convergent thinking, which is about finding the right answer to a problem that has only one or two right answers. You’ll find that some of the problems we attempt to solve, whether they come up in class or elsewhere, have a limited set of solutions. There might be a fairly strict set of boundaries, and it’s within those boundaries that you must think creatively and divergently. It’s also within the necessary step of metacognition that you must think creatively and divergently.


The Exercises: Ordeals and Ditloids


This is a two-day exercise in divergent and convergent thinking. It is also a two-day exercise in the following:

  1. Reading flipped instruction in preparation for in-class work
  2. Collaborating effectively during the class period
  3. Analyzing an activity metacognitively
  4. Using the resources of the Internet effectively

The last one is interesting. You could use Google (or Bing, bless its heart) to find the solutions to each of these exercises. You could find a dozen more examples of this kind of exercise, and for each of those, you could find the answers.

That’s entirely by design. At some point, you will always need to rely on someone to give you feedback — to help you when you’re stuck, to verify a correct answer, etc. — and the Internet is usually the proxy for that someone. That device you have gives you access to nearly limitless information, including the responses of any other teacher or student who has done this work.

That makes the divergent question metacognitive: When and why do you look for help? How much time do you give yourself to be frustrated? What are the best solutions to managing these resources, including your peers? How do you process this kind of exercise?

The assignment that will be posted to Google Classroom is straightforward: Submit a copy of some of that metacognitive writing. This is evidence of the most important GAP criteria, of course, but it also helps build the habit of always unpacking your experiences. You should always take a bit of time to reflect on what you’ve learned and to be metacognitive about your choices. As Neil Postman wrote, “[T]he most important thing one learns is always something about how one learns.”

You can do these exercises in any order. That, too, is part of the divergent decision-making process.

The first exercise: “Ordeal by Cheque”

The first exercise is about deductive reasoning. You must piece together a narrative from nothing but a series of scanned checks:

Crue’s story was first published in 1932 in Vanity Fair. It’s interesting that this edition comes from a teaching textbook, since that underscores how many answers you’re going to find online when you get to that step.

You’ll have a hard copy of these pages, and that’s actually where the deductive reasoning will begin. You will be strongly encouraged not to head online until you’ve worked collaboratively, with deductive tools like whiteboards and markers, on a solution. What can you accomplish with just your collaborative reasoning ability?

You won’t be satisfied with just telling the story to each other as you work. You’ll need to write it down. When you search online for other theories, you’ll find fully developed narratives. You’ll want your own for comparison.

The second exercise: 24 Hours in a Day

The second exercise is a ditloid, which is a type of word puzzle that relies on deductive reasoning. From a set of abbreviations, you must determine what common phrase or idiom fits. These exercises are commonly associated with Mensa, the high-IQ society, which I mention only to tell you that IQ scores are overrated in education. You can find many examples of ditloids on a wide variety of subjects. Here is one:

Again, the divergent questions are metacognitive in nature: Will you wait to look up the answers? Will you tackle these alone, or in groups? What are you learning about how you solve problems like these? At what point does your pattern recognition stall or speed up?

 

Use the comment section here to ask questions about the metacognitive component of this work, to share insights into what you and your peers have accomplished, or to post links to the answers you’ve found online. You can even share other ditloids or atypical narratives that were inspired by Crue’s “Ordeal,” if you find them.

Remember, too, that this is part of most student’s introduction to our makerspace, which means you might find yourself interacting well outside of your normal peer group — and that’s a very good thing.


  1. Note: The language has been edited a bit for readability. 

On Going “Paperless”

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7buaXbhWCIvbY6cg/giphy.gif

Papercraft Sisyphus by Karakuri Workshop. Available for purchase here.


Makerspaces, Paper, and the Reading Process


The following quotation informs a lot of what we do, especially through the sentence I’ve bolded:

We may take as our guide here John Dewey’s observation that the content of a lesson is the least important thing about learning. As he wrote in Experience and Education: “Perhaps the greatest of all pedagogical fallacies is the notion that a person learns only what he is studying at the time. Collateral learning in the way of formation of enduring attitudes… may be and often is more important than the spelling lesson or lesson in geography or history… For these attitudes are fundamentally what count in the future.” In other words, the most important thing one learns is always something about how one learns. As Dewey wrote in another place, we learn what we do.

~Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

We’re as interested in metacognition as critical thinking. We’re as interested in why we do what we do as our actual actions. Explanatory posts like this are part of that philosophy. It’s also why we preface everything we read — every novel, essay, poem, etc. — with these:

The first link is to a post that contains the rest of the material. The Lifehacker article and video invite us to discuss how literature helps us; the excerpt from John Holt’s book invites us to discuss how to teach reading; the textbook chapter offers some practical advice for reading; and the instructional post ties it together with a look at types of reading, types of readers, and how it all connects to 21st-century skills.

Fittingly, these prefatory texts also let us talk about why we are a “paperless” classroom. The operative word, paperless, is in quotation marks because it isn’t a strict rule: The intention is to lessen the amount of paper we use and to make much more deliberate use of that resource, not to eliminate paper entirely.

For instance, we need printed copies of Holt’s essay, “How Teachers Make Children Hate Reading,” because we’ll use it to practice close reading. That is once again about how we learn — the kinesthetic aspect of annotating and interacting — as much as the subject matter. With only a few exceptions, this is also true of all of our central essays, short stories, novels, etc., because of the need to practice close reading.

The video on the importance of literature can’t be printed, of course. The Lifehacker post introducing it could be printed, but there isn’t much benefit to that; watching the video is a screen-dependent activity, and even annotation would start with what we see online.

The idea of going paperless helps us most with instructional posts, like the organizational one for the reading process and, more critically, the post on adopting a new approach to reading. Printing either of those would require you to go back online to click links and fill in the required contextual information while reading. That isn’t to say that there’s no point in printing. I almost always need a printed copy of what I read to mark up. That’s the habit I’ve developed. Anyone who benefits from a physical copy should print whatever they want to print. As a rule for the general student, however, printing an instructional post is unnecessary. These are interstitial and interactive posts.

It would be like printing the New York Times article included in “Well, Why Read?” That article has a half-dozen necessary hyperlinks. You’ll get the central idea of the article, of course, and be able to respond to it just fine; but you will be missing critical information, and you will have created a series of extra steps. You’ll have to go back online to click on those links. That can be done, but it needs to be done deliberately, not as our default.

As another example, consider the course syllabi. As of 2018, instead of a paper document, each syllabus is an interstitial and interactive post that invites students to revisit its ideas throughout the first few weeks and even months of the course. Printing those syllabi would require us either to strip out a lot of important information, print dozens of extra pages from those hyperlinks, or require students to go online, anyway, to click on related links and videos and so on.

The most important reason to go paperless is to allow us to update documents quickly and easily. Changes to a calendar, for instance, can create confusion if there is a printed version out there already, which is what happened in the first few weeks of 2018. I printed the calendars for all students to give them something to put in their notebooks. Less than 24 hours later, an opportunity arose that required us to begin our first novel in 10th grade two weeks early. My co-teacher and I shifted a couple of units around, but that printed calendar was made immediately irrelevant.

A paperless approach encourages students to keep their own calendars. It encourages planners and digital to-do lists and all sorts of other techniques for personalized organization. That independence is a necessary step, too.

Another example of the need to keep online content flexible takes us back to that post on the reading process:

The Reading Process

That is meant to be used repeatedly in the future, but its first posted iteration was on September 18. I made photocopies then to help students transition to paperless instruction. By September 20, I saw the need to add an entire section to the post — the third section, “What to Read,” which details the value of Medium’s curated reading lists and the power of the network of sites in Gizmodo Media Group. That was a quick edit online; it would take a few days to reprint updated copies.

Going paperless has been a journey of sorts for me, and I would invite anyone interested in that to read here:

View at Medium.com

This is the way of the world, and it isn’t a step backward. There’s no need for a dire jeremiad. Online and offline reading create a balance, if we approach both metacognitively and purposefully. Nothing will ever replace the feeling and experience of flipping through a novel, and there isn’t anything quite like printing out an essay and interacting with it; the world now talks to itself, however, in interstitial and online ways. Students have to learn to engage with that world.

And, of course, it’s a process. I’ve been working toward a “paperless” classroom for years now, and I still have entire bookcases filled with handouts. I find a half-dozen copies left behind every day by students. I recycle reams of the stuff every quarter. The hope is that the need for a bit of conservation continues to dovetail with the 21st-century skills we know matter most. If that remains true, going paperless – or “paperless,“ with liberal use of air quotes – is a necessity.

The Pareto Project

NOTE TO CURRENT STUDENTS (9/14/18): We won’t be starting these projects until October 1, but I need the post online for organizational purposes. Set it aside until it’s necessary.

Cover art to DJ Signify’s Sleep No More. Listen to “Kiddie Litter,” featuring Sage Francis, here. That song underscores, in a dark and surreal and imagistic way, the idea of being anaesthetized. Compare it to “Take Me Home,” by Brother Ali, which is a song about creating things and feeling pretty good about doing that.


Something Completely Different


This project is built on the “Genius Hour” framework, which you can read about here. It continues to evolve, showcasing the strengths of the classroom makerspace: the willingness to iterate, refine, and evolve an idea; the sense to reboot that idea when necessary; the openness to feedback of all kinds. Search this site for “Pareto Project,” and you can see the long arc of it.

The best place to start, however, is with testimonials and student work:

That showcases what is possible through these projects. And for each student, it will be projects, plural — one personal, one community-based, with the flexibility to expand and contract those projects as necessary.

Here is the guide to a successful Pareto Project:

Use the PDF if you have any formatting issues with the Google Docs version. When you open the document, you should notice the many hyperlinks, which indicate that this is designed to be read online, interstitially, with an opportunity to ask questions and research answers at your own pace. You can (and probably should) print individual pages, however, to help you workshop some of the steps.

This project is probably the best example of what a Humanities makerspace produces, because it frames the project with metacognitive writing and collaborative experimentation. It’s a prime example of how to unlock the real course. Take advantage of it.

Note: With some time and a lot of coffee, I hope to get a fully converted version of the guide online as an interactive post. This will be updated when and if that happens.