Category: Triage

No comments

Level Design: In-Class Focus

  By Grade Abatement, Space Explainers, Triage

There are levels here. The first level is the post you are now reading, which offers a simple mandate:

Treat your class time as the rare resource it is, and advocate for yourself early and often.

That’s the surface level. The next level asks you to read just under 300 words on in-class focus. It does not take long.

Leveling Up: Level 1-1

Leveling Up: Level 1-1

Then we get to a level that covers the same material in a little over 800 words.

Leveling Up: Level 2

Leveling Up: Level 2

Finally, you get to a complete unit of study. It clocks in at over 2800 words and incorporates a considerable amount of ramiform reading. It teaches you much more than you think, too.

Leveling Up: Boss Level

Leveling Up: Boss Level

This is done to help you. You need self-discipline, self-awareness, self-control — and if you ever doubt the reasons why, you could look at another set of leveled lectures:

There are levels. Get as far as you can.

No comments

66 Minutes

  By 2020-2021, Distance Learning, Feedback, Grade Abatement, Space Explainers, Triage

If you were to look at all the categories assigned to this post, you’d see it covers everything from grade abatement to feedback to triage. Looking through those categories isn’t the point today, though; the links are there to emphasize that the post you are reading is important. Very, very important. Use-an-empty-adverb-and-italicize-it important.

The central concept here is that you must maximize your work for the 66 minutes of class time allotted this year. You’ll have breaks built in, including breaks you can schedule yourself; the rest of the time must be fully focused on our work.

You’ll have a flexible set of guidelines for this, which you can load below:

That schedule is printed and posted in the classroom, too. This post provides context. You will start with a list of instructional posts that have something in common.

You do not need to read these, because they are assigned when needed; several of them, in fact, have been sent in concert with the post you are reading now.

Again and again, these posts circle back, like so many falcons in the widening gyre, to in-class focus and feedback. Those are the keys.

The feedback in question is more than the feedback you receive on work. It’s the instructional feedback chain that you need to learn and to grow. You cannot be successful without sustained in-class focus and a habit of reading — closely reading — every instructional post, guide, letter, and comment.

This year, 2020-2021, you are physically present for our course only once a week. The odd Wednesday you attend will be dedicated to the Pareto Project. This is a strange schedule for a strange year.

Here are multiple versions of the full scope and sequence of the year:

What this exhaustive planning drives home for me is also what it should drive home for you:

  1. We spend the first four months of the year practicing and hopefully mastering the skills, traits, and processes of authentic learning.
  2. Only if you have built those foundations can you use the final five months to create extraordinary work.
  3. You cannot build anything in this space without serious in-class focus, especially on interstitial feedback and instruction.

In other words, if you do not make the most of your in-class focus, and if you do not invest fully in the instructional framework of this course, you cannot be successful.

Each week, you meet for just 66 minutes in person for a period of intense focus. This will include conferences, in-person workshops, presentations, lectures, and class discussions. You must make active, thoughtful choices.

There will be just 33 minutes additionally of at-home focus. This will include synchronous activities like discussions, lectures, and peer presentations. Distance learners can extend this beyond the required 33 minutes. You must make the best of the situation.

Again, you have access to a schedule for this:

Wednesdays will always be set aside for “genius hour” passion projects. Students who are on the schedule will workshop their projects, in person or remotely; the other students have the option of asynchronous feedback through Drive, Docs, or a meeting during office hours.

Overall, there is a limited amount of time for the critical in-person work on writing, reading, and the other Humanities skills and traits. You must, therefore, direct yourself outside of class time to prepare for in-person feedback and workshops.

If you do nothing else, you must treat the 66 minutes of in-person time as sacrosanct: You must do good, authentic Humanities work while you are in the classroom.

This is possible. 66 minutes is just 0.65% of your entire week. If you happen to be in person on Wednesday, too, that percentage doubles to just 1.3% of your life over seven days.

You can dedicate a single percentage of your time each week to this space. And a strange thing will happen, when you do: You will find it easier to dedicate more time outside of this space to this work. You will find the work more meaningful. It will be easier.

This is the trick of it: The more you invest in the class, the more you benefit; the more you benefit, the more you will want to invest in the class, and the easier it will be to do so. Authenticity and understanding stack.

Once more, here is the post that breaks down your 66-minute periods for 2020-2021:

  1. This is the text that you’ll find reprinted below, almost verbatim. ↩

No comments

Terms and Conditions

  By Grade Abatement, Space Explainers, Triage

Dima Yarovinsky, “I Agree” (2018)

Meeting the Course on Its Own Terms

Every instructional post, however long or short, has a thesis1. The thesis of the post you are now reading:

You must meet this course on its own terms.

But it’s not just that you must meet the course on its own terms; you must also stop yourself from substituting your own terms and using your own assumptions.

This is true for every stakeholder, not just students. Innovation requires a good-faith investment from parents, administrators, interested teachers, and anyone else who cares about student learning. There is too much bad faith out there already.

You can start with this quotation:

The challenge is to set up systems that allow students to follow their interests. People tend to dichotomize approaches in education: The teacher is either telling students what to do, or standing back and letting them figure it out. I think that’s a false choice: The issue is not structure versus no structure, but rather creating a different structure. Students need to be exposed to new ideas and learn how to persist. They also need support.
~Tony Wagner, Creating Innovators

This course uses just such a unique structure.

For the first part of the year, students learn how to learn. They are exposed to new ideas and helped to master important skills and traits. They explore the expected reading and writing of ELA as they learn universal tools and processes.

During the first part of the year, individual feedback is given alongside a framework of instructional, interstitial writing. Students are assessed through a unique, profile-based system based on universal skills and traits.

For the second part of the year, students put their skills and traits to work on a series of projects in the Humanities: reading and responding to literature; writing research-driven essays; public speaking and letter-writing; and the student-driven “genius hour” projects that can be tied into the final exam.

I would usually fill paragraphs like those last three with hyperlinks to demonstrate that each element of this structure supports the rest in improving student learning. That is what you’ll see everywhere else in this post, as well as everywhere else on this site.

In this case, however, the lack of links is there to emphasize the thesis we’re working with: You must meet this course on its own terms, and you cannot replace those terms and conditions with your own.

In Good Faith

You can always look to the testimonials and history of the course to dispel any misinformation or disinformation. If you act in good faith, honestly looking to understand what we do, you can avoid low-information sepsis.

Even when you are informed, you must still face down your assumptions. If you’re a student, some of those assumptions are that you will be spoon-fed information; that you will be asked to regurgitate facts and insight on tests; and that the teacher should perform in front of you, Keating-style, to hold your attention.

In this course, the teacher interacts with students constantly and responsively through writing. This is part and parcel of the course. We meet in person regularly; there is constant, feedback on student work; and every period is designed as a workshop in which students collaborate with the teacher and peers. The use of the written word, however, is paramount: Writing is the most essential act in the Humanities.

This is also about teaching in a new way instead of capitulating to outdated assumptions about learning. I’m thinking specifically about “Teaching as an Amusing Activity,” the tenth chapter in Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death, which gives us the following quotation:

We may take as our guide here John Dewey’s observation that the content of a lesson is the least important thing about learning. As he wrote in Experience and Education: “Perhaps the greatest of all pedagogical fallacies is the notion that a person learns only what he is studying at the time. Collateral learning in the way of formation of enduring attitudes… may be and often is more important than the spelling lesson or lesson in geography or history… For these attitudes are fundamentally what count in the future.” In other words, the most important thing one learns is always something about how one learns. As Dewey wrote in another place, we learn what we do.

That is embedded on the homepage, in the course syllabus, and throughout the course. It is the essential philosophy of effective education: a focus on the process, not just the product.

Postman goes on in that chapter to explain that performative, entertainment-based education is like watching television — a passive act that mostly teaches you how to watch, not learn. If you’re a student, your learning cannot passive, because it is most importantly about you. You must be an active agent in the process of creating those “enduring attitudes.”

This course rejects the “rapid emergence of a new education based on the speed-of-light electronic image,” as Postman predicted decades ago, and embraces instead “the slow-moving printed word.” The computer screen is just the medium for the written word.

Look at our guide to writing, especially at the quotations that are used to illustrate each universal component:

The first quotation is in Latin and elevated to the top of the guide. It is the philosophy of a Humanities makerspace: Verba volant, scripta manent. Spoken words fly away, while written words remain.

And that brings us back to one of the most ineluctable terms and conditions of the course:

You must read what is written.

This isn’t unique to a makerspace, of course. Textbooks must be read, lectures must be heard, videos must be watched, etc. Whatever a teacher uses for instruction must be honored in good faith.

The difference here is what this kind of interstitial instruction requires — and what it does to help students.

The first advantage of this kind of carefully constructed instruction is that it teaches students how to write and how to read. This is Dewey’s idea of enduring habits and self-efficacy: It is more important to build skills and traits than to internalize knowledge.

So the instruction is not just informational. It adds more to student learning than other forms of flipped instruction.

The post you are reading right now is an example: It is designed to model effective writing and to strengthen close reading. It repeatedly invites students to learn more about philosophy. It defines new vocabulary. It varies style and rhetoric to invite emulation.

The second advantage is that the work stacks. The more students read this kind of writing, the faster their writing and reading improves. Paul Graham puts it this way: “[T]he more you learn, the more hooks you have for new facts to stick onto — which means you accumulate knowledge at what’s colloquially called an exponential rate.”

These posts are meant to build habits, not simply impart facts and directions. This is the key.

Contrasting Space

A contrast is found on the whiteboards used regularly in the physical classroom. (You can take a tour of that space online.) Whiteboard writing is temporary by design, unlike everything else written to students.

Here is an example of the whiteboards in Room 210, taken from the week of September 21, 2020 (and presented with all the glares and discoloration you’d expect):

The first whiteboard allows us to talk in person, early in the year, about how feedback works. It is a visual reference for me to use during discussions and individual conferences, too.

The phrase “feedback chain” is a reference to a post: The Feedback Chain. That post is essential reading.

The metaphor on the whiteboard is “[c]loning the teacher and instruction,” with a note that this is done “via flipped and interstitial writing, video, and audio.” This is a summary of how this site and most other feedback works: It effectively clones the teacher, freeing up class time for more individual and small-group discussion.

The second whiteboard is an overview of current course work, circa 9/23/20. Since this is also from early in the year, it contains significant emphasis on the backbone of the course — which is, again, the way a student interacts with letters, posts, guides, and other teacher-written materials.

That metaphor — a fairly clichéd “backbone” metaphor — is also found in the letter given to students at the start of school in 2020:

Letters like that work on multiple levels. One is, again, to teach writing and reading through exposure; another is to emphasize the terms of the course in order to invite more reading, thinking, and writing. Here are the first three paragraphs of that letter, reprinted because they evoke Neil Postman’s prescient analysis of education:

This letter will be read to you in class. It is available online, too, to illustrate its central argument, which is that reading letters like this is the most critical skill in our course and the most important element of your growth in the skills and traits that matter most.

The backbone of this course is its instructional method, which is based in reading and taking notes on what you read. The difference between students who benefit tremendously from this space and students who struggle is their investment in this instructional method.

You also have access to face-to-face meetings, of course, plus scheduled visits to office hours, virtual meetings in class, and just about any form of written back-and-forth you can think of. The online instructional method does not exist in a vacuum, and there are dozens of ways to make it work for you or to supplement it with additional instruction.

The bolded clause is another condition of the course: If you invest in reading the posts, letters, guides, and so on, you will improve the skills and traits that matter most. For students, this is the backbone of learning. You’ll gain the information you need, but you’ll more importantly deepen your ability to learn.

In other words, it’s not just about becoming a better reader and write, but improving in all the skills and traits that matter.

2020 also featured the first attempt at an FAQ driven by student questions early in the year:

Each response models effective writing, and the interlocking links and references promote close reading. The length of the FAQ requires students to organize their time, and the new ideas and insights require critical thinking.

The FAQ is, therefore, designed not just to answer questions but to teach students more about how they learn.

Contrast this with more forms of flipped instruction, especially most video-based instruction, which transmits information and insight that is independent of the medium used. The medium isn’t the message; the goal of a video lecture, for instance, is not to help students create their own video lectures.

Here, the medium is the message: Every written post, guide, FAQ response, etc, is constructed to model effective writing for students. Each one is written specifically to invite emulation. Each is also written with meta-commentary to identify what students should be learning.

That’s why a post might link to the definition of terms a student might not know2. It’s why the use of rhetorical strategies is made transparent, with definitions or examples provided through meta-commentary. It’s a different kind of writing.

The Conclusion

The conclusion is a proven one:

The more students read the instructional writing of this course, the more they will improve as students.

For non-student stakeholders, the conclusion would be that delving into the course writings will erase every concern and illuminate every success. A good-faith effort to learn about what we do will reward that faith with ironclad data and evidence; a bad-faith dismissal of what we do reinforces ignorance and resistance.

If you are a student, each and every letter, post, guide, and comment is designed to expose you to effective writing so you can learn from it. It’s not just about embracing the slow pace of the written word or deepening your thinking; it’s about the oldest form of learning, which is to copy what you see.

This is the age of the essay, as people like Paul Graham noted 15 years ago. It is the age of online discourse. In here, you read that kind of writing as part of each assignment, which builds the skills and traits you need. You read what you are later asked to write.

The reading must be pervasive, too. It needs to be part of every day. That is why the term for this is interstitial. You can access the course at any time, from any device that can get onto the Web.

Look up the literal definition of the term interstitial and apply it to your learning. You can read a post, FAQ, or letter whenever you have a chunk of time. You can read the text in sections, jump from one section to another, or linger over one section until it is clear. You can ask questions privately or publicly. You can read answers on your own time, too.

That means that you do not need to be physically present in a classroom to benefit from the instruction. You do not always need to consume the instructional materials in one sitting, either. You can be anywhere, and as long as you have a device with an Internet connection, you can practice close reading, absorb strategies for effective writing, and deepen your knowledge in the Humanities.

Along with that interstitial instructional model, we have grade abatement and makerspace-based projects to weather almost any storm. These are our building blocks. They work in concert. It all rests on the writing, however.

I think the best way to understand this is to read what students gain from this approach. This, too, emphasizes writing as central. Another of Neil Postman’s insights is that writing, because of its permanence, gets us closer to the truth; for students, their own writing is the vehicle for truth.

That said, it is also important to highlight what students stand to lose, especially now:

A Glass Case Full of Lost Treasures and Fossils

  1. The two linked examples also demonstrate the way instruction is explicitly differentiated. Students can access the course at a level that is appropriate for them. If there is a lengthier, more detailed version of an instructional post, it is for stronger or more invested students. The depth is responsive to student needs and interest. ↩

  2. In this “Terms and Conditions” post, for instance, you’ve gotten prescient and ineluctable. Vocabulary is about encountering words in context, as one of the FAQ responses details; an instructional text, however, might link directly to the definition. ↩

No comments

Finding Your Motivation

  By 22–23 Resources, Final Projects, Triage

Drive and Motivation

Grade abatement eliminates the worst of the impact of traditional grades, but there is still a score in the gradebook every three weeks or so. There just isn’t any illusion about how grades act as a vector for the most toxic parts of education.

We also have no illusions about how hard it is to make the right decision. How do you motivate yourself outside of that number?  How do you improve without a grade? And what do you do when even clicking on the links that answer these questions feels too difficult?

Continue reading

No comments

Leveling Up: Level 2

  By Grade Abatement, Space Explainers, Triage

Grade abatement tracks your learning through profiles, which contain predictable and consistent language about universal skills, traits, and knowledge. Every three weeks, a profile score delivers an evaluation and a blueprint for improvement, and this is part of a much more robust and embedded form of feedback.

Each of those hyperlinks demonstrates the depth of the system. There are levels to this. The more invested you are, the more rewarding the learning is, as if a second course was contained within the first one.

That first course sometimes requires old approaches. It sometimes becomes necessary to track the value each of you adds to or subtracts from the learning environment on a moment-by-moment basis, and we will do this through the gamification of in-class choices.

TL;DR, or the gist of this shift:

  1. You must meet a goal of almost 100% focus when you are in the physical classroom.
  2. If you are off-task or unfocused, you trigger negative consequences.
  3. If you are on-task and focused during class, you will be successful.

This is your space, and you are old enough not to blame others for how it functions. Learning to own your choices is part of the curriculum. You can read the full version of this post to understand more:

Each day, you should go out of your way to appear focused. If you actually are focused, you don’t have anything to worry about. The work is robust and responsive enough to take care of your learning. Otherwise, you might want to fake it, as the second excerpt in this handout explains:

You have been given the tools to be productive — or, at least, to fake productivity long enough for a few positive benefits. Log into your school-issued Chromebooks, for instance, and know that the school’s 1984-inspired Securly software will monitor your focus. These reports can be run at any time to identify if you’re treating the space as a study hall.

That’s the digital trail. You can also use the physical space effectively by choosing a different seat at the start of class or by organizing your workspace deliberately to minimize distractions.

You must focus, in other words, and be obvious and even ostentatious about focusing. If it looks like you’re focused, you are. If it looks like you’re not focused, then you’re not.

For more on why “focus” is an essential skill for all citizens, read below:

When we track your choices, good and bad, any mention of tally marks is conceptual or metaphorical. If it helps to literalize it, however, you can:

Positive contributions correspond to upper-tier profiles: galvanizing actions, creative collaboration, insightful self-assessment, that sort of thing. Doing more than just what’s required boosts your learning, the learning of others, and the products of the space.

Here is a partial list of what triggers a metaphorical red mark:

  • Inability to sustain focus
  • Inability to think critically
  • Inability to self-direct
  • Inability to self-assess

We could also pull a representative list from the essay excerpt on Occam’s razor and faking it. Those metaphorical tally marks indicate

  • watching sports highlights;
  • scrolling through social media;
  • completing a Social Studies presentation;
  • researching prom dresses;
  • looking up dirt bikes;
  • playing a game on your phone; or
  • having an in-depth but off-task conversation.

As you rack up poor choices, you’ll eventually tip the scales. You’ll go go from non-heap to heap, and then there are repercussions. These have already been established as separate from GAP scores. Some repercussions happen in class:

  • Assigned seat
  • Restricted access to technology
  • Additional daily check-in
  • Individual work contract

But if you’re wasting time in the workspace, you must pay back that time. You’ve cost yourself. Again, the TL;DR or gist of this shift:

  1. You must meet a goal of almost 100% focus when you are in the physical classroom.
  2. If you are off-task or unfocused for a significant percentage of class time, you trigger negative consequences.
  3. If you are on-task and focused during class, you will be successful.

You have to make up the time you waste, not just to insure you’re getting the work done, and not just to insure that you are ready for the future, but because you owe the space that time. This, too, is mostly metaphorical, but it can become literal. In that case, you may have to pay back the time wasted.

Again, this is all designed to promote your learning. Here is a partial list of what can happen:

  • Interventions or meetings with Guidance
  • Interventions or meetings with administration
  • Mandated one-on-one conferences before or after school
  • Schedule change: SSH → Study Hall
  • Schedule change: SSH → tutoring in Learning Center

You don’t need hundreds of metaphorical tally marks for us to justify helping you; you need only to have demonstrated that you are struggling with the skills and traits required in a learning environment.

No comments

Leveling Up: Boss Level

  By Grade Abatement, Space Explainers, Triage

You must build up your life action by action, and be content if each one achieves its goal as far as possible — and no one can keep you from this.
–Marcus Aurelius

The unit on akrasia is a staple of any course taught in the makerspace. It is defined as a lack of self-control or the state of acting against one’s better judgment, and we study it empathetically and preventatively — although the central metaphor of that unit (a guillotine) isn’t exactly subtle.

Yet it truly is an empathetic lesson, in the end, which is why the readings are about overcoming our human failings. The excerpt from You Are Not So Smart, for instance, is about treating procrastination as a battle with a natural part of your brain. You have to outwit a part of yourself.

That doesn’t mean you should just accept bad choices, of course. You should accept only that there is a part of you that you must understand in order to overcome it — a human part that makes poor choices from time to time. Your job, as a student, is to master that part while realizing this:

That’s another article dealing with akrasia, even if the word itself is never used, and it’s a good article, in that it never pretends expertise, yet offers plenty of guidance and insight. It has a simple, memorable hook borrowed from an advertising slogan, but it’s more memorable for the way it attacks different excuses for inaction, one by one, in order to suggest that even the simplest steps to improve can bring clarity.

In a Humanities makerspace, the simplest steps are what matter. You are building a version of yourself through your choices. You are quite literally rebuilding your brain. If the most important thing we learn is always something about how we learn, then your personal blueprint is always evolving.

With that in mind, this lecture takes aim at two elements of the learning environment: first, how your individual choices are tracked; second, what happens after those choices are tallied (metaphorically, in most cases). This post also serves to explore some of the fundamental issues of motivation and action in our space.

TL;DR, or the gist of this shift:

  1. You must meet a goal of almost 100% focus when you are in the physical classroom.
  2. If you are off-task or unfocused for a significant percentage of class time — a percentage you do not dictate, by the way — you will trigger negative consequences.
  3. If you are on-task and focused during class, however, you will be successful.

See Leveling Up: Level 1-2 for a shorter version of this. There is also an even shorter version here.

There are also related lectures on the need for greater focus as you get older:

Let’s review the space and its approach to learning:

You have unprecedented freedom and flexibility. The terms of your learning are clear, and your menu of choices is constantly updated. From the syllabus through our study of literature to the second semester’s provisional setup, you are given projects you design and pursue at your own pace. This includes the college essay in the fall, your required Senior Talk in the spring, and even the required English 12 research paper.

You can take risks, as always, because you’re evaluated on skills and traits that encourage risk and growth. There are no immutable deadlines. Feedback is built into every lesson.

The beginnings of the course prepare you for this project-based work — not just by honing the skills of writing and reading, but through a broader study of skills like organization. We even study why you sometimes make bad choices to give you the skills to self-monitor and self-direct.

Whether you are at the start of this process or about to finish it, one requirement remains the same: You must spend close to 100% of every class period focused and productive. Given your options, this should be easy. You aren’t imprisoned with a chain gang, staring down a day of hard labor in the rock quarry. This is authentic, project-based learning. It’s inspired by the best research and innovation we have access to.

In fact, it’s truly brain-boggling that any student would look at this Humanities makerspace, at its extraordinary flexibility, at the heaps of evidence about how it connects to the future, and then say, “This just doesn’t work for me.” That’s more than a gap in knowledge. It’s got to be caused by more than the usual half-lidded rumor-mongering.

This course can always adjust to provide what an individual student needs, and it can almost always do that through what a student wants. Each element, from the profiles for assessment to the universal process for essay-writing, promotes individualization.

Once you realize what that sort of makerspace-inspired, project-based learning means and what the Humanities actually do (versus how they’ve been crippled by historical accident), the possibilities are about as endless as they get in a public high school.

One of 2020’s graduating seniors, for example, spent the end of the year meeting the goals of their project-based work through a more traditional setup: an online, automated, book-driven course of study that could have been lifted from a 1995 English classroom. That’s what was best for him, so that’s what we did.

One of his peers, meanwhile, studied video game lore and posted his writing process to Reddit for authentic, crowd-sourced feedback. He went on to analyze how video game narratives might meet the criteria for literary merit, and his Reddit-inspired work led directly to a robust, real-world research paper.

Still another peer spent time analyzing the drum tracks of heavy metal songs as part of a research project into autodidactic musicianship — teaching himself to drum like the best, in other words. He was inspired, in part, by a classmate who used Genius.com to analyze contemporary hip-hop in order to produce his own rap lyrics.

We are able to do this kind of atypical work because the systems of the course are so meticulously designed, because the instructions and resources are fully front-loaded, and because the assessment is profile-based. The building blocks are there. The work can be as traditional or experimental as we want it to be.

And if a student can’t figure out on their own how to navigate this course, somebody on our team of teachers and counselors will do it. We will review, discuss, and individualize every element of the learning environment until it works. Again, the building blocks of the course give us that kind of modular flexibility.

Which brings us back to the choices you make during each class period:

  1. You must meet a goal of almost 100% focus when you are in the physical classroom.
  2. If you are off-task or unfocused, bad things are going to happen.
  3. If you are on-task and focused during class, good things are going to happen.

When you put in the required time and effort, this space works. It does what it says on the tin. It prepares you for college or a career, guides you through a study of the Humanities, and invites you to learn more about yourself.

Your choices are, of course, still yours to make, so we’ll also work on advocacy over blaming others. Blame is just as self-destructive as Brené Brown thinks. As she says, it’s an expression of frustration and discomfort, and it kills relationships and empathy.

In here, blaming others does even more damage. It encourages you to avoid any uncomfortable feedback about your performance, which means rejecting the opportunity to improve yourself. Instead of growth, you face stagnation.

Or worse: You can only continue down that path for so long before you become this guy, who fought so hard against evidence and logic that he turned the backfire effect into a literal explosion.

The goal, therefore, is to make every student invest in the class period, because that investment will pay off. Here is an older essay that discusses the importance of in-class focus when you have just 40 minutes (give or take) each day:

The class period is the crux of your learning. In our high school, during most years, those periods are approximately 40 minutes long. During the insanity of the coronavirus pandemic, we had to overhaul the in-person schedule and overall calendars dramatically, leading to entire posts just about the 66 minutes available to us.

Ultimately, the exact number of minutes we spend together is irrelevant to this post. All of this expansive online material is there to enable more time for face-to-face instruction and feedback, and if you read what you’re asked to read when you’re asked to read it, we can shift easily into the mentality of the makerspace.

That’s why flipped instruction was developed, in fact, and why it was further developed in this space into “interstitial” learning. A letter on the subject starts off each year.

You should be prepping outside of class, scheduling the instructional posts around your schedule, and then using the classroom as a workshop. It helps to meet every day. We could make it work once a week, however, or around any other schedule.

Read this excerpt from a longer essay on the makerspace:

Those two excerpts are part of the grade abatement process, as well. In this post, they highlight how straightforward the choice is to use your time wisely, how it connects directly to your growth and success, and how you should fake it, if you have to.

The first excerpt, “Occam’s Razor(s),” discusses the choices you make each day. It’s about the “slow, steady concatenation of evidence,” where concatenation refers to almost every action you take. In the end, however, you are one type of student or another, and some choices weigh more than others.

The second excerpt, “Faking It,” is about tricking your brain into remembering that it loves to learn, loves to create, loves feedback, etc. The hook is there; sometimes you just have to force yourself to listen. If you fake it long enough, you will build good habits.

It may help to note that school is performative by design. Performance-based assessment is a net positive, for instance, and when the assessment model is driven by in-class making, like ours, you can manufacture a lot of the necessary momentum.

You can also default to the basics, if that makes more sense to you. You could choose to do literary criticism and to write an MLA-formatted essay straight out of that 1995 classroom. That’s fine. You can write five-paragraph essays, read the canonical books most seniors read, and churn out literary and rhetorical analysis. All that teaches many useful skills, and it will get you, for lack of a better term, credit.

You could, on the other hand, do contemporary research into cults, like one student did in 2019, and then connect that research to a novel about the world of Far Cry 5. You could explore the connections between video game narratives and canonical storytelling. You could research interactive storytelling.

That Far Cry example is much more authentic and interesting, yet it remains completely immersed in a love of stories and the power of reading. It also gets at the essential questions that matter: How do people fall into cults? What does that tell us about ourselves? Questions like that drive your learning.

If this extraordinary amount of agency and unequaled level of choice fail you, that is a shame. It means you are in shambles, and those shambles have a particular look:

When you hit that shambolic state, it’s a matter of forcing you to use class time effectively until the course works for you. We have to electrify the Skinner box to get you out of it.

From a certain point of view, those mechanisms offer a balance to the project-based learning and individualized attention of the rest of the curriculum. The latter is based on the real world and speaks to autonomy, self-awareness, self-direction. The Skinner box is the necessary evil: a real-time reward or penalty for certain choices.

Grade abatement profiles reward the choice to fight your akratic instinct, but they reward it over time. In the moment, gamification may work. You can research the concept (perhaps as part of a research-driven essay, or as the subject of a river essay), or you can read this quick overview of it.

In here, the gamified element is the tally of your choices in real time. We measure the value added and the value subtracted by your actions. This does not need to be literal.

As the next section explains, the value of your actions is the same as it ever was, and you’ve been told since you were very young what is appropriate and what isn’t in a classroom. You’ll learn how our gamification works through practice, too, which is a bit like what happens when you fire up a video game like Super Mario Bros. on the NES.

You learn to focus as you make choices. Does it hurt you to play a game on your phone with 60 seconds left in class? Probably not, but we’ll see when you try it. Does it boost your performance to volunteer to share your progress with the class? Definitely, and you’ll know that when you receive positive feedback.

Here is what that tally would look like if it were literal:

Again, you’ll learn by doing, and you already know, after a decade in this public-school Skinner box, what is expected of you. There shouldn’t be a need to scratch out tally marks to motivate you. This is much better used conceptually.

Black tally marks reflect choices that correspond to those upper-tier profiles: galvanizing actions, creative collaboration, insightful self-assessment, that sort of thing. Doing more than just what’s required will be noted, for instance.

As for what triggers one of those metaphorical, red tally marks? Here is a list from a post on this sort of thing:

  • Inability to sustain focus
  • Inability to think critically
  • Inability to self-direct
  • Inability to self-assess

Or you could work off of the not-at-all comprehensive list in the excerpt you read earlier:

  • Watching sports highlights
  • Scrolling through social media
  • Completing a Social Studies presentation
  • Researching prom dresses
  • Looking up dirt bikes
  • Playing a game on your phone
  • Having an in-depth conversation about music

First, an important note on all of these choices: They could theoretically be folded into your project-based work. That’s how flexible this approach is. It would take foresight, front-loading, and discussion, but you could explore almost any interest you have through this classroom.

Otherwise, your akratic choices add up. You’ll eventually tip the scales, go from non-heap to heap, and then there are repercussions. You’re already familiar with what can happen. Some repercussions happen in class:

  • Assigned seat
  • Restricted access to technology
  • Additional daily check-in
  • Individual work contract

But if you’re wasting time in class, you have to make up that time. You will fall behind, otherwise. Back to the gist of this focus:

  1. You must meet a goal of almost 100% focus when you are in the physical classroom.
  2. If you are off-task or unfocused enough, bad things happen.
  3. If you are on-task and focused during class, good things happen.

You have to put in the time, and not just to insure you’re getting the work done. It’s also that you owe this space 36–40 minutes of your time. When something has been this painstakingly built to provide you what you need, you owe it the bare minimum you owe every class, which is something approaching 40 minutes. Gratitude is good for you, too.

The repercussions you’ll face when you level up enough akratic choices will mostly be implemented through your Senior Study Halls, which can be repurposed for any of the following:

  • Interventions or meetings with Guidance
  • Interventions or meetings with administration
  • Mandated one-on-one conferences before or after school
  • Schedule change: SSH → Study Hall
  • Schedule change: SSH → tutoring in Learning Center

You don’t need hundreds of metaphorical tally marks for us to justify helping you; you need only to have demonstrated that you are struggling with the skills and traits required in a learning environment.

Each day, you should go out of your way to appear focused. If you actually are focused, you don’t have anything to worry about. The work is robust and responsive enough to take care of your learning. Otherwise, you might want to fake it, as the second excerpt in this handout explains:

You have been given the tools to be productive — or, at least, to fake productivity long enough for a few positive benefits. Log into your school-issued Chromebooks, for instance, and know that the school’s 1984-inspired Securly software will monitor your focus. These reports can be run at any time, by parents or faculty, and quickly identify if you’re treating the space as a workshop:

Or a study hall:

That’s the digital trail. You can also use the physical space effectively by choosing a different seat at the start of class or by organizing your workspace deliberately to minimize distractions.

Focus, in other words, and be obvious and even ostentatious about focusing. If it looks like you’re focused, you are. If it looks like you’re not focused, then you’re not.

No comments

January 11, 2020

  By 2019-2020, Triage

This post concerns itself mostly with the reader-response essay on The Things They Carried, which is part of the writing work outlined here. It is also an important look at how the average student handles deadlines and directions. It should be read with both concerns in mind.

Reader-Response Essay: Background and The Things They Carried

We began reading The Things They Carried in mid-November. The formal writing assignments were posted online on December 3 at this address: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3517. The details of the required essay, the titular reader’s response, were posted on December 5: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3514.

To help students write the essay, they were given essential questions to answer by December 6. Three days later, on December 9, they were given model responses to these essential questions to use in the writing process: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3683.

The formal essay prompt was also posted to Google Classroom on December 6. The deadline was given as December 19.

For students who did not do the required reading of The Things They Carried, multiple alternative options were provided: the four chapters spanning pages 118-130; “Speaking of Courage,” which starts on page 131; or “The Ghost Soldiers,” which starts on page 180.

Collected in the formal essay assignment were a bevy of resources. Students had access to an instructional post detailing the reader-response process (http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3013); a printed and online guide to writing a reader-response essay (https://tinyurl.com/maker-readres); and a modified chart to use to brainstorm and outline (https://tinyurl.com/reader-res-chart).

Students were also given multiple digital resources for the novel (http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3514) and another copy of our universal writing guide (https://tinyurl.com/sisyphus-writes).

One of the last requirements for this assignment was to submit a copy of the essay to Turnitin.com. Directions for this were covered in class, included on Google Classroom, and posted online: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=1434.

Adjustments and Modifications: “Speaking of Courage”

On December 17, two days before the deadline for these essays, a work-in-progress grade was posted to Infinite Campus. All students and stakeholders were sent a letter explaining these WIP scores and detailing the current assignment: https://tinyurl.com/stakeholders-121719. A copy of the letter was also shared on Google Classroom:

The deadline came on December 19. Students who failed to meet this deadline were immediately given the chance to advocate for extensions and modifications. These meetings took place on December 19 and December 20.

If the assignment was modified, students were required to read only one chapter, “Speaking of Courage,” in order to write their reader’s response. The essay parameters remained in place; because of the nature of O’Brien’s novel, however, a single chapter can be used for a reader-response essay without losing too much effectiveness.

Here is a screenshot of just one class period’s modified assignments as they were posted:

The deadlines were selected by the students themselves, with a hard cap of January 10, which is the start of Q2C. The complete schedule of GAP panels (as in the panels of a triptych) is here: https://tinyurl.com/gap-calendar-19.

Results: January 11, 2020

On January 11, a complete report was run for all student submissions. This deliberately coincides with the Q2B grade abatement profiles posted that weekend to Infinite Campus for the time frame/panel of 12/10/19–1/9/20.

There are 116 senior students in the makerspace this year. For this assignment, ten students had (or have) individualized expectations — extensions through the end of January; exemptions due to unique circumstances; alternative assignments developed in meetings with Guidance, parents, and administration; and so on.

106 students were, therefore, responsible for the reader-response essay that was due at some point between December 19 and January 10. Every student had the opportunity to request an extension or modification, per the rules of a grade-abated Humanities makerspace.

It is important to emphasize this timeline: January 10 was five weeks after the reader-response essay was assigned and two months after students began reading The Things They Carried. After the original deadline of December 19, we were all off for a two-week winter break; there were no other ongoing assignments for English 12 over the break, given students even more time to complete late work.

Equally important: The reader-response essay is an assured experience for English 12 students. So is the novel. These are two ineluctable elements of the English 12 curriculum. They are required. Even without student self-advocacy and a self-selected extension deadline, late work would have been accepted and given feedback.

And, again, students themselves selected the due date for their modified assignments. Any alterations to those self-selected deadlines were honored. All it took — all it ever takes — is student initiative.

The results: As of January 11, 48 of 106 students had not written a reader-response essay. 45% of students did not complete a required assignment.

It is notable that fully 100% of these 48 students have applied to college and, in many cases, been accepted. They plan to matriculate, each and every one, in the fall of 2020.

That statistic, 45%, lines up with what we know about students who aren’t ready for college. In 2014, most college students didn’t earn a degree in four years; more recent studies have the official six-year graduation percentage around 60%:

The official four-year graduation rate for students attending public colleges and universities is 33.3%. The six-year rate is 57.6%. At private colleges and universities, the four-year graduation rate is 52.8%, and 65.4% earn a degree in six years… Looking at national figures, you can see six-year graduation rates:

– Full-time, first-time students: 59.2%
– Transfer, full-time students: 58.9%
– Transfer, part-time students: 37.7%
– First-time, part-time students: 17.7%

The 40% or so who haven’t done an essay for their English 12 class match up with the 40% or so who don’t graduate from college. It’s why this makerspace leans so heavily on universal skills, traits, and knowledge: Without those basics, students won’t be successful next year. So we use these data to adjust, reassign the work, and forge ahead until we have 100% compliance.

What This Means

Every student who failed to complete it the first time will be given until January 17 to write a fully developed reader-response essay on a single chapter (“Speaking of Courage”) of The Things They Carried. This will be reassigned through Google Classroom to those students. All the original resources will be included.

After that assignment is reposted, separate revision assignments will be given to those students in the 55% who need to revise. This revision assignment will require students to seek and apply specific feedback about their work. The work must be sufficient, and that threshold has been repeatedly defined: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2409, http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=3658.

One other note: Any student who failed to submit the essay to Turnitin must complete that step by January 17. Turnitin submission is required. If there is no Turnitin submission by January 17, the student will experience the same repercussions as those students who do not finish an essay at all.

As to those repercussions: Students who fail to meet the new deadline of January 17 will be moved into the Learning Center for tutoring and/or have Senior Study Halls replaced with regularly scheduled Study Halls. This has already been explained in great detail in the following essential instructional post:

Feedback: In Shambles

As the student’s schedule is changed, the reader’s response will be assigned again with a new deadline. The work will be required to be monitored by a teacher and/or tutor. This will continue until the essay is completed. There will be no exemptions from other ongoing work.

There will also be the usual gamut of messages and meetings. The GAP score for Q2, at that point, will also default to the lowest tier — to remain there until the student finishes the required work in full.

Thumbnail for this post taken from Brian Kesigner’s Instagram.

No comments

More Examples of Sufficient Work

  By Skill-Building, Triage

Here again is a guide, with pictures, to help you identify the differences between sufficient work and insufficient work. The post and all its resources assist self-assessment and self-advocacy, especially during the writing process.

Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work

There is another post geared toward Honors- and college-level work that might be useful, but the one embedded above is probably enough. In case it isn’t, this post offers more examples of sufficient work.

Here is a folder of student responses to assignments given in English 12:

There are three responses each to two separate assignments. They are labeled clearly.

Proof of Process: Instructional Posts [Assignment #1]

This first assignment asked students to respond to a series of instructional posts given over several weeks. This is what was posted to Google Classroom:

The three model responses in the provided folder have been reformatted and given some context within the documents themselves.

Response: “In Defense of Distraction” [Assignment #2]

The second assignment asked students to annotate two excerpts from a longer nonfiction article and then to respond in writing. This is what was posted to Google Classroom:

The instructional post contains all of the relevant links:

In Defense of Distraction

Two of the three model responses in the provided folder have been reformatted and given context within the documents themselves. The third is an image, which is reposted below:

Note that this response is unfinished, and the student worries herself if it “completely went off topic.” The teacher’s feedback on the side is included to emphasize how important it is to write enough — to do work sufficient for feedback. That threshold is easy enough to identify.

No comments

Feedback: In Shambles

  By Grade Abatement, Triage

Etymology Corner

Shambles is one of those words that sounds like its definition. We’re using the “disorder” definition, of course, not the one about the slaughterhouse — although it’s interesting to have another etymological reference to slaughterhouses, after abatement (via abate via abattoir).

Shambles might look a bit like it relates to shame, but the roots are different. The origins reference support, before changing over time to mean “ungainly” or disordered.

Shambolic, which is the adjective form, might be modeled on symbolic, and that helps, too. It’s a symbolic word, meant to conjure up the relative unsteadiness of various things, from mental states to writing.

Even the verb form, shambles, which the dictionary tells us means a “slow, shuffling, awkward gait,” works symbolically: There’s a reason zombies are described as “shambling” as often as they are.

TL;DR

You, the student enrolled in class, are subject to cause and effect. If your performance is good, good things happen; if you struggle, you will receive help until your performance improves.

This kind of cause-and-effect feedback chain is evidence-based or evidentiary. If the evidence supports an action, that’s it. That’s what we do. This is the logical construct of grade abatement, which is the logical construct of assessment in the real world: collective human judgment informed by evidence, as Tony Wagner has phrased it.

In other words, you are what you do, not who you are (or who you think you are).

Getting Help

If you complete assignments to the best of your ability, you will get positive feedback and earn higher grades. You will also be better prepared for next year, especially if you plan on attending college.

In a perfect world, that would be all the motivation you’d need. You’d forge, in that perfect world, a feedback chain of positive reinforcement and constructive criticism.

In this imperfect world, unfortunately, your motivations might differ. You might rely, for instance, on the shambolic logic of second-semester seniors, which isn’t actually confined to seniors, nor to the second semester. It’s a shambles built with bad habits.

A certain amount of contemporary research and debate calls this a generational issue, or at least a systemic one, and points to the same deficits:

  • Inability to sustain focus
  • Inability to read deeply for understanding
  • Inability to think critically or reason well
  • Inability to self-direct
  • Inability to self-assess
  • Lack of self-awareness
  • Lack of basic academic knowledge
  • Lack of basic academic skills

Students in our high school have these deficits, too — but don’t mistake this instructional post for a jeremiad (a word with its own fascinating etymology). This is an evidence-based assessment of groups of students. It is evidence-based.

And it starts, as always, with your choices. It’s what you do, not what you could do. If you don’t consistently demonstrate that you can sustain focus, then your focus is a hypothetical thing. If your work doesn’t demonstrate grade-level skills and understanding, we can’t just assume that you are capable. You’ve shown otherwise.

So it’s all about evidence. What do you do each day? What do you demonstrate through required assignments? What traits are reflected in your work? How do you advocate for yourself, for instance, in order to do your best work? Is that work sufficient?

All this evidence is organized through grade abatement profiles and a set of universal skills and traits. You could also look to Brewster’s SCP or Tony Wagner’s 21st-century skill set or probably a dozen other sources. It’s all the same. This is the stuff that persists after high school.

What you want to produce daily is evidence that you can do the following:

  • Get to class on time
  • Set a goal quickly and get to work
  • Collaborate effectively on specific goals
  • Utilize class time effectively
  • Utilize physical resources effectively
  • Utilize digital resources effectively
  • Use feedback amenably and consistently
  • Advocate for yourself early and often
  • Submit assignments on time
  • Revise assignments appropriately

Every action you take should create evidence for this list or evidence of grade-level skills (e.g., in writing). Otherwise, you need help. And if the evidence tells us you need help, then you need help.

Fortunately, this classroom, like the entire high school system, is set up to give you that help.

Possible Help, Classroom Scale

If you repeatedly demonstrate that you can’t focus in class, that you can’t do the required reading, etc, then there are a variety of interventions that could help you.

You’d first lose some autonomy and choice. You could be given an assigned seat, usually away from distractions and peers. Then you’d be given restricted access to technology — most likely a soft ban on phone use, plus heavily monitored Chromebook usage.

You might also be required to check-in at the end of each class period, not just at the beginning, in order to confirm the work you’ve done. This could be part of an individual work contract — one that would limit your choice in class in order to give you a better chance at success.

At this point, help also certainly includes phone calls home that detail the evidence of your inability to sustain focus, lack of basic skills, etc. Parents or guardians can monitor your use of time at home until you are able to demonstrate growth and mastery in class.

Possible Help, School Scale

If the evidence tells us you need more than what is possible in the classroom, we have options. It might start with a required meeting in Guidance to figure out what’s preventing you from being successful. That might lead to a meeting after school with all of your teachers to discuss how best to help you.

By involving other support systems, we have an opportunity to validate and address any social/emotional issues that are affecting your work. Depending on your needs, we could then modify assignments, set up a network of adults in the building to keep track of your progress, or get you help outside of school.

Another possibility, if you struggle with the basic skills and traits required of a senior in English, is to remove any free periods and replace them with regular study halls. The extra time in an academic environment would help you practice your focus and self-direction, and you’d have more time to finish required assignments.

Another good use of those free periods is mandated tutoring through one of the peer-driven systems in place. NHS has one; for 2019-2020, at least, we have another through the Learning Center in the iLC. Tutoring would give you regular access to a peer who could help you finish assignments, self-assess weaknesses, and so on.

All Carrot, No Stick

That last section gives you a list of interventions for students struggling with the requirements of senior English:

  • Assigned seat
  • Restricted access to technology
  • Additional daily check-in
  • Individual work contract
  • Meetings in Guidance
  • Meetings after school
  • Social/emotional support
  • Free period → mandated conferences in Room 210
  • Free period → mandated Study Hall
  • Free period → mandated tutoring in Learning Center

This is all ameliorative. It might feel like an imposition, but corrective help can feel that way — at first, before the positive impact becomes obvious. Physical therapy hurts. Emotional therapy is difficult. Sports practice can be monotonous and painful; so can play or band practice. Self-discipline takes time.

If you believe you don’t need help, but the evidence says otherwise, then you have to create different evidence. You have to prove that you don’t need help. There’s no stigma, either way. It’s evidence-based. You need help if there is evidence of the following:

  • Inability to sustain focus
  • Inability to read deeply for understanding
  • Inability to think critically or reason well
  • Inability to self-direct
  • Inability to self-assess
  • Lack of self-awareness
  • Lack of basic academic knowledge
  • Lack of basic academic skills

If you believe that this appearance is due to factors you can control, without interventions and extra help, then you must produce evidence that you can do the following:

  • Get to class on time
  • Set a goal quickly and get to work
  • Collaborate effectively on specific goals
  • Utilize class time effectively
  • Utilize physical resources effectively
  • Utilize digital resources effectively
  • Use feedback amenably and consistently
  • Advocate for yourself early and often
  • Submit assignments on time
  • Revise assignments appropriately

Ask questions about this below. You can also suggest other ways for us to help you master the necessary skills and traits of the course.

No comments

GAP Reports: Required Writing

  By Grade Abatement, Triage

There are two halves to the required self-assessment for grade abatement.

  • First, there is a form, which is outlined here and mirrors the GAP process itself.
  • Second, there is a short written response, which is explained in this post and repeated on Google Classroom.

For the writing, the best feedback can be read in this document:

An example of how the prompt is posted, from the end of Q1 in 2019:

Before we discuss the data, here is a random selection of adequate or effective responses from that Q1C example:

Emulate those in the future. Use the feedback below to help you.

Requirements

First, even though it’s obvious: You have to do the writing. It is always required. You should never turn in a GAP report without attaching a response, and the amount you write should fit the definition of sufficient in this post:

Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work

Your insights and observations are necessary for any sort of feedback. It’s how you keep the chain going.

Compliance Data

If you fail to write a thoughtful response about your progress, two things will happen:

  1. You will break that feedback chain, which slows your overall progress.
  2. You will provide last-second evidence of a lower profile.

Compliance is always an issue, of course. It’s human nature not to do the right thing, even when the choice is obvious. That doesn’t excuse lapses in judgment, but it may help you to be honest about what you need to adjust.

It may also help to see hard data about noncompliance and its effect on the learning environment. Here are some statistics from November 14, 2019, which was the date of the last GAP report of Q1:

Section 1: 29 students | 17% submitted a written response.
Section 2: 27 students | 33% submitted a written response.
Section 3: 25 students | 24% submitted a written response.
Section 4: 16 students | 19% submitted a written response.
Section 5: 19 students | 33% submitted a written response.

This does not include late work or work generated through individual conferences the next week. The key takeaway: Only 25% of all students met the deadline for a written response.

Next, we have to evaluate whether the individual responses in that 25% were adequate or effective. This kind of self-analysis must use the language of the selected profile and the language of the skills and traits. That’s not difficult to do, because all of that language fits on the front and back of a single page:

  1. Grade Abatement Profiles
  2. Universal Skills and Traits

If a student just copies over the selected profile and writes, “This is me,” it at least demonstrates an awareness that there is required language. It’s a lapse in close reading and critical thinking to make up what you think constitutes a particular grade.

Overall, 41% of the completed assignments were adequate or effective. That means only 10% of the total student roster handed in adequate work by the deadline. This is much lower than normal, and it doesn’t include late work. That’s why I’m using the example: All that late and insufficient work slowed down the feedback process and prevented us from using the makerspace’s flexibility to make adjustments. It gummed up the works.

If you take the time to write when asked, you improve your score, help your progress, and prevent damage to the class.

Ask any questions about these reports below.