Senior Projects Overview

Menu of Choices

Here are the projects assigned required for 2024:

Here are two other projects that are often adapted or folded into the second semester of senior:

Read on for other updated materials and a rundown of the projects.

Continue reading

February 3, 2020


End of Q2


This week is the last week of the first semester:

Provisional Q2 scores will be posted today. As necessary, we will meet throughout the week to review evidence, discuss progress, and make adjustments. Scores will be finalized on Friday, February 7.

Be sure that you review the following feedback before reacting to your provisional or final GAP scores for Q2:

Static GAP Score Feedback


Start of Q3


Meanwhile, you are beginning the assessment panel for Q3A, which covers the following dates:

For each of the following reading assignments, focus on solidifying your understanding. Take notes, ask questions, chase down links, etc, to the extent that you need the review. Every student needs some review, however, and you should spend at least an hour or so on Monday, February 3, reviewing these posts.

First, review how you’ll be motivated, rewarded, and encouraged for the remainder of the year:

Feedback: In Shambles

The next post covers the idea of a feedback chain, including examples of how one works. You need to focus on your use of feedback as much as your in-class focus during the second semester, and this explains how:

The Feedback Chain

Finally, review the lessons and activities on organization that we covered explicitly earlier in the year. Organize yourself for the second semester:

Organization: Getting Things Done

We will review the major projects for the second semester throughout the week of February 3. You will be set up to complete those projects according to your own timeline. Use the posts embedded above to prepare for that kind of student-driven learning.

You can ask questions about any of this information below.

January 22, 2020

This is a brief overview of where you should be on Wednesday, January 22. It has been cross-posted to your Classroom Materials section and as an announcement on the Google Classroom stream. A third version was posted as a formal assignment: After you’ve reviewed this information, together with me in class or on your own, mark the assignment as done and continue with the writing work. You don’t need to create or attach any additional responses.


Brief Overview for Wednesday, January 22


You’ve read two nonfiction texts on the subject of akrasia — why we don’t follow through on our best intentions — and procrastination. A video based on the second nonfiction piece was given to clarify some of its concepts. You’ve examined those pieces through a worksheet, available in class and online, that invites process analysis and analysis of big ideas and essential questions.

You were then given a prompt to write a shorter essay about the big ideas and essential questions in the nonfiction. You were reissued the universal guide to writing for this. Peer-to-peer narrative feedback sheets were printed for use as you finish the writing, as well.

All other missing work from this quarter should be jettisoned in order to focus on this shorter essay. The only exception is if you have been reassigned the reader-response essay, in which case you should prioritize that work. We can edit and adjust expectations and deadlines through individual meetings.


Current Resources


Delineated below are the resources that are hyperlinked above:

http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2339 | Unit on Akrasia and Procrastination
https://tinyurl.com/sisyphus-writes | Universal Writing Process

https://tinyurl.com/scoreless-feedback | Peer Feedback Sheet

https://tinyurl.com/simple-analysis-01 | Text Analysis: Directions
https://tinyurl.com/simple-analysis-02 | Text Analysis: Online
https://tinyurl.com/simple-analysis-03 | Text Analysis: Offline

http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3714 | Reader-Response Updates and Feedback
http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3736 | Notes on Late and Missing Assignments

Jettison Post Hoc

Students: If you’re reading this, it’s time to jettison some of the overdue assignments that are weighing us down.

As always, if you are willing to give up some of your free time to individualize the process, you can run triage to get extensions and even exemptions for assignments. This boosts your learning and, therefore, your grade abatement profile. More on this later.

Otherwise, you should jettison pretty much every missing or incomplete assignment and move on. The reason is simple: The plane is too heavy to keep flying, and if we don’t toss some of this stuff overboard, you will crash.

So you jettison the work. Check that the following two criteria have been met:

  1. You’ve been asked formally to read this post, probably through Google Classroom. It will be an assignment, even if all you must do is mark it read.
  2. There hasn’t been and won’t be a face-to-face or one-on-one meeting to discuss what missing work to do.

In that case, jettison everything due up to today that you were planning to hand in late. Jettison all of it. Lighten the plane and move on. Find the nearest upcoming deadline. Focus on that.

Note: This includes major writing assignments that you might be re-assigned later. Those will be posted as new work. Everything old goes over the side, unless we meet to work out a way to keep it.


More Words on This


This post will be updated with a link to more contextual information and student data. For now, let’s leave this bit of text as a reminder to return later for more feedback.

January 11, 2020

This post concerns itself mostly with the reader-response essay on The Things They Carried, which is part of the writing work outlined here. It is also an important look at how the average student handles deadlines and directions. It should be read with both concerns in mind.


Reader-Response Essay: Background and The Things They Carried


We began reading The Things They Carried in mid-November. The formal writing assignments were posted online on December 3 at this address: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3517. The details of the required essay, the titular reader’s response, were posted on December 5: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3514.

To help students write the essay, they were given essential questions to answer by December 6. Three days later, on December 9, they were given model responses to these essential questions to use in the writing process: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3683.

The formal essay prompt was also posted to Google Classroom on December 6. The deadline was given as December 19.

For students who did not do the required reading of The Things They Carried, multiple alternative options were provided: the four chapters spanning pages 118-130; “Speaking of Courage,” which starts on page 131; or “The Ghost Soldiers,” which starts on page 180.

Collected in the formal essay assignment were a bevy of resources. Students had access to an instructional post detailing the reader-response process (http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3013); a printed and online guide to writing a reader-response essay (https://tinyurl.com/maker-readres); and a modified chart to use to brainstorm and outline (https://tinyurl.com/reader-res-chart).

Students were also given multiple digital resources for the novel (http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3514) and another copy of our universal writing guide (https://tinyurl.com/sisyphus-writes).

One of the last requirements for this assignment was to submit a copy of the essay to Turnitin.com. Directions for this were covered in class, included on Google Classroom, and posted online: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=1434.


Adjustments and Modifications: “Speaking of Courage”


On December 17, two days before the deadline for these essays, a work-in-progress grade was posted to Infinite Campus. All students and stakeholders were sent a letter explaining these WIP scores and detailing the current assignment: https://tinyurl.com/stakeholders-121719. A copy of the letter was also shared on Google Classroom:

The deadline came on December 19. Students who failed to meet this deadline were immediately given the chance to advocate for extensions and modifications. These meetings took place on December 19 and December 20.

If the assignment was modified, students were required to read only one chapter, “Speaking of Courage,” in order to write their reader’s response. The essay parameters remained in place; because of the nature of O’Brien’s novel, however, a single chapter can be used for a reader-response essay without losing too much effectiveness.

Here is a screenshot of just one class period’s modified assignments as they were posted:

The deadlines were selected by the students themselves, with a hard cap of January 10, which is the start of Q2C. The complete schedule of GAP panels (as in the panels of a triptych) is here: https://tinyurl.com/gap-calendar-19.


Results: January 11, 2020


On January 11, a complete report was run for all student submissions. This deliberately coincides with the Q2B grade abatement profiles posted that weekend to Infinite Campus for the time frame/panel of 12/10/19–1/9/20.

There are 116 senior students in the makerspace this year. For this assignment, ten students had (or have) individualized expectations — extensions through the end of January; exemptions due to unique circumstances; alternative assignments developed in meetings with Guidance, parents, and administration; and so on.

106 students were, therefore, responsible for the reader-response essay that was due at some point between December 19 and January 10. Every student had the opportunity to request an extension or modification, per the rules of a grade-abated Humanities makerspace.

It is important to emphasize this timeline: January 10 was five weeks after the reader-response essay was assigned and two months after students began reading The Things They Carried. After the original deadline of December 19, we were all off for a two-week winter break; there were no other ongoing assignments for English 12 over the break, given students even more time to complete late work.

Equally important: The reader-response essay is an assured experience for English 12 students. So is the novel. These are two ineluctable elements of the English 12 curriculum. They are required. Even without student self-advocacy and a self-selected extension deadline, late work would have been accepted and given feedback.

And, again, students themselves selected the due date for their modified assignments. Any alterations to those self-selected deadlines were honored. All it took — all it ever takes — is student initiative.

The results: As of January 11, 48 of 106 students had not written a reader-response essay. 45% of students did not complete a required assignment.

It is notable that fully 100% of these 48 students have applied to college and, in many cases, been accepted. They plan to matriculate, each and every one, in the fall of 2020.

That statistic, 45%, lines up with what we know about students who aren’t ready for college. In 2014, most college students didn’t earn a degree in four years; more recent studies have the official six-year graduation percentage around 60%:

The official four-year graduation rate for students attending public colleges and universities is 33.3%. The six-year rate is 57.6%. At private colleges and universities, the four-year graduation rate is 52.8%, and 65.4% earn a degree in six years… Looking at national figures, you can see six-year graduation rates:

– Full-time, first-time students: 59.2%
– Transfer, full-time students: 58.9%
– Transfer, part-time students: 37.7%
– First-time, part-time students: 17.7%

The 40% or so who haven’t done an essay for their English 12 class match up with the 40% or so who don’t graduate from college. It’s why this makerspace leans so heavily on universal skills, traits, and knowledge: Without those basics, students won’t be successful next year. So we use these data to adjust, reassign the work, and forge ahead until we have 100% compliance.


What This Means


Every student who failed to complete it the first time will be given until January 17 to write a fully developed reader-response essay on a single chapter (“Speaking of Courage”) of The Things They Carried. This will be reassigned through Google Classroom to those students. All the original resources will be included.

After that assignment is reposted, separate revision assignments will be given to those students in the 55% who need to revise. This revision assignment will require students to seek and apply specific feedback about their work. The work must be sufficient, and that threshold has been repeatedly defined: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2409, http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3658.

One other note: Any student who failed to submit the essay to Turnitin must complete that step by January 17. Turnitin submission is required. If there is no Turnitin submission by January 17, the student will experience the same repercussions as those students who do not finish an essay at all.

As to those repercussions: Students who fail to meet the new deadline of January 17 will be moved into the Learning Center for tutoring and/or have Senior Study Halls replaced with regularly scheduled Study Halls. This has already been explained in great detail in the following essential instructional post:

Feedback: In Shambles

As the student’s schedule is changed, the reader’s response will be assigned again with a new deadline. The work will be required to be monitored by a teacher and/or tutor. This will continue until the essay is completed. There will be no exemptions from other ongoing work.

There will also be the usual gamut of messages and meetings. The GAP score for Q2, at that point, will also default to the lowest tier — to remain there until the student finishes the required work in full.

Thumbnail for this post taken from Brian Kesigner’s Instagram.

EQOI: Model Responses with Feedback

The writing process for the reader-response essay on The Things They Carried, which is outlined here and here, includes this scaffolded assignment on the essential questions for the surrounding unit:

Essential Questions: Observations and Insights

This formative assignment organizes student responses to essential questions by subject:

  1. Morality and Adversity
  2. Stories and Identities
  3. Witnesses and Messengers
  4. Now and the Future
  5. Humanity and Inhumanity

Students are then asked to read the documents, discuss their observations, and then write a response. The shape of that response is up to the individual, but the focus must be on analysis and utility — particularly how these observations and insights might help with the reader-response essay.

This is because essential questions link explicitly to the fourth part of reader-response writing:

¶4 concludes by addressing the universality and worldly relevance of the text. This could be a study of essential questions, if you’ve been given those to use. It could be a discussion of why this text is important and should be studied. You might also ask: If the text teaches a moral, why is it crucial for it to be taught? If the concepts raised deserve further study, why is that? Why does this text matter beyond an English classroom?

The rest of this post provides examples of effective student responses to their peers’ work. These examples are all drawn from the work done in 2019.


Model Analysis and Responsive Writing


Start here, with a succinct analysis of one of the batch responses:

What is the relationship between our stories and our identities?
While reading these answers there is a similarity in the way that they both impact our lives. For example, “our stories are the things we have been through and have done. Our stories make up our experiences in life and knowledge on specific aspects where our identities are who we are on the inside. Our morals, feelings, who and how we express ourselves as. The relationship between those in our stories often effect of identities, it could make us more empathetic, ignorant. etc. Depending on our stories.” Another example, “your stories are what make you, you. Past events in your life will have some effect on your current emotions whether it will be happy sad or scare. If you do something good to help other people will remember you for that.” These answers show how they do affect our lives.

This paragraph serves as a precursor to the reader-response essay, and it quotes enough peer work to serve as proof of process, too. Here is another example:

The responses to the Humanity and Inhumanity question seems to be the most varied. Many of us have answered in our own way, some unable to find a real conclusion, others speaking cynically, while others still contemplating the question with a significant amount of depth. The response “No one knows. It’s different from everybody for me? I have lost total faith in humanity” made me really wonder what life this person leads. I consider asking them what made them truly lose all the faith they have, and how they struggled to maintain it in the past. I think the idea that no one knows how to retain their humanity is an untrue statement, especially when surrounded by inhumanity. Many of the other responses suggest being true to oneself, but it’s easy to lose oneself when faced with atrocity or misery. Another suggested faith, distraction, clarity and strength of mind, retaining their composure…what I’ve taken away from reading these responses is that everyone has their own method of keeping their humanity. It isn’t the same for everyone, and it’s harder for some than others. It isn’t just about keeping your faith in humanity, but your own humanity, despite a lack of faith in the humanity in others. The responses to this question brings up an entirely new question to answer: if not you, then whom?

This is obviously helpful, both on its own and during a larger writing process.

The key, as always, is that students who did something gained important feedback on the writing process. Consider this complete set of summaries:

There is not much insight in each paragraph, but it’s enough to garner some feedback. That’s important. Even brief insight can lead to good feedback, like it does here:

The feedback is nearly twice as long as the student’s writing, but the lack of development and depth is obvious; it’s more important that this student did something. There is a good-faith effort to do the work.

In fact, there is even the possible that a student submitting nothing — as in, nothing at all — can, through a small effort, invite some feedback:

This is a misreading of the directions and a circumvention of the work required, but the student wrote a few words to contextualize and explain their choice.

Essential Questions: Observations and Insights

Part of a unit of study called When the Truth Isn’t Sufficient. Preceded by The Age of the EssayWhat Is Literature For?The Practice of Empathy, and Organization: Getting Things Done. These preceding units covered the art and purpose of writing essays and reading literature; the central skill taught through literature, which is empathy; and the substructural organization needed to tackle complex texts and tasks.

Animating quotation by Tim O’Brien, author of the assured novel, The Things They Carried:

That’s what fiction is for. It’s for getting at the truth when the truth isn’t sufficient for the truth.


Essential Questions: Observations and Insights


These questions were assigned separately as part of the required writing for this unit:

  • What is the relationship between our stories and our identities?
  • To what extent are we all witnesses of history and messengers to humanity?
  • To what extent will the decisions we make now affect us and others in the future?
  • How does an individual keep his or her humanity when surrounded by inhumanity?
  • To what extent can we make the “right” moral decision when faced with adversity?

Student responses were collected through a Google Form. Those responses were then collated and reorganized:

This assignment was given to 120 seniors. They had a week in class to discuss these questions and then write their responses.

See Google Classroom for the formal assignment associated with your reading of these responses. Use this post’s comment section to share some of your insights, observations, and questions.

December 6, 2019


Stay Organized


Circle back as often as necessary to the organizational resources from our mini-unit in November:

The most important resources are time in class and feedback from a teacher. Advocate for what you need. You’ll never be denied help.

For a while, some of the printed resources will be fanned out like this: Workshop Materials – Copies. You can zoom in on that image to see the wide range of choices available to you, from essay guides to copies of posts.

Below is another rundown of what to do. Remember that all course-wide feedback, updates, and instructions are dated and posted here: 2019-2020 Specifics.


GAP Q2A


Monday, December 9, is the end of the first panel of Quarter 2. Here is a screenshot, taken on Friday, December 6, of all the formal work due through Google Classroom during that panel:

You were also given digital and physical copies of a December Resource Pack that bridges Q1 and Q2. It’s posted to Google Classroom, the front page of this website, and the side menus. Here it is again:

DECEMBER RESOURCE PACK

Student Calendar [December]
Student Resources
Artifact Feedback Worksheet
GAP Worksheet [Q2A]

The GAP Worksheet [Q2A] lists out every assignment for Q2A as a self-assessment exercise. It contains a checklist. The only change is that the optional revisions of the last river essay were moved to Q2B.

As scores for Q2A are finalized, you’ll be given feedback based around the ideas in this post:

Feedback: In Shambles

You must read this carefully. You should also read the instructional post on sufficient and insufficient work.

The “shambles” post will be printed and distributed for in-class review on 12/9 and 12/10; the rest must be read on your own time.


Reader’s Response Essay


During the two weeks before winter break, you must complete a reader’s response, the specific requirements of which are found in two instructional posts:

  1. The Things They Carried
  2. Required Writing: When the Truth Isn’t Sufficient

The deadline is December 19 for the draft and a Turnitin.com submission. Here is a screenshot of the assignment on Google Classroom:

Note that there are options for students who did not complete the novel. All students can write this reader’s response, regardless of their progress on the novel.

As a component of the writing process, you must also answer five essential questions, which are outlined in the “Required Writing” post. Your responses will fuel discussion, which will shape the reader-response writing.

Copies of the reader-response guide are printed. Here is a direct link: tinyurl.com/maker-readres.


Pareto Projects


Your secondary focus, after the reader-response essay, will be to give feedback to select Pareto Projects. Be sure you have carefully read this post:

The Feedback Chain

You must give feedback in the way you want to receive it. The Golden Rule still applies.

Note that the students presenting or otherwise showcasing their projects this month have volunteered to do so. These works-in-progress will be featured on Fridays, but you will have access to them on other days.

These peers have put themselves out there, and you must respect that effort. You are not required to give feedback; if you do give feedback, however, it must be constructive and empathetic.

This worksheet is a good default mechanism for giving other students feedback on their Pareto Projects: Artifact Feedback Worksheet. Many copies are available in class.

As an example of how to approach this, consider this project:

If that file doesn’t load, here is a direct link to Google Drive: Student Short Fiction – 12/6.

Zoom in to see the extraordinary work done by this student. They created the feedback sheets you see for each piece, just like they prepared the folders and photocopies. All of it is available to anyone interested in reading and providing feedback.

This is where the language of the top-tier profiles comes into play. The eights, those who see a 95 in the gradebook, will embrace the chance to help out a peer with their writing:

An 8 reflects a systemic investment in the course and a desire to do more than just what is required. These students are also collegial, curious, and amenable in ways that galvanize their peers and demonstrably improve the learning environment.

If you want to improve the learning environment, give other students good feedback. Encourage their passion projects. Help them write the reader-response, sure, and keep them focused in class — that galvanizes, too. Pareto Projects are personal, though, and deserve special attention.

More Examples of Sufficient Work

Here again is a guide, with pictures, to help you identify the differences between sufficient work and insufficient work. The post and all its resources assist self-assessment and self-advocacy, especially during the writing process.

Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work

There is another post geared toward Honors- and college-level work that might be useful, but the one embedded above is probably enough. In case it isn’t, this post offers more examples of sufficient work.

Here is a folder of student responses to assignments given in English 12:

There are three responses each to two separate assignments. They are labeled clearly.


Proof of Process: Instructional Posts [Assignment #1]


This first assignment asked students to respond to a series of instructional posts given over several weeks. This is what was posted to Google Classroom:

The three model responses in the provided folder have been reformatted and given some context within the documents themselves.


Response: “In Defense of Distraction” [Assignment #2]


The second assignment asked students to annotate two excerpts from a longer nonfiction article and then to respond in writing. This is what was posted to Google Classroom:

The instructional post contains all of the relevant links:

In Defense of Distraction

Two of the three model responses in the provided folder have been reformatted and given context within the documents themselves. The third is an image, which is reposted below:

Note that this response is unfinished, and the student worries herself if it “completely went off topic.” The teacher’s feedback on the side is included to emphasize how important it is to write enough — to do work sufficient for feedback. That threshold is easy enough to identify.

The Things They Carried

Part of a unit of study called When the Truth Isn’t Sufficient. Preceded by The Age of the Essay, What Is Literature For?, The Practice of Empathy, and Organization: Getting Things Done. These preceding units covered the art and purpose of writing essays and reading literature; the central skill taught through literature, which is empathy; and the substructural organization needed to tackle complex texts and tasks.

Animating quotation by Tim O’Brien, author of the assured novel, The Things They Carried:

That’s what fiction is for. It’s for getting at the truth when the truth isn’t sufficient for the truth.


The Things They Carried


The central text and assured experience for this unit is Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried. Every study has a copy of this, plus plenty of time to read it, before the unit’s official start. Here are some more resources related to the book and its author.

First, the Goodreads page: Tim O’Brien, The Things They Carried. The reviews and responses offer plenty of insight into why this novel is taught so often in English classes.

Second, an excellent piece on NPR’s Talk of the Nation to mark the 20th anniversary of the novel: ‘The Things They Carried,’ 20 Years On. The program is about 30 minutes.

Finally, a more recent piece on O’Brien: Tim O’Brien, a Veteran of War and Fatherhood, Opens Up to His Sons. This is a review of the audiobook of O’Brien’s Dad’s Maybe Book, which is read by the author.

The central work for The Things They Carried is the central work for the entire unit. It is outlined here:

Required Writing: When the Truth Isn’t Sufficient

The reader’s response is the central means of responding to the novel, and that is explored more below.

The best reader-response essays will use a complete reading of the novel, start to finish, as their basis. It’s possible, however, to use selections from the text without having finished the rest. This is absolutely not the best way to explore O’Brien’s writing — but it does allow the inevitable students who don’t read to practice the essay.

Suggested Selection #1: “Ambush” and surrounding chapters

“Ambush” is on page 125 in our edition. We use it as an anchor because we have a recording of it being read by O’Brien himself. Here is a direct link: User Clip: Tim O’Brien Reads Ambush.

The suggested readings around “Ambush” add up 13 pages total. Here they are, with the page numbers from our edition indicated first:

Suggested Selection #2: “The Ghost Soldiers”

“The Ghost Soldiers” is a self-contained story that works well for reader-response writing. It’s 27 pages long and starts on page 180 in our edition.