Makerspace FAQ

Classes in the makerspace study literature, write essays, explore essential questions, prepare for English exams, etc., just like any English class would. The difference is an overhauled and interlocking system for instruction, assessment, and feedback.

Like the course itself, this post is based on inquiry. Questions can be asked in the comment section or emailed directly to me (meure@brewsterschools.org), but the list below should help answer almost any question.

With that in mind, this FAQ isn’t structured like a normal FAQ. Instead of questions and answers, you’ll find the means to answer questions. Want to know if a “Humanities makerspace” is in line with the high school’s English Language Arts skills framework? Here is the answer. What about the district’s Strategic Coherence Plan? Covered exhaustively. Wondering how “grade abatement” works? Read the guides and testimonials. Heard that feedback looks different? I’ve included hundreds of examples.

Students in the space learn through direct and online instruction, with ample opportunity to experiment and ask for help. For every other stakeholder, this FAQ is a way to be informed. My goal is 100% transparency about what we do and how effective it is.

Note that the syllabus and orientation links are for AP English Language and Composition. That is because prospective AP students need information on the unique College Board curriculum, since it is implemented with the same fidelity given to the ELA framework and SCP.


Resources


Sisyphean High | Main site for materials, instruction, and online discussion. (You’re on it right now.)
The Humanities Makerspace | Google Site with testimonials, classroom pictures, student work, and much more.

Testimonials | Direct link to testimonials that connect the makerspace to the SCP and ELA skill spiral. Critical for student buy-in.
Engines That Could | Student self-analysis assignment built on the SCP and ELA skill spiral.

Syllabus | Explanation of the makerspace and overview of the AP course.
Course Orientation | Interstitial instructional post that covers the basics for all courses at the beginning of the school year. Updated for 2018-2019.

The GAP Process | Protocol and materials for grade abatement. Explains the entire assessment process. Updated for 2018-2019.
Clarifying Grade Abatement | More perspective on profile-based assessment. Updated for 2018-2019.
Mind the GAP | Unpacks the biggest previous updates to pedagogy in the space. From 2016.

Profiles, Skills, & Traits | Direct link to PDF of the profiles, skills, and traits that drive our learning.

Pre-GAP Triage: Overview | Overview of how exhaustively student data are collected and used in the space. For a direct link to evidence of this: tinyurl.com/gap-triage-218.

The Big Sky | Explanation of how the first quarter of each year is used to build skills that enable us to study content.

The Writing Process | Complete writing process. Built for responses in any genre or mode, but used most frequently for essays. Updated for 2018-2019.
The Reading Process | Complete reading process. Built for any assigned text, but used most frequently for literature. Updated for 2018-2019.

Well, Why Read? | Part of the reading process post. Specifically addresses how literature, nonfiction, and online reading factor into students’ futures.

Reading Calendar | Current schedule of canonical literature in all courses (2019).

The Pareto Project: Complete Guide | Protocol and materials for our Humanities “20 Time” project. Includes links to student work. Updated for 2018-2019.
Pareto Project: FAQ | Set of frequently-asked questions about the Pareto Project.
Pareto Project: Final Self-Assessment | How these “20 Time” projects are assessed in the makerspace.

Molecular Learning | Essay on risk-taking in the makerspace.
The Interstitial Classroom | Essay on the use of technology in the Humanities.
Head Training | One of many essays on the importance of face-to-face work in the makerspace.

Objects in Space | Instructional post about the physical space and how students arrange themselves within it. Includes notes on a mindfulness-based daily check-in form.

Inclusion and Co-Teaching in the Makerspace | Includes screenshots of the feedback process. Informative for students in non-ICT courses, too.

Stakeholder’s Guide | Updated and given directly to parents each year. Useful for all stakeholders, including students. Updated for 2018-2019.

A Better Form of Feedback | Complete overview of how feedback works in the makerspace. Links to other guides.
Mongering and Congeries | One of the links in the above essay. Counters misinformation about the makerspace explicitly and directly.

A Better Kind of Quiz | Overview of quiz-like assessments in the makerspace. Updated for 2018-2019.

Galvanizing Feedback: How to Sisyphean High | Student-generated discussion on how to use the makerspace effectively. Includes more testimonials. Note: In progress as of February 25, 2019.

Twitter: Sisyphean High | Course Twitter account. Used to share student work and course pedagogy with parents and other stakeholders. (Students don’t use Twitter.)

Medium: Sisyphean High | Course Medium account. Used for instructional essays.


How to Use These Resources


Again, it’s about inquiry and exploration, but for prospective students especially:

  1. Don’t read them all.
  2. Read the ones that seem to answer your question or concern.
  3. Read those carefully.
  4. Ask questions.

You can also put your question or concern below, as a comment on this post.

Pareto Project: FAQ

These are answers to the most frequently asked questions about the Pareto Project. Make sure you are familiar with the guide first:

The Pareto Project: Complete Guide


Frequently Asked Questions


Am I required to present my work?

No. The guide tells you that your final product is yours to design, so your project could take just about any form you imagine. What happens, I think, is that the time set aside for these projects — see this 2018-2019 calendar for an example — is dominated by talk of presentations. That’s because we have to schedule those, reserve spaces (like the school’s iTheater), and talk to presenters about time constraints. It takes more planning than, say, sharing a collection of poetry or publishing a website.

What do I do if students don’t pay attention to my presentation?

This is an important question. The short answer is: Ignore them, focus on your work, and let your teachers handle the behavior. Part of the GAP scoring language addresses this. In fact, a criterion for lower profiles is not investing in the classroom environment:

These are the profiles that correspond with failing grades. Look carefully at the idea of deliberate disengagement. Any student who, after being instructed not to, ignores your presentation is risking failure. We’ll take care of that feedback.

The longer answer is this: Be empathetic to the people who aren’t respectful of your work. Many factors go into that decision, whether it results in being on a phone while someone is talking or something more overt. Those folks aren’t excused from the bad decision, but it’s not a decision that has anything to do with you. It’s about them.

Am I required to share my project, if I don’t present?

No. You are strongly encouraged to share your work to some extent, just to give yourself the authentic experience of having others react to your project. The passion that hopefully inspired you to create your project deserves an audience. It doesn’t require one, however, and some projects are intensely personal, or works-in-progress that would be difficult to share right now, or for some other reason less in need of sharing. If you keep in mind the goals of all assessment in the makerspace, you’ll be able to determine what you need to do.

How else can I share my work?

The guide gives you a few options, including Medium, which is the most likely host for written work of all kinds. Medium is also mentioned in this overview of the end of the writing process, which is similarly about sharing your work. There are other online platforms, of course, and you could use any of them to share your project. You’ll know about Instagram for photography, but you might consider VSCO. If you’re writing stories, Wattpad is an option.

The focus on digital options is all about interstitial access — about giving students an audience beyond the classroom and the period. Think of how widely shared TED Talks are, or how often a powerful piece of writing makes its way around social media. That’s important for all of you. The in-class, in-person options are just as important, however, from hanging artwork on the walls to leading your peers through a discussion.

What should I do if I won’t have finished my project by the deadline?

If you haven’t made this clear already, make it clear to your teacher. You’ll need help determining exactly what to do. Fortunately, you aren’t required to present, share, submit, etc., an unfinished project. Rushing something into being isn’t required, either. Instead, you’ll do what we often do: You’ll focus on the process, discuss and write about your ultimate goals for this project, and submit that reflective and metacognitive work.

Is writing about my progress on the project enough for the due date?

I’m including this question separately to reiterate the point: We are almost always more interested in the process than the product, if we must choose between the two. It’s Postman’s idea, which I repeatedly post: The most important thing we learn is always something about how we learn. The products matter, but the process often matters more, especially at your ages.

You also indicated, when you designed your blueprint through the original guide, separate learning and product goals. Everyone, regardless of situation, will write about both of those as part of their Pareto Project.

Will my grade be affected if I do not share my project with others?

No. As always, your grade is determined every three or four weeks by the GAP process, which is detailed here. These Pareto Projects are part of a triptych panel, and we fold it into the assessment like we would any other formal assignment. It’s worth noting, though, that these projects — any project-based work, really, especially 20 Time projects — incorporate every single universal skill and trait. That’s why the complete set of skills and traits is embedded in the original guide: Your Pareto Project is a reflection of your holistic strengths, including every “soft” or non-academic skill and trait. A presentation grade wouldn’t reflect that.

I would like to get feedback from students about my project/presentation. How can I do that?

You have several options. The first is to share your work with your peers through Google Drive, Medium, etc., and to ask for specific feedback. This would work for written projects, slideshows, websites, and other artifacts that are accessible outside of a presentation environment. If you’re presenting, you’ll want to structure some follow-up discussion or feedback, which I’ll help you to do. It can be as immediate as a Q&A after you’ve presented or as in-depth as a formally-assigned writing prompt. As always, you need to know what you want out of that feedback.

Are there guidelines for what non-presenters should complete?

Again, your grade is still a GAP score based on much more than just these projects. Your project’s guidelines should already be clear to you, too, which means what you complete will vary from person to person. You might have guidelines for publishing a story, sharing your progress on an essay, hanging your artwork — it depends.

For everyone, however, there will be a required pair of writing responses addressing your product and learning goals, respectively. You’ll be given those to work on during the two-week block of time, but only after you’re ready. The prompts will be universal, but how you approach your responses will be almost completely individualized.

What will we do when we’re not presenting during the designated two-week block of time?

See the above answer. You’ll also be given an English unit to complete interstitially, using the resources of the classroom to read, think, and write on a particular subject. It might be a series of units, too, depending on where we are in the year and what else you need. We will almost always have enough time during those two weeks to circle up for discussion, read a short story, do some test prep, etc., because not everyone in every class is presenting formally.

Examples of these concurrent units (to give you an idea of what to expect):

  1. English 11, 2018: Reading, analyzing, and emulating a series of short stories, plus some brief Regents Exam practice
  2. English 10, 2018: Analyzing and responding to student-chosen novels, plus revisions of literary analysis paragraphs
  3. AP English, 2018: Deconstructing the article, “Yes, Virginia,” and practicing timed essays