Search Results for: pareto project

RE11: Mid-May Updates

Carefully read the updates below. Ask questions in the comment section.


Regents Exam Prep


The most recent Regents Exam available from the state was assigned to you, in full, on April 29. It has been prioritized in class since then. As of May 14, all of you have finished Part 1 and entered your multiple-choice answers in the appropriate Google Form. You should be finishing your responses for Part 2 and Part 3.

Here are the instructions, pulled directly from the instructional post:

JAN. ’18 ELA EXAM: PART 2

Jan. ’18 ELA Exam: Part 2 | https://goo.gl/forms/Qd96mHQacYBieUy73

This is the source-based argument. You’ll need to type your handwritten response, and then you have some metacognitive analysis to complete.

JAN. ’18 ELA EXAM: PART 3

Jan. ’18 ELA Exam: Part 3 | https://goo.gl/forms/V61DNFuFN4wdQdei2

This is the text-based analysis. You’ll need to type your handwritten response — remember, it’s not a full essay — and then complete a bit of metacognition.

Get these writing responses done immediately. You have had two weeks; you’ll have only two hours or so on the day of the exam, once you finish Part 1.

We will use the data you generate to design lessons on particularly difficult questions. That’s why you are entering your responses. For Part 1, for instance, it leads to a spreadsheet:

That’s a randomized sample from all classes. You can see that certain questions, like Question 23, had more incorrect answers. (Green indicates correct responses.) That shapes what we focus on in class.

The same thing is possible with the essays and short responses, but you first need to write them, revise them, and post them to Google Forms.


GAP Scoring


The last three weeks have seen a couple of deaths in my extended family, a move to another state, and a bit more of the most disruptive stuff life has to offer. That’s why GAP scores aren’t yet finalized for Q4A. Q4B ends Friday, so you’ll receive both scores around the same time.

Changes to the GAP report:

  • There will be an offline version available. Here it is as a PDF.
  • The online version no longer requires any analytical writing.

You are still strongly encouraged to do the now-optional analytical writing (It is the only way to justify high profiles and one of the best ways to improve low ones. I’m making it optional to speed up the reporting process: If you neglect these paragraphs, that’s evidence enough of a lower profile.))

If (when) you sit down to analyze your progress, do it having studied the form in advance. Here it is again in offline form:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F05%2FGAP-Report-Offline-Template-Google-Forms.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=500px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

The online version will be posted to Google Classroom on Thursday.


End-of-Year Work


By the end of this week, you will shift your focus away from test prep and onto a couple of end-of-year assignments. This is the good stuff. We will circle back to the Regents Exam, but not in class; instead, you’ll do a kind of triage through Castle Learning. In class, you’ll be splitting your time two ways.

First, we will finalize this year’s work on your Pareto Projects. We’ll talk details in person. I’ll also post more directions toward the end of the week. It looks very much like we’ll be able to use the iLC and some space online to showcase your accomplishments.

Second, we will look back on your writing. This will be a bit like compiling a writing portfolio, but you will be encouraged to stretch your focus beyond this year. The simple goal will be to write reflectively and metacognitively about your growth as a writer; the more complicated goal will be to make sense of the last decade, give or take a few formative years, of your writing life.

Start thinking about how you will spend the three weeks from May 21 through June 11 in those terms:

  1. You’ll finish up this year’s work on your Pareto Project.
  2. You’ll complete a writing life retrospective.

This is why it is so essential that you complete the practice Regents Exam, including the revision and reflection work, as soon as possible. That will free us for more authentic learning.

If you have any immediate questions, ask them below. We will be fine-tuning these plans all week, though, so there is no rush.

AP11: Penultimate Shifts

Another potential metaphor for us: The blobfish, when removed from the pressure to which it is accustomed, explodes a little bit. This is the much-less-horrifying plush version.


Your AP Exam


48 hours from now, you’ll be on the other side of the hadal pressure of the AP exam. Very few of you have typed up the free-response practice assigned a while back, which means I had little to give feedback to this weekend. That shifts your focus for these next 48 hours, because

  1. it might not be all that helpful to write three essays, revise three essays, and then write another three essays1; and
  2. it will be a bit harder for me to give you much individual feedback on those essays once we’re inside 24 hours until the exam.

Instead of writing and revising, focus on decoding the prompts and brainstorming approaches. Do outlines. Only write and revise responses if you know that will help you.

Doing the multiple-choice is still valuable, if you haven’t done it yet. Find an hour. Otherwise, study the glossary of terms and review the format of the test. Here’s the glossary work again:

Copies are in Room 210. They actually have some utility beyond the exam, but not much. As the last post suggested, you might also benefit from reading over the summer reading:

That folder contains other review material, too. Reading now helps. Writing, less so.


About the Multiple-Choice


The 2017 exam was assigned on April 29. It was due on May 4. Then it was prioritized in class from May 4 through May 11. As of May 14, however,

  • only 16 of 29 students in P2 had entered their Section I answers; and
  • only 14 of 26 students in P9 had entered their Section I answers.

Some of that is due to apathy and poor self-control; much of it is due to anxiety, pressure, and burnout. Whatever the cause, 45% of you didn’t enter the data necessary for us to work together2

I’m going to send you notes on the nine most pressing questions from Section I, based on the 55% of you who did the work:

  • Most critical: 5, 39, 53
  • Others: 18, 19, 35, 36, 37, 47

That will be posted tomorrow, when there are no other AP exams but this one in front of you.


GAP Scoring


The last three weeks have seen a couple of deaths in my extended family, a move to another state, and a bit more of the most disruptive stuff life has to offer. That’s why GAP scores aren’t yet finalized for Q4A. Q4B ends Friday, so you’ll receive both scores around the same time.

Changes to the GAP report:

  • There will be an offline version available. Here it is as a PDF.
  • The online version no longer requires any analytical writing.

You are still strongly encouraged to do the now-optional analytical writing (It is the only way to justify high profiles and one of the best ways to improve low ones. I’m making it optional to speed up the reporting process: If you neglect these paragraphs, that’s evidence enough of a lower profile.))

If (when) you sit down to analyze your progress, do it having studied the form in advance. Here it is again in offline form:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F05%2FGAP-Report-Offline-Template-Google-Forms.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=500px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

The online version will be posted to Google Classroom on Thursday.


The Good Stuff


By the end of this week, you will shift your focus away from test prep and onto a couple of end-of-year assignments. This is the good stuff. We will circle back to the Regents Exam (in all its ignominious glory), but not in class; instead, you’ll do a kind of triage through an online practice test.

First, we will finalize this year’s work on your Pareto Projects. We’ll talk details in person. I’ll also post more directions toward the end of the week. It looks very much like we’ll be able to use the iLC and some space online to showcase your accomplishments.

Second, we will look back on your writing. This will be a bit like compiling a writing portfolio, but you will be encouraged to stretch your focus beyond this year. The simple goal will be to write reflectively and metacognitively about your growth as a writer; the more complicated goal will be to make sense of the last decade, give or take a few formative years, of your writing life.

Start thinking about how you will spend the three weeks from May 21 through June 11 in those terms:

  1. You’ll finish up this year’s work on your Pareto Project.
  2. You’ll complete a writing life retrospective.

Add a footnote about Regents Exam triage, too, but focus on three weeks or so of authentic, makerspace-infused work.

If you have any immediate questions, ask them below. We will be fine-tuning these plans all week, though, so there is no rush.


  1. The lesson, as always, is about organization: The more organized and prepared you are, the better you’ll do. Procrastinating only works when the process isn’t all that important. That’s often the case, unfortunately, but not when it comes to test prep in a course like ours. Spamming a lot of prep work in the hours before the exam will just exhaust you. 

  2. This is why we started the year with a focus on self-control and akrasia, talked frankly about blame, and continue to emphasize accountability and self-efficacy. 45% of you didn’t meet expectations. For the free-response section, the time required to write and then to revise might pose a problem, even across two weeks of steady in-class focus; there really isn’t an excuse for this multiple-choice work to go unfinished. You know the metaphor about shooting oneself in the foot? You’ve murdered your feet like they are Rasputin and you’re his assassins. It’s brutal. 

A Not Inconsiderable Amount of Feedback

In honor of the snowfall on April 6. Click for more snowman antics from Calvin and Hobbes.


Justifying 6200+ Words


When I’m asked about the need to make instruction and feedback interstitial — to spend Saturday morning with a pot of coffee and keyboard, like I have here — I think of days like April 4, a Wednesday, which was one of three days added to the calendar after we used up all of our allotted snow days. It was also a day with pretty low attendance:

Those are the numbers for each class on April 4. 37 different students missed class that day. That’s more than ¼ of the total roster. Thursday and Friday were the same, and this doesn’t include students who were late, sometimes significantly, or who left early.

When I write to students, it circumvents all of those problems. It gives everyone a chance to access deep, meaningful feedback at any time, from anywhere, with total transparency. When hard data are included — like the spreadsheets embedded later — there is a chance to self-assess and adjust even more. No aspect of it is wholly dependent on the unpredictable personal and environmental parts of a high school.


Background, or What You Should Have Read Two Weeks Ago


The following instructional and feedback post led to a lot of good student feedback. Here is the post, which absolutely needs to be read in full before you proceed:

Verbing Weirds Language

I’m going to walk you through quite a bit of what students had to say, because I want you to see what your peers are thinking alongside my responses. It’s all much more valuable when it’s transparent and accessible to the entire group.


Under the Hood


We’ll start with some constructive criticism:

For this GAP period you decided to put everyone’s GAP scores up on classroom. It was made as anonymous as it could be because it was done by student id and it wasn’t in alphabetical order. I still found this incredibly rude though because now everyone can see everyone’s scores. I think a grade should be something that is private between a student and a teacher and if the student feels comfortable enough to share their grade then they can. Now, student know that someone got a 3 or a 4 on their GAP profile and will now start to speculate on who that was, causing rumors to start. And imagine how badly the person who got a 3 or 4 must feel after seeing that people in their class got a 9 or 8. They might see that they did as much as someone who got a higher score but the quality of their work wasn’t as good as that other persons.

This is why I didn’t post those under-the-hood scores until now, right before the last quarter of the year. Some of you needed the reminder: Every choice you make is significant. But I don’t want you to be embarrassed. Of course not. I want to help you confront the idea that what you see in your own work and growth might not be accurate — because our sworn nemesis, the Dunning-Kruger effect, is always lurking.

If you walk away from our classroom with nothing else, I hope it’s a sense that you and you alone control whether you avoid that:


Self-Awareness and Self-Efficacy


I flipped numbers to give some of you a chance to grapple with your actual performance. The post on the process — read it again here — is clear about how feedback is embedded in everything we do, which makes these numbers redundant for anyone paying attention. It also emphasizes the need for herd immunity — read that essay again, too — since you should be empathetic enough to your peers to want to help them.

Here is a student who didn’t complete a lot of work for the first two-thirds of the third quarter:

I like this approach you did to explain how you arrived to the grad you gave, and I am one of the people who didn’t do that well, which should say something. It showed us what really goes isn’t the grading, and showed the difference between the people who actually put in the effort to get an 100, and those who didn’t (like me). This actually really help show me what I can do to improve in this course.

I am quoting her for a specific reason: She’s actually being too hard on herself. It’s not always about a lack of effort, and it’s not always about the delusions of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Sometimes, it’s about recognizing that real life — never to be confused with the Sisyphean landscape of school life — can interfere with our ability to get work done. When that happens, as it did with this student, admitting to it isn’t capitulation or weakness; it’s the most sane and rational response.

In other words, you all deserve to be human beings, and often human beings are overwhelmed and overcome by things outside our control. So we work on hacking the impact real life has on your school work, usually by targeting metacognition and the more therapeutic aspects of reading and writing.


Correlation and Causation


As always, you need to know how to read data to reach the right conclusions. One student had this to say:

When looking at the AP11 P2 GAP Q3A+Q3B some people have 7+ assignments missing throughout the quarter yet still come out with an 8 and kids that have handed in all the assignments come out with 5+. After seeing this chart im confused as to how the grading policy works because I feel like it can’t be based off how many assignments that you hand in. I was not surprised with my GAP score and was happy with it but I can see why some people were not, looking at the chart it makes no sense.

Again, the original post covers all this in significant detail. You can’t just look at the chart; you have to look at the explanation, too. If you take data at their most superficial level, you will make mistakes in reasoning and understanding. Correlation isn’t causation.

In fact, take a break from this post to visit this site about spurious correlations:

You have to keep an open mind about what you think you know.


What You Put into It


The most important thing that last student highlights, however, is that GAP scoring “can’t be based off how many assignments that you hand in.” That’s correct. It’s not enough to hand in work. You have to meet the criteria for a profile, and those criteria are far more about growth, collaboration, self-awareness, amenability, etc., than they are about checking assignments off a list.

If there’s a lesson in flipping these numbers, that’s probably it: The system is a bit complicated, but it’s fair and transparent and consistent in its expectation that you do more than just the bare minimum. You get out of your education what you put into it, for the most part, which is exactly why someone handing in poor work might fit a lower profile than someone doing exceptional, individualized work.

But the individualized work is the exception. Many students will complete just the formal assignments, because that’s where the most accessible learning opportunities are embedded. You should do what you’re asked to do. That’s not different from any other aspect of school.


Decoding the Data


More student thoughts on that flipped set of data, feedback, and direction:

I think this chart could be a helpful tool throughout our GAP periods and that we should have access to a diagram like this, not just at the end of the GAP displaying our scores, but throughout the whole gapping period so that we are given a chance to fix and make up assignments before the GAP is over and it is too late.

This is from a student who put herself down as an 8 and probably fits a 9 — and I only say “probably” because I am still going through evidence as I type this.

Here’s another insight1:

The aspect of the post that I found the most intriguing was the way in which the information was presented to us, almost in a type of code. Therefore, if we cared enough to know what those numbers meant, it became our responsibility to decode the charts on our own, which wasn’t much work at all, as we simply just had to use our brains and digest the writing which followed.

That’s exactly it. You had to decode the feedback. The struggle — which, as this student notes, isn’t really a struggle, not if you are paying attention — teaches you how to decode, helps you grapple with close reading, encourages you to think critically, etc., and serves, therefore, as a microcosm of interstitial instruction and feedback overall.


Rock Bottom


If necessary, force yourself to write responsively to what you’re studying, and do it often. Skill and understanding will come with repetition. Meanwhile, you’ll generate enough evidence to earn a higher profile.

Here’s the same idea from another perspective:

Today I took a good look at the spreadsheet that was made for us individuals to really look at what I was doing. The whole idea with the spreadsheet really helped open my eyes to a lot. It made me realize my time management is terrible. For the majority of the assignments, I had a bolded number. It made me realize that I need to be more responsible and consecutive with my work. I need to turn many thing in way before the deadline. Also, I noticed that I only had one Rubicon point, which gave me a bit of a sigh of relief. It shows to me, that my teacher has noticed, I try my best to stay on track and be focused with whatever is going on in the class. Another thing that the spreadsheet has opened my eyes up to is my actual work quality. Seeing all the one’s or two’s really hit me hard. Going back to another post on Sisyphean High from a while ago that I really related to, I hit rock bottom. Seeing numbers for every assignment shows, my work isn’t where it should be. Now, after analyzing everything, I feel more inclined to try harder. That means, getting assignments on time and really diving into every instructional post that is given to me.


Akrasia, Back Again


This next excerpt is specifically about an AP class, but the idea that everyone should, at least, complete all assignments is a universal one:

Personally, I liked the way the GAP scores were displayed this quarter. It was nice to have some feedback as to see what I was missing, and how many assignments I have submitted in each catergory. For my one catergory that was a 0, I was able to understand what I was missing and how it was effecting my GAP score, when before I didn’t realize I was missing it. I noticed some of my peers commenting on how they didn’t like the way it was arranged and how there was so much emphasis on a number. I agree that its disapointing that in high school our education is measured by a number, however that is just how it is. It is impossible in my opinon to have a class without any sort of grade ever. Although there are exceptions, most teenagers would take advantage of that and not have any motivation to do anything. It would be treated like a study hall and not be effective. In addition, it was interesting to see the other grades in our class. Without knowing who they are, we can see the environment around us. I was very surprised at the number of lower grades in the class. I would assume everyone who takes AP Lang, is going to do the work given at least. In addition, looking around the class it seems as most people are on task everyday. This just goes to show how decieving people can be, and why grades are necessary somewhat.

That idea of “how deceiving people can be” is interesting. I don’t think there is real malice in the deception, but it is a conscious choice — or, at least, a choice made despite knowing the consequences. It’s a bit different from the Dunning-Kruger effect, which is about the perceived quality of the work.

This is akrasia again. Revisit this older post and its threat of flying guillotines for a reminder:

The Fatal Flying Guillotine


Slashing Canvases


Flying guillotines haven’t been our only metaphor, and I tried to come up with a less violent one in this post. It ended up with knives and slashing, of course. Students had their fair share of reactions:

I like the idea of thinking how for each GAP period we are a blank canvas and we get a chance to start over and change our ways. However, I don’t like the idea of how one wrong thing and the canvas is ruined. I think as students we are human and we aren’t some perfect robots that don’t make mistakes or get distracted. I think the analogy should be more of we are a blank piece of paper and when we mess up it gets a mark. But, that mark can easily be erased as it was drawn on there. I don’t like the fact that if we do one wrong thing we are ruined and there’s nothing we can do to fix it. It’s unfair and unrealistic. This is the only class where what we do during class time effects our grade. In every other class its if the work is completed then you get a good grade. In here I do above and beyond what is needed for a good grade but if I slip up in class once, my whole canvasis ruined. I dont think thats right at all. We’re real people not just a canvas and we make mistakes but that shouldn’t mean we are ruined entirely.

Like all metaphors, this one helps clarify an aspect of what we do, but it has its limits. Think of it more in terms of the act of destruction: If you make a mistake while drawing or writing, you might be able to erase it; if you make a small mistake while painting, you might be able to paint over it; but if you take a knife to the canvas, you’re going to need to start over.

Even then, that’s the key: starting over. No one is “ruined” by mistakes in here, and every three or four weeks, you can set aside even the most serious mistakes. You can start over.


We Are What We Repeatedly Do


It’s not true, by the way, that “[t]his is the only class where what we do during class time [a]ffects our grade.” What you do in class contributes to most of your grades to some extent. In Physical Education, it’s dressing or participating, but that’s the obvious one; less obvious is that you often receive classwork or participation grades. You’re assessed formatively all the time. It’s part of the DNA of this district now.

I think what this student is identifying is that most classes give you a heads-up before a grade — a bit of forewarning, like knowing that you have a seminar or an in-class lab or station work.

But that’s just it: In here, you have just as much forewarning. You know exactly what you have to do, each and every day. You have had around ten different calendars, tailored to your needs and updated whenever necessary — and they cover every day of the entire year:

That’s just the most recent update, which covers April, May, and June. It’s posted to the main website, shared over Google Classroom, and tacked to the bulletin board by the door to our room.

I’ve even added your skill- and content-based goals for each assessment panel. You have the flexibility of meeting those goals according to your own strengths, but you have the guiding focus of knowing exactly what’s happening.

Most importantly, the expectations for staying on-task and the penalties for failing to do work have been clear since September. You are surrounded by the posters every day.


Nothing Is Ever Ruined


Still, you’re not “ruined” by small mistakes, and certainly not by one mistake, as that student fears. If one mistake could devastate you, just a little more than 100% of you would be devastated. It’s human nature.

Read the feedback and guides to this carefully, and note that it is always about patterns of behavior or massive, impossible-to-ignore choices. In other words, you are always given plenty of chances and a sizeable benefit of the doubt.

If you are chatting with a peer for a few moments before starting an assignment, that’s okay. If you take out your makeup during a practice essay and spend five minutes adjusting your eyeliner, that’s obviously not okay. If group discussion gets off-topic here and there, that’s to be expected. If you barely register that the discussion has a topic, that’s not good. If you hand in a few assignments late, but we’re in constant communication about it, that’s probably fine. If your work is always late or missing, that’s somewhere south of fine.

There are levels to this. I’m encouraging you to experiment, so you can mess up as many canvases as you like, especially if you are trying to do something interesting. If you take a knife to that canvas, however, you’ve made a different sort of choice. And if you slash one canvas, get a second one, slash that one, and then are told, “Stop slashing these canvases, please,” then you need to stop.


It Can Feel Inhuman


There’s a cost to this approach, since we remain in a public school:

I know that that’s not the intention of the Crossing the Rubicon score and the WIP GAP score, but when someone uses a number to tell you whether or not you’re doing something bad, it can feel inhuman in the way that it just makes our goal to just lower the number. It makes it so instead of genuinely wanting to be focused during class, we are doing it just so our GAP score doesn’t drop.

It’s hard to find a balance. That’s why information dumps are not the usual practice in here. All of these experiments in Rubicons and Skinner boxes and other, even weirder metaphors? They’re to help you get at the “genuinely wanting to be focused” part of learning. When they work, we stick with it (e.g., with the profiles themselves), and when they don’t, we try something else (e.g., with the “tallies” of crossed Rubicons — I think we’re done with that).

Sisyphus is our mascot because of Camus’ essay, or at least a pop-culture understanding of it: We have to imagine ourselves happy in a situation that often makes us feel inhuman.

Another, less existential perspective:

I realize now that my everyday habits affect my performance in school and in order to succeed, I must push these habits aside and focus on what’s really important.


From a 5 to a 9


This is universal and universally useful stuff. You should practice it constantly. The more you practice, the easier it gets, the better you do, etc., until you can report something like this:

With there being a sub on the first day this week, I found this as a test for myself. This was a test to see if I could focus even if there was slight chaos around me. And I am proud of what I did. I stayed on task the whole class and completed the in class assignment on time. This triptych, I will be 100% sure that I do not hand a single assignment in even one minute late.

This is the kind of goal-setting that you want. And what’s heartening is that she did it. She didn’t miss any assignments, and what she’s writing now is thoughtful and invested. Here is the same student in another response:

While I was writing, I realized how much I actually appreciated that [The Catcher in the Rye] was a text we were able to read on our own time. In past years we have been forced to read novels during class. It became such an obligation that I absolutely hated it. If someone would have asked me last year, to write about my thoughts on the book we were reading, I most likely would have laughed in their face. Most of the time I never knew what was going on, and if I did I was never interested enough to have an opinion in it. However, since we have been able to read both 1984 and Catcher In the Rye on Our own time, I was able to analyze the books deeper than I ever had before. I was able to….. Enjoy the book.

I take this sort of thing at face value, because (1) this student seems like a genuinely good human being, and (2) even those of you fake this kind of appreciation are still engaging with what we do. Read the tenth part of this essay: Faking it can work in here, if you fake the right things.

Anyway, this student went from a profile in the 5s to a 9 in less than a month. That’s how important in-class focus is: It translates into success everywhere. And even if it feels a bit hokey — especially when it feels a bit hokey — there is power in realizing what we’re trying to do here.


Find Yourself through Your Writing


Here’s another student noticing the power of it:

Everyday when I walk into math class I get handed a worksheet. It has different numbers, but the same idea. I have to solve for X, using only the knowledge that has been shoved into my brain. Every person in the class must come to the same conclusion, and if you don’t, it’s considered to be wrong. It’s similar to be given a sketch and then told to color it. You can choose any color you would like, but ultimately it comes out to be the same picture. It contains no individuality, especially when the beginning picture has been provided to you. Math is like a sketch. A copy of somebody else’s work. Essentially, plagiarism.

Everyday when I walk into the makerspace, I get handed my own imaginary canvas. In this case it’s my worn out chromebook. For other students, it’s the Macbook pro they were gifted from their last birthday. Either way in 2018 a blank canvas, usually contains some kind of technological advancements. This class was designed for students to take a new step in their english learning career, but also an opportunity to find themselves through their writing.

I think I’ve said before that not everything can be experienced through ironic detachment and memes. We have to allow ourselves to be excited about learning, to want to learn, to enjoy the freedom to figure things out. Then you can send each other memes.


In the Kingdom of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man Is King


Here is another student whose work over the last month fits a 9:

This post starts with a very powerful quote “Do not gather your pitchforks and torches without reading everything available to you in this post.” I understand what this means, because a lot of people like to form their own opinion or become aggressive or defensive about something that they don’t even have any knowledge of. This is the very definition of ignorance. However, in this class, referring to the posts that detail what is required of each student, a lot of kids don’t read it. So, it is hard to tell them not to say anything without completely understanding, when in reality they are probably not even going to touch this post so they would never even see that quote. This can make it very frustrating for others that hear people complain when in reality they do not even know why they got the grade that they got.

I read the gap quarter three A and B notes, however I have to say that they were not very useful because these are things that have been reiterated in class. It was more of reminding people than saying anything new.

That is pretty insightful. I know that the people who most need the feedback in a post like that — or a post like this one, right here — aren’t going to read it. But as this student points out, most posts “are things that have been reiterated in class.” That’s why the term is interstitial. You get the same access and feedback and so on in class as online.

Another purpose of all this writing is to galvanize the best of you to help others — to have you galvanize, in turn, the people who don’t read posts or seek feedback. Read it again: GAPs in Herd Immunity. The more you help each other, the stronger we all get.


Metacognition Is the Key


The other way you get stronger is through metacognition:

I mostly get my higher grades through metacognition, which is a key aspect of the class and my Pareto Project, which I work on every quarter because it is something I like to do. So as we near the next grading section I would like to see my work on that spreadsheet again, so I can make sure I am doing all the work required and doing it right.

The bolded phrase in “Verbing Weirds Language,” gave my a smile and also stated the truth. In this day in age, people like to act before thinking, fix something before knowing exactly what they are fixing. Some people just don’t have the awareness to realize what they are doing wrong and how their grade reflects that. I saw a couple grades that were low in the spreadsheet, but when looking at the work, it justified the low grade. One student didn’t do any work. Zero. Another completed two assignments, asked for a 7, and got a 5-. Some students think that they are invincible to low grades, others think that by doing nothing and trying to fake their way through the class, their grade won’t suffer. They are wrong. This class is student oriented. If you don’t put in the work, your grade will reflect that. If you do, you grade will prosper.

Metacognition is, always has been, and always will be the key. Done properly, it unlocks everything else you want, from a high grade to a truer understanding of how you learn. That’s done properly , though. This student does it properly. And it’s true that “people like to act before thinking, fix something before knowing exactly what they are fixing.” You need patience to improve.


Your Style, On Your Terms


This student refers specifically to the AP curriculum, but the insight applies to every class in Room 210:

As we’ve progressed throughout the year, I’ve noticed that I have become more aware of my actions and thinking about why I did something, or what pushed me to do or not do something. I think that GAP scoring is a great way to self assess because it lets you evaluate from your perspective how well you did. Mr. Mullane’s military history class also has GAP scoring because for most assignments there are no right or wrong answers which I feel applies here too. When someone writes in this class, they write in their words, their style and on their terms. This class allows for that, which I haven’t experienced in other English classes, but I have the freedom to respond to a prompt in anyway that I want. I like that I’m not graded on just my writing because I don’t write formally and I don’t prefer to. I want the reader to hear me when they read whatever I’ve written or else it won’t feel like I wrote it. I don’t know if that flies for the AP but my goal in this class isn’t to pass the AP or even stress about it. I want to use this class to my own advantage and do the assignments in the way that they will benefit me. For example, writing about reading helps me break down what I’ve done, how I’ve understood it, and how I should move forward. As I go on with the book I would like to write about it more and how I connect with Holden- I plan to have a few of those for myself for Quarter 4.

Consider this line: “I want to use this class to my own advantage and do the assignments in the way that they will benefit me.” That’s a good approach, as long as you recognize that it always helps to have help figuring out what will benefit you. Your idea of what works is likely to be improved by some feedback — critical and constructive feedback, especially.


The Two Aspects of the Class


Here’s more feedback about how difficult it is to square the circle:

The central message of this post was clearly that we must learn how to find success in this course. That does not mean we should work merely towards a high grade (even though achieving a high grade should reflect an investment in the course). We should instead be focused on growing and improving our character. I noticed in the comments that some of my classmates were having difficulty separating the grade from the process of learning. I completely understand the confusion here, but I’m not really sure how it can be amended. It’s difficult to separate these two aspects of the class, especially when grades are so impactful in our lives.

That’s why it’s abatement, not de-grading or a “Kohnian shift” (which was its original form). Grades can’t be eliminated. They can barely be mitigated. All we can do is gut the smoke-filled, belching machinery inside of them, replace it all with something better, and change what the number means. The number is ineluctable.


Lengthy Feedback: Read Carefully


Which brings us to a set of responses written to a student asking questions about the difficulty of separating these two aspects of the class. While his questions have been answered before, I thought there might be a benefit to using them to help everyone at this point in the year.

My responses are in red:

Read that carefully, as its title suggests. If you’ve gotten this far, tell that friend who blew off this post to read this document carefully, even if you can’t make them see the value in the rest.


Next Steps: Proxy Feedback


When this kind of feedback is flipped — posted anonymously so that you can all benefit from it — the student is pretty much required to become a proxy teacher, using his or her newfound insight to help others. You’ll see that idea emphasized in that “Lengthy Feedback” above, but it needs to be emphasized, because two things are about to happen: You’re going to see the GAP Q3C data I have, and you’re going to hear about a list of students who should be acting as proxy teachers.

These students are what I’d call journeymen. They’re learning how to make themselves better students and people, how to think and read and write well, how to hack their own learning, etc., and they’re well on their way to a kind of master craftsmanship. They’re able to teach others.

If you’re one of these students, you’re going to get a notification about it. You need to reach out to help others, and if you haven’t realized that already, it will be made explicit. Everyone needs to start working together more regularly. Remember: The best learning happens in groups, and collaboration is the stuff of growth.


A Bunch of Numbers and Notations


Now you’re ready to see the numbers. You should know how to read these spreadsheets, or you know that you need to go back to the GAP Q3A/B post to learn.

Make sure you recognize that the score out of 100 in the “GAP Q3C (Report) — 3/29” column is the one you selected for yourself. It’s what came in as part of your report and self-assessment. You won’t find a true WIP GAP or final GAP score. You’ll have to parse this as-is.

AP students: The first multiple-choice assignment is here, too, as a reference point. It does not factor into your profile, but it obviously matters as part of your exam prep. It might help to see it all together.

Here are the flipped spreadsheets for Q3C:

Ask questions below. Your in-class time is reserved for other assignments for a little while. You need to practice using this kind of forum, and you need a reason to examine your choices outside of the school day.

If you want a starting point for how to process everything in this post, make sure you follow the instructions you were given in the last one:

“Just say, how will you walk?”


  1. I’m editing this after the fact, and I’m going to invite all of you to have a conversation with me about why that is. Here’s the original introduction to this quotation: “To see what one of the strongest 9s has to say, you’ll want to read the entire response that is copied below, in the next subsection of this post.” That’s been deleted, as has the following section. 

AP11: Feb. 21 Updates

As we start the ending of the school year, expect a slight uptick in the number of instructional posts here. We need to hack the exam you take in May, set final goals for your Pareto Projects, and make our way through the usual reading, writing, and thinking1. Read everything posted here carefully, as always, as you would an assigned textbook or a posted lecture.


Next Year First


It’s time to make course recommendations and selections for next year. As this is English, we’ll be looking at your choices for the core ELA credit you are required to carry. Electives will be part of the discussion, but you’ll be able to make those choices on your own. I’m going to push you to take any English electives you can. Creative Expression, for instance, is one of the best courses you’ll find in this building, and any of the new 12R courses, if you go that route, are fantastic.

You have a chance to take exceptional courses from exceptional teachers, so if your schedule permits it, and you have even a passing interest in being a better writer, thinker, human being, etc., consider the electives available to you. When you feel like you’re pushing a boulder up a hill, it’s important to look for the good stuff.

As for the core courses, you have a choice:

  • English 12
  • AP English Literature & Composition
  • DCC English 101

Over the weekend, I’ll recommend you for one of those. But it’s up to you, as it always is, to learn about the choice by asking questions and sorting rubbish opinions from good opinions.

One almost invariably true thing: If a student only complains about a class, that person isn’t trying to help you with your decision. He just wants to vent, or he wants his frustration validated. Pay attention when you hear the language of blame. Think back to the supplemental readings at the end of this discussion we had, and avoid people who sound like that. Be empathetic toward them, but don’t invite them into your decision-making process. As always, you want folks who are thoughtful and insightful and specific, because that’s how you’ll find the shades of experience that separate all of your different choices.

Two things about the college-level choices:

  • That AP course ends, as you might guess, in an AP exam, and you’re expected to take that.
  • DCC requires you to have an 85 GPA or higher, and you have to pass an Accuplacer test, which will be scheduled soon.

When you’re ready, fill out this form:

Loads in a new window.

Just in case, this is the direct URL: https://goo.gl/forms/N773Q8aDmOWcymQ73. Get your choice in as soon as possible, and we’ll compare notes and make a decision together.


More Concrete Stuff


The classroom’s been slightly rearranged. You need to do more of that yourselves, because there’s always a reason to reconfigure a makerspace, but I had 30 minutes this morning.

Right now, one of our U-shaped tables is lined up with the TV mounted on our wall. That TV has a Chromebit attached to it, so you can log into it as you would any Chromebook. I’ve used it during our brief lapses back into traditional lectures. Use it more collaboratively as we delve into sample essays and practice exams. Let’s see if it helps you in small-group situations.

Otherwise, you all need to use the whiteboards and more often and more effectively. Choose to sit where you’ll get work done, whether that separates you from your friends or not. Put your phone away, if you know it’s disrupting you2. Move the furniture around, too. If nothing else, that’s a great metacognitive prompt: What role does the physical space play in your learning?

Take a look at the bookshelf by my desk, too, for a complete set of prep materials for both exams you’ll take this year. Your final calendar is there, as are a number of other useful handouts.


AP Timed Writing


As of this afternoon, you should each have three prompts, three sets of model responses, and three timed essays of your own. Put them together somewhere safe and accessible. These are your baseline for the written portion of our test prep.

If you haven’t done the metacognitive and reflective requirements for the first two timed essays, you’re behind. Let me help you attack the problem. For the next few months, you need this foundation. The rest of our prep for the AP Exam depends on it.

One more thing: if you want individual feedback, you may have it. Not yet, though. You need to spend a lot more time with the model essays, rubrics, and structural components of these assignments.

When and if you ask for individual feedback — traditional prescriptive and proscriptive commentary, done in colored ink — you are required to use it to teach others, and then you have to write about what teaching taught you. Keep that in mind. Remember what we’re really learning here.


More Readin’


Return your copy of 1984 as soon as possible. The book numbers are posted near the door to our space, where we can line the books up on a rolling cart to return them to the English Department’s book room (Which is a good place to visit, if you like the idea of a room filled with books. It’s always interesting to see what hidden treasures are lined up in class sets in there.)). If you can’t or don’t find your copy of 1984, you’ll owe the school a little money until you find it.

Our next novel will be The Catcher in the Rye. I’m looking into how this site could help us, and if you’re intrigued by that, let me know why in the comments. More on that soon.


The Course within the Course


Use the updated calendar to keep track of what you’re expected to do in here. Here is another link to it:

This is an organizational tool, sure, and you can see that you’ll be busy until June. But you should try to see beyond those units and lessons. That’s why I listed out goals by content and skill. As long as we hit those marks, there’s a conversation to have about how we hit them.

So there is always flexibility built into our learning. It’s the course within the course that got a mention way back in September:

A Glass Case Full of Lost Treasures and Fossils

If you missed it the first time, each of the subheadings in that instructional post link to a piece by an artist I’d like us to study again in April, during National Poetry Month3.

You have specific goals for the tests you’ll take this year, and you have specific goals for next year. For most of you, that calendar’s how you’ll meet your goals: completing whatever’s assigned, getting feedback keyed to your needs, etc., until you move on to the next boulder/mountain combo.

I hope, though, that you all see the opportunities to break off from the beaten path, as they say. Try to embrace the opportunities you have here.


  1. I’m most excited about teaching you all poetry in April. Of course, my excited face looks exactly like every other face I make, which is to say it looks like a frail lumberjack struggling against existential terror. 

  2. Especially if you’re told it’s disrupting you. Use the back corner to store your devices for 30 minutes. It’s got to be your choice, but I am strongly suggesting you make a specific decision there. 

  3. Also, here is what boggles my mind: That post, from September 7, 2017, lays out in exact detail everything you’d need to do to get a 100 average in here, which is the same as what you’d need to do to become highly skilled and insightful and so on. That post showcases exactly how this kind of instruction works, how collaboration works, how to be metacognitive, etc., in about as transparent a way as is possible. It’s a bit much to read, sure, but so is the contract you sign for a job. So is the guide to the SAT you force yourself through. So is the reading required for that first driving test. When you’re given exact instructions for getting what you want, you should study them. So the mind-boggling thing is how many students missed the blueprint, despite how often it was posted, photocopied, given in a traditional lecture, rewritten and reposted and re-lectured, etc., from the first day of school until now. There’s a reason we end up talking about self-control and blame as often as we do. 

Metaphorical Mixture

This is what I see in my own metaphorical mirror, of course, although I’m never quite sure which character I am.


The Metaphor Is the Message


“It’s human nature to conceive of abstract ideas through more immediate, concrete experiences,” goes the beginning of this Mental Floss article on the hidden etymologies of certain words. We use metaphors to make sense of the world around us, and the language of those metaphors shapes our thinking.

Certainly that’s a recurring idea in our study of truth, lies, and memory. It’s a theme in 1984, and you’ll actually grapple with the idea of “dying metaphors” when we study another bit of writing by the same author. For a moment, though, focus on “The Ways We Lie” and the emulation-through-analysis prompts you were given in this post:

Exit, Pursued by a Bear

Remember that posts like that are written to teach you, not just to present you with assignments and deadlines. That post, for instance, forces you to read slowly and carefully, if you want to know what to read and what to write. It provides context and plenty of opportunities for enrichment.

Google Classroom, meanwhile, contains a much more linear and rote version of our work. You’ll still need to be organized, but it’s harder to get lost — in the sense of developing curiosity and self-awareness.

Regardless, you’ve now had three weeks to read Stephanie Ericsson’s essay, “The Ways We Lie,” which is third in your reading packet, and make your way through the ETA and essay prompts, which are in your writing packet. The essay prompt is built around the following quotation, and you’ll notice it has its fair share of metaphorical language:

Martin Buber once said, “The lie is the spirit committing treason against itself.” Our acceptance of lies becomes a cultural cancer that eventually shrouds and reorders reality until moral garbage becomes as invisible to us as water is to a fish.

How much do we tolerate before we become sick and tired of being sick and tired? When will we stand up and declare our right to trust? When do we stop accepting that the real truth is in the fine print? Whose lips do we read this year when we vote for president? When will we stop being so reticent about making judgments? When do we stop turning over our personal power and responsibility to liars?

List out the metaphors in the first paragraph alone:

  • cultural cancer
  • shrouds
  • moral garbage
  • as water is to a fish

Your own essays are likely to use metaphors in a similar way. That will be one aspect of our in-class workshops over the next few weeks. Pay attention, as you embark on the writing process, to the metaphors you use. (I just used “embark,” for instance, because the metaphor of a journey or river fits our writing process.)


Back to the Looking Glass


That classification and division essay is one of many assignments you must complete over the next few weeks. You’ve been given a complete list through Google Classroom, but I will link to it and embed it again here:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F01%2FCYOA_-Q2C-Ongoing-Tasks-1.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

You have a predictive calendar covering every day for the rest of the year, too — load “What You Need Right Now” at the top of the home page — which is a reminder that you are also reading 1984, hacking high-stakes exams, and working on your Pareto Projects.

You are busy! That’s by design. And it gives us a chance to do what was always planned for the end of the semester.

What Was Always Planned for the End of the Semester

Each of you will meet with me, one at a time, to review your performance. We will go through your evidence from the most recent GAP panel, but that’s not all we will consider. If you are in a co-taught class, these performance reviews will include Ms. Olson, too.

First, you should recognize that this takes an ungodly amount of class time to do. We can afford to do it once, only once, and only because of the interstitial instructional and feedback model we use.

Second, the governing metaphor continues to be the mirror, specifically the looking-glass logic of Alice. Here is the metaphor in November:

A Looking-Glass Book

The final line of that instructional post is this: “You are what you do, and you must be honest about what that means.” We have returned to that need for collective clarity and personal honesty again and again, until the need bubbled over into a day of storytelling and lectures:

The Mirror

That image and link lead this site’s top-right menu now. Its lessons are more important than ever, especially the TL;DR of it: ​Stop shifting the blame in this course. Take responsibility for the choices you’ve made, or accept that your frustration and lack of learning is the choice you’ve made.

That’s the half-empty looking glass, to mix a couple of metaphors together. The half-full: Some of you remain a bit lost, and a conference will help. You need help fighting the dishonesty, cynicism, and selfishness that surround all of us — the “cultural cancer that eventually shrouds and reorders reality until moral garbage becomes as invisible to us as water is to a fish,” as Ericsson puts it.

So I want you to think of Alice and her looking glass. What we do lies on the other side, and you pass through by stepping into your own reflection.You must confront who you are and what you’ve done. There is no other way through.

Once on the other side of the mirror, the environment changes and a lot of the old rules stop applying. That’s what I promised on the first day of school, and it will stay a promise on the last: There are two courses taught in Room 210, and one of them can change your life.

Before you cross that membrane, however, you have to look critically at the reflection in front of you. You have to confront the truth. And that means recognizing the dishonesty and cynicism that throw that truth into relief.

That’s why Ericsson’s metaphor is so powerful. We become numb to lies because the world, unfortunately, is filled with dishonesty. Reason is under attack all around us. You are encouraged, sometimes by people who ought to have your best interests at heart, to blame others and foster distrust. These people, your age and sometimes older, reorder reality. They spread that cultural cancer.

But there are no “alternative facts.” There is absolutely a point after which an uninformed opinion becomes an error of fact. There is right and wrong, truth and fiction, and we can separate the one from the other if we are careful.

Through the mirror, there is an invitation to do good. There is an invitation to dialectical discussion. There is empathy. There is an opportunity to guide your own learning in defiance of a 100 years of broken educational policy.

I can help you pass through that mirror to a place where you have complete control over what you learn and how much it helps you. If you’re already there, I can help you make sense of what that means. But you have to work for it. It can’t be handed to you; that’s another metaphor entirely.

Remember that you’ve already been invited to stop blaming others, to learn self-control, and to break out of the Skinner-box machinery of traditional education. The only difference between that approach and what we’ll start tomorrow is that the language (and metaphor) of invitation will shift to the language of requirement. We will meet, one at a time, for as long as it takes.

90% of you will walk away from that conference in a much better place. (I actually think it will be 100% of you, in defiance of Sturgeon’s Law, because you’d have to be as stubborn as a Flat Earther to stay cynical or misinformed afterward.) That brief loss of choice will ultimately give you more choice than ever.

Meanwhile, you will work on the learning that has been provided for you, interstitially, using the makerspace as necessary.

Ask questions about this — any of it, from metaphors to etymology to Alice in Wonderland to the structure of a conference — below.

Exit, Pursued by a Bear

Image from nosoonersaid by way of Act III, Scene 3 of The Winter’s Tale, which is famous for one of the strangest stage directions of all time. (The link to the original source for the image no longer works, unfortunately.)

 


Snow Days and Elder Gods


For most of us, this is an encouraging sight:

Those are all potential delays, early dismissals, or cancellations in the next week or so. That’s good news, because we all retain at least part of our childhood excitement over snow days. It always feels like a gift from whatever deity we believe in.

Which is Cthulhu, naturally.

As we grapple with snow days, we’ll see that this course is built to withstand pretty much any disruption. That’s why instruction is flipped, feedback is revolutionized, assessment is shifted, and so on. It’s also why a post like this one exists: to set up the foreseeable future in a permanent, archived place.

Bookmark this page. If you have questions about anything we’re doing for the rest of January, the answer’s likely to be here.


The Essential Questions


It’s always worth reminding you, the stakeholders in all this, that this is a Humanities makerspace. It’s the first of its kind. See the syllabus again for the questions we ask and the problems we solve:

That syllabus lists the essential questions we might ask and attempt to answer through collaboration and experimentation. The biggest ones persist through every other unit of study:

Click for the entire syllabus.

That’s a screenshot of a document distributed and posted in early September, in case there’s any doubt about how long ago this was set up for students. Everything we do is about those questions. They really are universal: What does it mean to live a good life? How can we co-exist differently? What is the purpose of school?

Even our course calendar, which is always available on the side of this site, provides students an explicit maker focus:

That’s a screenshot of the current “unit,” which is really just the three weeks carved out for GAP purposes. During that time, we are tackling issues of truth, lies, and memory, just as we did in December. We are prioritizing the skill of close reading, especially of literature, and writing several emulative essays. We’re also beginning prep for the exams students will take at the end of the year.

That’s why stakeholders have two calendars right now, with this one added on December 11:

It’s separated by course level. The second calendar takes the focus on makerspace innovation and essential questions and pitches it in terms of daily focus. There is a day set aside every week or two just for sustained, silent reading, and plenty of time scheduled for test prep. At the end of every week, we’ll return to students’ Pareto Projects, which we launched at the beginning of the year:

Pareto Project Guide (2017-2018)


Crossing the Rubicon


Part of that focus on what students do in class — a focus that has been in place since the beginning, but is now controlled more — is a new approach to how your decisions are monitored and tracked. Think of it as a nod to Big Brother, since we’re reading about him.

There are several documents that cover this revamped approach to student accountability. They were all distributed in class and online on December 10:

That’s a screenshot of the Google Classroom feed for one of the AP classes, in case there are any doubts. The posts for the other three class periods are identical, except for the remaining schedule, which is course-specific.

We went over these ideas in class on December 11, 2017, in one of the rare lectures students have had to sit through in Room 210. Here are direct links to the documents themselves:

They are all very, very important. If you had to choose one to focus on here at the start of 2018, however, I’d pick Crossing the Rubicon.


Infinite Campus Update: Cross[ed] the Rubicon


The guide to stakeholder involvement talks extensively about how to keep up with student progress. Google Classroom tracks the writing process, metacognitive and reflective writing, and most other evidence of student learning. This website contains instruction, general feedback, and all course materials and guides. The GAP scores entered into Infinite Campus every three weeks or so convey a nuanced, specific profile of each student (provided we line up that number with the profiles, skills and traits, and course basics).

I think it’s worth revisiting the why behind this, especially as it related to the Skinner-box logic of student motivation in most places. For now, though, we’re talking about a change that was made over the break to how we use Infinite Campus. I’m going to quote Alfie Kohn again, before I explain that change, and ask you to think about his wisdom:

It’s not enough to disseminate grades more efficiently — for example, by posting them on-line. There is a growing technology, as the late Gerald Bracey once remarked, “that permits us to do in nanoseconds things that we shouldn’t be doing at all” (quoted in Mathews, 2006). In fact, posting grades on-line is a significant step backward because it enhances the salience of those grades and therefore their destructive effects on learning.

Nothing is more disheartening than students spamming F5 on Infinite Campus, waiting for a number to tell them whether they’ve been punished or rewarded. Grade abatement solves this by removing the immediacy from the number, and by transforming what the number means: from a cryptic calculation to a clear, holistic, forgiving, student-centered profile.

Grade abatement eliminates the unpredictability of feedback, too, since there are hard-coded dates for student self-assessment and “collective human judgment informed by evidence,” as Tony Wagner puts it. It can take anywhere from a day to a month to get assignments scored and entered in a traditional classroom; in here, the process is everything, and we can evaluate that process whenever we need to.

And I say all that because there is now an “assignment” in Infinite Campus, next to the GAP score:

That’s what it looks like on my end. To a student, it will appear only if there is a number entered into the scoring column.

Like everything else, this “assignment” is a lesson unto itself. Students have to be able to read closely and think critically. By looking carefully, you’ll see that it isn’t part of score calculations, which means it isn’t part of a final average. The number of “total points” is irregular. And it’s got a strange name: “Crossed the Rubicon.”

For Stakeholders: What the “Rubicon” NUMBER in Infinite Campus MEANS

This is the number of times that a student met the criteria outlined in this document on in-class focus. Instead of sending emails, printing documents, etc, and relying on students to convey that information to other stakeholders, this weaponizes the worst parts of online gradebooks: Here is a clear, unavoidable number that tells all of us how often a student failed to meet the basic requirements of the classroom.

The total “points” available reflects the total number of days that our calendar indicates we will meet during that GAP cycle. For the last part of Q2, we are supposed to meet 13 times, hence the 13 for total “points” available. In December, there were only ten days considered.

If a student has nothing here, she did her job every day. I’m not putting a zero down, because zeros are the most charged and toxic numbers in education. All the explanation in the world can’t prevent a zero from triggering panic and anxiety in most students.

If there is a number there when we do our GAP scoring, that’s how many class periods featured one of these:

  • doing homework for another class
  • playing games
  • sending text messages
  • watching videos
  • sleeping
  • rappelling down the side of the building and escaping into the woods
  • gossiping
  • complaining
  • gazing too long into the abyss
  • checking social media accounts

That’s a partial and partially ironic list. The serious piece of this is that focus and self-control are the mainstays in any real success in any walk of life. I’m not writing down a student who is distracted for a moment; I’m tracking students who are clearly not meeting the basic requirements of focus and self-control.

If this is too close to the Skinner-box logic we carefully avoid everywhere else in this makerspace, there won’t be “Rubicon” numbers online in Q3. Let’s see how the rest of January goes.


New Seats: Starting Positions


Another shift for the new year is that all students have assigned seats. I’ve printed labels, placed them at tables, and covered it all in packing tape to protect from the spillage of high school students. These seats won’t change unless we get new students (which has already happened since I began typing this post, naturally).

Students are going to see immediately that these seats are clustered together, away from the whiteboards, charging stations, PC bank, and other creative elements of the makerspace. The goal has always been to make better use of the space, so much so that it was an explicit assignment in Q1:

Concrete and Abstract

So we have to think of these seats as starting positions, not desks. Students sit in them at the start of class, and then they let the bell do its Pavlovian job: They get up, reconfigure their groups and workspaces, and use this room to get things done. When the second bell rings, they put the seats and furniture back where it was when they started.

To address the students directly1: You are responsible for the space now. If you don’t put the furniture and seats back where they belong, that reflects poorly on your self-awareness and collegiality. If you don’t make good, conscious decisions about how to reconfigure the room from day to day, that reflects poorly on your critical thinking and self-efficacy.


Readings: January, 2018


The only exception to the modular chaos I’m describing in that previous section is the sustained, silent reading scheduled from time to time in every class. On those days, the focus is on individual reading, and student choice is limited.

Below is the packet that we are using throughout January, 2018:

It contains an excerpt from 1984 and three essays. Here is a direct link to the full text of Orwell’s novel:

All of our work will use these pieces. Additional reading, especially when it’s exam-driven, will be delivered through Google Classroom. When we launch a new set of essential questions — or expand on our study of truth, lies, and memory — the reading will look like this, too: a piece of traditional literature attached to essays and short fiction.

As always, the primary focus is on how we learn, not the products we hang on the fridge. It’s not important that you finish 1984, for instance, although I sincerely hope you do. It’s important that you track your interactions with the novel2. I’d strongly suggest a weekly appointment with a journal of sorts — something in which you reflect on your reading, think about your choices, and draw some insight.


Writings: January, 2018


That’s one type of writing you should be doing: reflective, metacognitive responses to what you’re reading and discussing in class. Essays will continue to be process-driven exercises built on whatever we’re reading. Here, for instance, is what you were working on before break:

The first prompt there is derived from the Regents Exam, which all juniors have to take; the second prompts you to write the kind of essay Paul Graham encourages. That’s why your assignment before break was to submit evidence of the process of writing the second response, not necessarily a finished copy. Real writing is ongoing, when it has to be, and often unfinished.

We’ll continue to balance test-based necessity against authentic writing in this way. You’ll also spend part of this month learning how to publish your writing online, which will let you generate a portfolio of work for the future.

Formal assignments, as always, will be posted to Google Classroom. The next writing prompt will ask for classification and division, a style of essay you’ll see in “The Ways We Lie,” which is part of the reading. There will be emulation-through-analysis exercises, too, to get you going.

We might be able to start that tomorrow, but it also might take a few days to shake off the holiday atrophy and remember how to use Room 210. That’s the benefit of the calendar you now have: The middle of every week is makerspace-driven, which means you are solving problems and creating meaning and generally trying to learn as much as you can. It might be very predictable, if we’re in the midst of a novel or essay, or it might change individually from day to day.

That freedom should prompt some regular reflection and metacognition, too. The students who get the most out of this class are the ones who learn how to use its freedom most effectively, and that takes self-awareness and self-monitoring.

It’s a lifelong skill, too. Why do you think I write so often? It isn’t just to flip instruction and give us more time together in class. This is how I refine the course so it works better for students: by reflecting and being metacognitive about what we do. You need the same habit of mind.


Interstitial Discussion


Use this online space to talk to me about what you’re thinking and what you need. Use Google+ or some other online tool to work interstitially with each other3. Try to reserve class time for face-to-face interactions, like workshopping an essay or discussing what you’re reading.

Play the part until it isn’t a part anymore. You have about six months left in here, which is just enough time to build a better version of yourself before you head off to the next stage. Remember, though, that whatever choices you make each day are yours. This course is a mirror, and blame is just a way to hide from what it shows you. You’d do well to remember that:

Read this again, as necessary, to remind yourself what is at stake.


  1. This is being written with the idea that other stakeholders should start to monitor what I’m teaching, because it really does take a village to do this thing. That was part of the reason to flip instruction and take the massive time required to write all this down: to let parents, counselors, principals, etc., be part of a Humanities makerspace. 

  2. Now I’m back to addressing students directly. They really are the reason we’re here, so it’s hard not to address them. 

  3. I think we are going to find time to look at our course’s erstwhile subreddit, for instance. We may have a mod or two lined up to bring it back to life. We’ll see. 

A Looking-Glass Book


Full of Looking-Glass Creatures


The following Google Form asks you to self-assess the three-week period of work that ends on November 3. See the complete calendar for the start date (and the start/end dates for all GAP periods).

You should technically include the work you do on Thursday, November 2, and Friday, November 3, in your self-assessment, which would mean waiting until the weekend to complete this form. Instead, any evidence created after you submit the form will be folded in by me, over the weekend, when your self-awareness and self-efficacy and so on are being evaluated.

You need the next 24 hours or so to review the things you seem to have forgotten. As always, this does not apply to all of you. It applies to enough of you to justify a post, though, which always brings us back to the idea of herd immunity. You are responsible to each other.

The basics:

  1. Profiles, Skills, & Traits (goo.gl/LGaKUU)
  2. Keys to the Course: Focus & Feedback (goo.gl/efm6CS)
  3. Three Steps: What Do I Do Next? (goo.gl/4zcqCd)

You are assessed on eight pairs of universal skills and traits. You make dozens of choices every week as part of the usual variety of ELA assignments, from how you read an article about empathy to how you craft your own writing responses. You answer questions, take notes, have in-class discussions, etc., and are required to be metacognitive more or less constantly. It can seem very, very complicated.

It’s not. It all comes down to focus and feedback. The system is built to take the most basic level of investment from you and turn it into something meaningful. It’s demonstrably more difficult to fail than it is to succeed.

We’ll see what you know about this on Thursday. You also have the next 24 hours or so to pull together any evidence you feel is necessary, which you should do before you fill out the required self-assessment form. Anything submitted after 2:30PM on Friday is late. It’ll be factored in, but so will its lateness.

We’ll take Friday to refocus on your Pareto Projects, too, since we’re nearing some of your self-imposed deadlines. If you have let that ongoing work lapse, revisit the original post now:

Pareto Project Guide (2017-2018)

Ask questions below, and remember: You are what you do, and you must be honest about what that means.

AP Adjustments: 10/12/17

Please adjust your ongoing expectations and plans according to this post.


Today, Monday, and Tuesday


Today, Monday, and Tuesday, you are strongly encouraged to use class time to work on the reading and writing and data collection in this post:

Gestalt Suite: Getting to Know You

When you get to the two spider-graph sections, use this handout to help you self-assess. We will go over that in class1.

You are also strongly encouraged to split your class time as necessary between that Gestalt Suite and the work described in this post:

Concrete and Abstract

By Monday, you should be moving around the room, using new areas, sitting in new seats, experimenting with different resources, etc. You can also start bringing in your concrete and abstract contributions to the space.


Friday


Tomorrow, you are most strongly encouraged to split your class time between your Q1B GAP report and your Pareto Projects. The GAP report will be available tomorrow morning, alongside a Google Classroom post that can be used to submit evidence. Review the posters in our classroom for the most salient aspects of the scoring process:

https://goo.gl/7EEuT9


Interstitially


As students in an advanced curriculum, you always have the choice of how to use the resources available to you, which includes class time. The expectation is that you will monitor, analyze, and refine those choices as you move forward. Over the next week or so, I want you to direct that metacognition toward the idea of self-control.

One marker of the highest grade abatement profiles is a “desire to do more than just what is required.” This is one of those opportunities. Read this post carefully — and if you’ve done that already, read it again:

The Fatal Flying Guillotine

You are invited2 to use that post to shape a writing response that does something for you. You might shape it through

(1) your close reading of the post;
(2) metacognitive analysis of how you read this kind of complicated instruction;
(3) your self-awareness with regard to your self-control; and
(4) the assiduousness and self-efficacy you believe it will take to master self-control.

There are other options. A post like this exists to force you to organize, use resources, work with peers, etc; and in the case of this particular post, the goal is to force a discussion of self-control that isn’t a lecture or judgment.

Ask questions and continue your in-class discussions below.  Make this optional work on self-control a requirement you set, and then test your interstitial focus. Above all, let the space help you.


  1. We’ll probably draw these spider graphs next week, too, as a kinesthetic and aesthetic exercise. 

  2. The language of invitation is different from the language of suggestion. I’m strongly suggesting, with “strongly” in italics, that you use your class time in one of a few ways for the next four days. This self-control work is part of an invitation to think critically, read closely, and write responsively. You choose whether or not to accept that invitation. 

Concrete and Abstract

This post has instructions on how we’ll begin our work on Tuesday. As an example of what we’ll be calling “abstract stuff,” here is a newly revised version of the profiles, skills, and traits we use every day:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F10%2FUpdate-GAP-Single-Sheet-BW-Printing.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

Copies will be made for you, although the changes are mostly cosmetic. Pay attention to the category headings for the skills and traits. There is a colorized version of this, too, but the embedded PDF above will behave better with the printers in our building.


Creative Clutter, Continued


Before we get to Tuesday’s plans, the expectation, as always, is that you’ve read every recent instructional posts. If you haven’t, do that immediately:

I promise that most of your confusion or frustration will disappear as soon you read those instructional texts. You have to read them, though — not just load them in a browser window or print a copy that sits in your backpack. As always, these are the instructions you need, and they are written so that engaging with them forces you to slow down, practice close reading and critical thinking, and develop the organization skills you need to make sense of complicated ideas.

One of those posts introduces a focus on the physical classroom, which we will begin to clutter creatively on Tuesday. We want to think differently about how we populate our space, starting with a shift away from “decorate” as the verb. That word comes from the same root that gives us decor and decorum, which is mostly about how we expect to find things. Our room is about breaking expectations in an innovative way.

This is prompted on my end by how you are using technology. Educational tech, including the device you’re using right now, can’t compromise our embrace of face-to-face discussion and more kinetic or kinesthetic 1 work.

To put it more directly: Yes, you need to put down the screens and talk to each other more. That’s true out in the real world, and it’s true in here. The computer or smartphone is an essential bit of technology — even curmudgeons have to accept that — but there must be a balance. That’s one of our two focuses this week2.

That brings us to a teacher-led, asynchronous, offline activity for Tuesday:

Those are the two rolling whiteboards in Room 210. You are going to work together across class periods to fill those boards with ideas, which will be photographed and flipped back to you at the end of the day on Wednesday. Any other notes you keep are up to you. Below is a quick overview of what to expect.


Concrete Stuff


These categories aren’t really about what you can touch versus what you can’t, although that’s pretty close. Instead, you should think of it as tools and technology versus semiotics and inspiration. On the concrete side, you are thinking first about how to populate our bookshelves with transformative literature, collections of poetry that teach us about being a human being, autodidactic texts, etymological dictionaries, and so on. You’re going to take over these bookshelves, build new ones, and then organize it all to encourage us to read more often and more closely — without the usual Skinner-box threats of a classroom. The other concrete considerations are manipulable materials like Legos and fidget toys.

Furniture | Checked off because we already have what we need. As tempting as it is to talk about comfy chairs and rugs, that stuff isn’t a priority. We have modular furniture, whiteboards, rolling carts, etc.

Technology | Similarly, we’re set here. It would be nice to have a dedicated desktop for Pareto Projects — one for musical composition, video editing, and so on — but that’s not a priority, either. You have your Chromebooks, your smartphones, a classroom printer, and a Chromebit-enabled TV screen.

Books | There are now multiple empty bookcases in our classroom. Again, your job is to fill them with books of all kinds, but especially with books that help us create meaning for ourselves. That means poetry, literature, essay collections, graphic novels, and so on. Look at what we already have, and remember the point of reading in a Humanities makerspace. My examples are an epic poem and some underground hip-hop.

Destressors | This category is what it sounds like: the stuff that will help you mitigate your stress while you work in this space. My example is Legos, which are used by many companies to promote creativity and fight stress. You’ll also see board games like Scrabble in the room already. In high school, we’re focused on fighting stress as much as promoting creativity, so think about both sides of the equation.

You can ask questions below about these categories whenever you like. It’s up to you to figure out how best to talk to each other over the course of the next few days, just like it’s up to you to figure out how to work together to start bringing this stuff into the room.


Abstract Stuff


The abstract stuff is where most of our work is going to take place. We need actionable inspiration on the walls. We need symbols surrounding us. We need the space to encourage the sort of introspection and collaboration and innovation that lives at the heart of our system.

One way to think about these abstract concepts is to see each option in terms of how it improves the learning environment. Use the language in the grade abatement profiles to motivate you: This is a chance to contribute to the learning environment so that your peers are galvanized, encouraged, supported, etc. It’s easy to explain why you think a book of William Blake’s poetry might help us experience the Humanities; it’s harder to explain how a mechanical Sisyphus improves our learning.

Protocols + Procedures | Taken care of already through the posters and handouts we have. There will be more of this stuff on the walls as we move forward, and any new iterations of course materials — for instance, of our writing process, which we will delve into in Q2 — will be posted, too. The Pinterest boards posted here have plenty of non-course examples.

Inspirations | These will primarily be posters or decals on the walls, but I would include certain kinds of artwork, too. It’s about drawing creative inspiration for your work. My example is a prominently displayed decal of a Latin expression: Verba volant, scripta manent. That is the philosophy of the course, so its inspirational efficacy is different from, e.g., a poster like this.

Symbols | Clutter in our classroom needs to have purpose behind it. We’re using metaphors and symbols to push back against traditional learning, which is why my examples are a statue of our favorite rhinoceros and this Lego Sisyphus. You need to think critically about the semiotics of our space.

Again, you can ask questions below about these categories whenever you like. It’s up to you to figure out how best to collaborate, and we’ll need that collaboration to procure or print or otherwise produce what we need.


  1. Kinetic refers to motion itself, while kinesthetic refers to your perception of that motion. It’s another example of the meta- level to our work. 

  2. The other is a gestalt suite of self-assessments that will be posted later. That’s one reason we need this focus on the kinetic/kinesthetic stuff: You’re going to be doing a lot of reading and answering questions online this week, and you need to balance that. 

Scripta Manent


Interstitial Options


In one of the instructional posts you have been asked to read1, you’ll find this Latin phrase: Verba volant, scripta manent. It is the idea that “spoken words fly away, [while] written words remain.” It’s important enough to the philosophy in here that we probably want it posted on the wall as part our burgeoning creative clutter.

Why? Well, we live in a hypertextual world, which means that we can communicate through the Internet in ways that were unimaginable even 20 years ago. The written word is more permanent, more accessible, and more immediate.

Face-to-face discussion, of course, remains as powerful as ever in a classroom environment. What we want to do is to expand that environment to include interstitial options, like this website and Google Classroom. I’ve tried to explain the evolution of it in this essay, which you are encouraged to read. Here’s what Neil Postman had to say about it, in what is probably another lock for the classroom wall:

Writing makes it possible and convenient to subject thought to a continuous and concentrated scrutiny. Writing freezes speech and in so doing gives birth to the grammarian, the logician, the rhetorician, the historian, the scientist — all those who must hold language before them so that they can see what it means, where it errs, and where it is leading.

I’m repeating a lot of what you’ve already been told, but that’s the point: The more often we write down our ideas, the more we are able to revisit and refine them. The more we think in writing, the clearer those thoughts become. It’s an act of iteration, and we need to experiment with tools that let us iterate and collaborate better.

Some of you are already using the comment section of this website to ask questions and engage with the material. That’s great. You’re also sharing documents through Google Drive and leaving comments on each other’s writing in Docs. That’s great, too. Your next stop is Google+ Communities, which were fairly successful last year:

Look at those online communities, make note of how students are interacting, and consider how we can adapt Google+ for this year. You can build your own Google+ Community that is as focused (e.g., on a single table in a single period) or as expansive (e.g., the entire junior class) as you want. I want you to find time over the next two or three weeks to experiment. Those of you who have already built a Community need to share your findings with others.

One way to share our thinking and bolster a community is to use this subreddit:

It hasn’t been utilized in more than a year, but I think it could be rebooted to be tremendously helpful in here. It exists outside the technical boundaries of the school, yet runs under the auspices of the course. It isn’t just an extension of Room 210. It’s a subreddit about carving meaning out of difficult circumstances and using language to transform ourselves and our surroundings. It’s about becoming better people by hacking our current habits and mindsets. It’s part of a makerspace, and that kind of work continues long after you graduate and see your BHS Google account deleted.

At least, it could exist in that capacity. You’ll see that some of the erstwhile moderators are graduates, and I’ll reach out to them to see about their interest in remaining part of the community. I’ll also invite you to think about becoming a mod yourself, if this idea takes off.

The first thing I’d like you to try to do with one or more of these interstitial options is to share your Pareto Project ideas with each other. These projects are a great example of makerspace work that doesn’t require a classroom to be successful. Note carefully that this is not a formal assignment; it’s directed mostly at the students who fit (or are hoping to fit) the highest profiles. This is another example of doing more than just what is required, and it’s absolutely the best kind of galvanizing, infrastructural work you should be doing.

Ask questions below about how to get started with Reddit, Google+, etc, and offer suggestions about what else might help us work together interstitially. One of you has suggested Discord, for instance, so I’m looking into that. What else might fit our makerspace?


  1. There’s no hyperlink, because you need to start making those connections on your own, at least eventually. Everything connects, and most things are reiterated again and again. If you can’t see the bigger picture, let me know, and I’ll help fill it in.