Learning to Lie

Note: The header image for this post (the image you see in emails or when the post is embedded elsewhere) comes from an essay published by an AP student in 2015 in response to Bronson’s article.


Learning to Lie


This is the central hub for reading and responding to “Learning to Lie,” a 2008 essay by Po Bronson. First up is the essay in its original state:

http://nymag.com/news/features/43893/

Then we have the copy formatted for annotation in class:

That copy will also be attached to any Google Classroom assignments, including the essay prompt that always follows our discussion of Bronson’s piece:

That prompt utilizes the writing process in full. A PDF copy of the essay prompt is embedded before the comment section, which is where you should add your insights, observations, and questions.

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2FEssay-Prompt_-Learning-to-Lie.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

Cuckoo’s Nest: Weekly Assignments


One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest


March 18, 2019: Read on for updates to our study of the novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, in English 11 ICT.

Overview of the Novel: Parts 1-4
  • Part 1 — Pages 3-145
  • Part 2 — Pages 149-201
  • Part 3 — Pages 205-258
  • Part 4 — Pages 261-325
Reading Assignments
  • Due Tuesday, March 19 — Pages 3-41
  • Due Friday, March 22 — Pages 42-75
  • Due Friday, March 29 — Pages 76-158
  • Due Friday, April 5 — Pages 159-258
  • Due Friday, April 12 — Pages 261-325
Writing Assignments
  • Due Monday, March 25 — Response to Pages 3-75
  • Due Monday, April 1 — Response to Pages 76-158
  • Due Monday, April 8 — Response to Pages 159-258
  • Due Monday, April 22 — Response to Pages 261-325

Note that the final writing assignment is due after Spring Break.

On each Friday, when a reading assignment is due, you will write an in-class response based on the assigned reading. You will then type that response over the weekend and submit both the handwritten and typed writing by the beginning of class on Monday. Work handed in after the beginning of class will be considered late, and all insufficient or incomplete work will factor heavily into your GAP scores.

Mondays will still be reserved for sustained, silent reading.


A Thorough Explanation of These Changes


Copies of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest were distributed before the February break. For the next few weeks, we balanced essay-writing assignments with essential questions related to the novel. Finally, you were given a daily calendar for the rest of the year and a streamlined process for choosing between the assigned novel and a work of equivalent literary merit.

This was a massive amount of preparation and planning. It was meant to give you choice and freedom. Consider the updated makerspace FAQ or this recently published overview of a makerspace: It takes much more work on your teacher’s end to give you choices, because we are essentially creating 32 separate lessons for 32 individuals.

Consider, too, the transparent attempt this year to focus first on skills, and then to build from shorter nonfiction and fiction to several canonical novels. This gave you time to build stamina and develop good habits, and it opened up the possibility of choosing to read over being forced to read.

We even showed you extraordinary empathy and patience by studying, through close reading and discussion, the nature of your struggle with akrasia and self-control. That was back in October, and we’ve returned to your need for self-regulation and self-discipline over and over again.

As a class, you’ve recently failed to demonstrate self-control. You’ve failed to follow directions and take advantage of the opportunities given to you. As a result:

  • Your freedom to choose what to read is revoked.
  • The choice-related assignment that was originally due on Wednesday is now null and void.
  • You now have assigned seats and group members.
  • You will not be given Fridays to work on your 20% projects.

You should work on your Pareto Projects on your own time, carving out 20% of your schedule elsewhere. You are still responsible for the project itself.

Instead of your projects, you will now spend every Friday writing an in-class response on the assigned pages from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. You will then type that response over the weekend and submit both the handwritten and typed writing by the beginning of class on Monday. Mondays will still be reserved for sustained, silent reading.

You will still do the reading and writing assignments outlined for Tuesdays and Thursdays. The next two are a narrative response based on an essay, “Learning to Lie,” and a character analysis response based on One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. You will still do silent, individual Regents Exam prep every Wednesday. The only difference will be your assigned seats and groups.

We will update the daily calendar in the next few days to reflect these changes. We will note reading assignments there, too. You may ask questions in the comment section below.

Video Meliora: Phone Ban

Starting Monday, your phones will be banned in the classroom. You’ve been given one of the pockets in the corner of our room as a holder for that phone:

Notes on the surrounding posters and handouts are in the next section. First, a complete list of assigned pocket numbers:

Write down your number. They are assigned in alphabetical order. We may also use these numbers to do some assigned group work.

Part of what you’re doing is performative — you are showing us, at the start of class, that you’ve chosen to remove the distraction of the phone. Putting that phone in its designated pocket does that. You are basically channeling Oedipus in this scene and playing to the back of the theater.

You should turn off notifications, sound, etc., before storing the phone. Make it obvious that you are removing the distraction.


The Why


You’ll notice posters and handouts all around the storage cubby for your phones. These are reminders about how to start the class period so that you can be most effective. The bigger poster is drawn from this:

“What Do I Do Next?”

While the smaller posters are all gleaned from the following document, which will be added to the “What Do I Do Next?” post when I find an extra hour in the day.

This is all about self-control and removing distraction. Remember that we banned phones once before:

Moratorium

That was the trial run. Keep in mind, too, that we looked at self-control and distraction earlier in the year:

The Return of the Fatal Flying Guillotine

That’s where the black-and-yellow poster by the phone cubby originates, at least in this class: Video meliora proboque, deteriora sequor. It means, “I see better things, and approve, but I follow worse.” I think you’ll find your productivity increases greatly without that distraction.

Ask questions about any of this, from the protocol for putting away your phones to the philosophy behind the decision, in the comment section below.

A Matter of Character

Every year at this time — early March, with just enough winter left to make the rest of the year feel interminable — the high school’s National Honor Society chapter invites students to join. The first invitations are based on the student’s cumulative GPA1; the application, however, stresses a wide range of skill, straits, and knowledge.

The most interesting requirement might be character, which gets its first definition in the NHS guide to becoming a member:

The student of good character is cooperative; demonstrates high standards of honesty and reliability; shows courtesy, concern, and respect for others; and generally maintains a clean disciplinary record.

Searching their website for a bit will lead you to a more thorough definition, which is well worth reading in full.  In that address, the president of Trinity Washington University in Washington, D.C., states that

[c]olleges and universities seek students who demonstrate high moral character. University leaders desire students who will contribute richly to a campus community, not only through scholarship, leadership, service, and citizenship, but with a mutually inclusive commitment to trust, honor, and respect.

She ends by telling her audience — students preparing to apply to and attend college — to “remember the influence your character has on your opportunities, relationships, and future contributions to society.”

The National Honor Society doesn’t have a monopoly on character, of course. Character matters to every student preparing to apply to and attend college, which is why it’s one of the essential skills and traits in Brewster’s SCP and our makerspace’s grade abatement profiles:

This “ongoing, underlying focus on the individual learning experience” is dependent on a student’s character. Individualizing learning2 requires a strong sense of who that individual is.

Which is why you see articles like this one, from Bucknell Magazine, stressing character, not GPAs and SATs, as critical to “an open and holistic process of recognizing talent.” Read the entire piece below:

In the end, this is not about the National Honor Society at all. It’s a larger conversation around character and its role in school cultures, from high school to college. The March emergence of NHS simply gives us the occasion to discuss and to write about character.

It’s worth noting, as we move on, that while NHS is a net positive in school, it does succumb to some weird logic. Click for the xkcd site, or go here for an explanation of the comic.


Defining Character


To write about character requires a definition of character, even before we launch the writing process. This definition will change through discussion and reflection, but we need a starting point. I’d suggest the comic strip Calvin and Hobbes, which often addressed “building character” through Calvin’s interactions with his dad.

After reading a set of such strips, you should see the way a child’s perception of “character” conflicts with an older generation’s definition. It’s an interesting starting point, and it lets us return to the academic definition with a clearer perspective.

Start with what Patricia McGuire, president of Trinity Washington University, gave as her definition of character:

  1. a concern for and personal commitment to a community

  2. an individual’s integrity, honesty, and trust

  3. an unwavering pledge to abide by established policies and regulations

  4. a willingness to stand and be an advocate for those who are experiencing adversity

  5. a demonstrated commitment to fairness and social justice

  6. a respect for the rights, needs, reputation, and intellectual and physical property of others

Each term and phrase in that list can be unpacked, discussed, etc., to draw us closer to our own definition. We can then compare that to the criteria given by the National Honor Society itself. NHS indicates that a student of character:

  1. takes criticism willingly and accepts recommendations graciously;

  2. consistently exemplifies desirable qualities of behavior (cheerfulness, friendliness, poise, stability);

  3. upholds principles of morality and ethics;

  4. cooperates by complying with school regulations concerning property, programs, office, halls, etc.;

  5. demonstrates the highest standards of honesty and reliability;

  6. shows courtesy, concern, and respect for others; observes instructions and rules;

  7. exhibits concentration and sustained attention as shown by perseverance and application to studies;

  8. manifests truthfulness in acknowledging obedience to rules, avoiding cheating in written work, and showing unwillingness to profit by the mistakes of others;

  9. actively helps rid the school of bad influences or environment.

These are interesting criteria to analyze. Pay attention to adverbs and adjectives, to abstract ideas like “morality and ethics,” and to the significant overlap between these criteria and our set of universal skills and traits3.


Writing a Character Essay


If you’ve invested in this interstitial post so far, you’ve already done a fair bit of the first part of our writing process:

The Writing Process

Now we can tie your background reading, critical thinking, and definitional work into a formal prompt:

Write an essay about your character.

Use the writing process to do this. Here is a direct link to the printed document:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2FWriting-Process-v4-1.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

Start with the prompt, which is a deceptively simple one. You’ll need to think about your audience, your purpose, the sorts of clichés that abound in the more rote character essays — and then it’s a matter of finding an approach that explores your character in a unique and authentic way.

This sort of essay can be explicitly about selling yourself, including language that specifically references an application process (“I would be a good fit for these reasons”), but the best responses will do this more subtly, often by letting the storytelling guide the reader. Showing, not telling, will be our goal.

It is all embedded in the writing process itself. Use the digital or printed version, and remember that the makerspace is built for this kind of exercise. You are solving an authentic problem: how to write a character essay about yourself in a world that increasingly demands that you demonstrate great character.

Use the comment section to ask questions about the process, or to comment on some of this background reading and definitional work. We will do the bulk of our writing work in class, together, and probably without screens. This is an opportunity to prep at home and embrace the physicality of writing in school.

Keep something in mind: This is the first year that juniors will write their college essay at the end of the year, instead of writing it at the start of their senior year. Our character essay is a precursor to that, and many of your responses will be useful to us in May and June. This prompt does not, however, carry with it any restrictions on word count, subject matter, and style.

Let’s find the river.


  1. As always, I would point interested stakeholders toward Alfie Kohn and Jerry Jesness for a crash course in why GPA might not be the best starting point, even if it is the most straightforward way to sort students. 

  2. And it may always haunt me, like Marley haunting Scrooge, that “individualizing” is erroneously capitalized in this printed/posted/publicized version of our universal skills and traits. 

  3. Note, for instance, that “tak[ing] criticism willingly” is amenability. Collegiality and empathy are shown through “courtesy, concern, and respect for others.” This is universal stuff, and that should help us in writing. 

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest

This is the instructional hub for a study of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.


Essential Questions


First, students will work in small groups to write answers to a set of essential questions adapted from the year-long questions suggested by the syllabus. These questions inform the literature and nonfiction we study.

  1. To what extent should we trust that what we see is what is really happening?
  2. To what extent should we trust our memories of the past?
  3. Is it better to be ignorant and happy, or to gain knowledge, even at the cost of happiness? Why?
  4. To what extent and in what ways does power corrupt?
  5. What does it look like to be truly alone, and what is the impact of loneliness on us?
  6. To what extent is human nature self-destructive?
  7. How should we deal with individuals who threaten a community?

Remember that you have precise feedback about how to answer essential questions thoroughly in this post: Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work.

We start with handwritten responses. After small-group discussions, those responses can be typed up and submitted for feedback.


Holt’s Threshold


Students will be given class time to read the novel and find what we call “Holt’s threshold.” We can then discuss whether to continue to read One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest or to select a work of equivalent literary merit. Here are the two relevant instructional posts:

The Reading Process

Choosing to Read [2018]


Non-Fiction


We will also study this nonfiction piece, written on the 50th anniversary of the novel:

Ken Kesey’s Wars: “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” at 50

Ever since it was published 50 years ago critics have described Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest as the great nonconformist novel, but Nathaniel Rich writes that the novel’s true message is about the militarization of American society-and the trauma of war.

This is literary analysis and argument from Nathaniel Rich, who writes often about literature. The first paragraph:

When a novel becomes a “classic”—when it is digested by critics and English teachers and study guide authors into bite-size morsels that can be slurped with a spoon—it undergoes a peculiar type of transformation. For one, it ceases to resemble a novel. Even the messiest, most obstreperous books are reduced to a litany of bullet points, or a single bullet point. Moby Dick: Obsession devours. Crime and Punishment: Guilt corrupts. White Noise: Technology numbs. It can be disorienting to actually read the damn thing, and find out the epitaph is no more descriptive than a chapter title, and a misleading one at that.

This fits our approach to reading. For a refresher, look back at the reading process posts, or read this:

Well, Why Read?

Data, Data Everywhere [English 11, 2/25/19]

Schedule time before March 1 to read this post and apply its data and feedback to yourself. Think of it in terms of interstitial awareness: When and how will you be able to read this most carefully?

Ask any general questions in the comment section at the end of the post.


GAP Q3A Scores


It is critical that you first read this post on pre-GAP triage:

GAP Score Triage: Overview

Then you must find your set of GAP Q3A data in the following spreadsheet:

You can also use type the URL directly: https://tinyurl.com/gap-triage-218. Scores for Q3A will be posted in the morning on February 25.


New Hall Passes


On Friday, February 15, one of the bathroom passes for Room 210 was found on the floor of the cafeteria, which is, as you may have noticed, not the bathroom. We’d already lost a pass or two this year to that sort of abuse, so you’ll now be signing out and back in every time you leave the room.

If you take too long, go too often, wander down to the cafeteria, or in any other way abuse the privilege, you lose that privilege.


No More Phones


December saw the first moratorium on phones:

Moratorium

Phones can be learning tools, though, or so the thinking goes. In January, we went back to student choice and self-control (again), and you were allowed to use phones and other personal devices in the makerspace.

Starting February 26 — on Tuesday, so you have Monday to make peace with the change — you’ll be prohibited from using your phones in the makerspace. The negative impact on your learning far outweighs the benefits.

You might want to read this to understand why the ban is necessary:

I will sort out individual access as necessary. Anticipate putting your phone in the holder in the corner, or accept that one of your teachers will take the phone to administration.


Spreadsheet Specifics


You should read the triage post and look over the spreadsheet first.

Total Check-In %

These numbers are based on the maximum possible “Daily Check-In” responses from November 17 through February 14. Absences and individual circumstances were taken into account after the fact on a case-by-case basis.

These percentages also ignore the content of those responses; instead, we are using them as reference points for habit-building and compliance. They are part of a bigger picture, like everything else.

Learning By Doing

This will get its own lesson, post, and discussion at some point.

The basic idea is that the more you, the student, do on your end, the more you learn. The work teaches you without the need for constant correction and redirection. When the assignments, texts, questions, etc., are done sincerely and thoughtfully, the doing is often enough. Hence the 0/1/2 scale on a triage spreadsheet like this.

That scale is there to tell you, after the fact and in conjunction with a GAP score, “No, you didn’t do enough.” Find the folks who wrote a lot for the ETA podcast assignment, for instance. Their work taught them through the way they did it. Others would be recorded as a “2” mostly out of kindness, but they definitely didn’t learn a lot from the writing — it’s a couple of sentences, if that, and obviously not enough to construct real meaning.

You get out of this what you put in. That’s the key to learning. You are given lessons that teach you by making you the agent of change. It’s not just about being corrected and redirected and so on. You explore and think in writing, and while helpful correction always comes in person, in class, in face-to-face meetings, etc., the habits and understandings that last longest happen through the work itself.

It’s a better form of feedback. When you don’t complete the assignment sincerely and thoughtfully, it doesn’t work. For you. It’s on you, then, to put in your best effort each time.


Update: Reading Calendar [Assignment Notes]


This assignment is on the post-panel proof-of-process pre-GAP spreadsheet as “Update: Reading Calendar.” It required only a single click. You had to indicate that you read the update by marking the assignment as done. Look at the directions in Google Classroom: “Let us know that you read the post.”

That’s it. Click a button. Let us know. Look at the spreadsheet, and note how many folks didn’t do that. Whether it was an oversight, an indication that they didn’t read the update, or disengagement, the takeaway is the same: You have to get better at organization. You might want to revisit that unit from the beginning of the year:

Organization: Getting Things Done


Essay Writing: Five Prompts (Process) [Assignment Notes]


Go back to Google Classroom and read the directions for this assignment. Here is the second-to-last paragraph:

It’s also a test, again, of your ability to read directions carefully: You should attach evidence of your writing process here, but that evidence will vary from person to person. Anything from brainstorming to reflections on the process to a final essay would be evidence. You’ll need to work with your teachers in class to figure out what works for you.

You had to attach something here. Something. “Anything from brainstorming to reflections on the process to a final essay would be evidence.”

Here from one of your peers is an actual essay that works as evidence: https://tinyurl.com/y4mx634q.

Here is an essay that came from an individualized prompt: https://tinyurl.com/y3rqpkcg. That works, too.

The point is that the directions tell you what to do. They aren’t open for interpretation. You can’t replace them with your own assignment unless you have explicitly and individually been told otherwise.


Essay Writing: What’s In Your Name? [Assignment Notes]


Go back to Google Classroom and read the directions for this assignment. You’ll be told to read the instructional post, and when you do, you find this:

The prompt for this writing assignment is simple: Write an essay about your name. The trick is unpacking that prompt and finding an interesting approach to the subject.

That was posted January 31. We talked a lot in class about this essay as an alternative to the “five prompts” essay, so you might not have finished it. That would be fine, but finishing is obviously different from starting. You had to do something over the three weeks this was an assignment, and it needed, to some extent, to reflect your understanding of the writing process:

The Writing Process

In other words, if you don’t have anything here, and you don’t have anything submitted for the “five prompts” essay, what did you write? Where is the evidence of three or four weeks of makerspace work?

For the most part, if you did anything here, it “counts” for the post-panel proof-of-process pre-GAP spreadsheet.


Regents Students: Overall Feedback on Q3A


https://tinyurl.com/gap-anchors | Load that document. Review at the descriptions on pages two and three. When you’re done, look at your assignments on Google Classroom for Q3A.

Here is a comment that could have been applied to many students:

Read both the student’s thoughts and my response. Then read a similar exchange with a different student:

Both students feel that directions, deadlines, and expectations are unclear. That feeling is important, because we need to work together to alleviate it. It is not a feeling based on fact, however.

There absolutely are deadlines. They are clear and consistent deadlines. Here is a student from the same Regents class as the previous two:

 

Note the time stamps for my responses. My feedback for these three students was within the same ten-minute window on Saturday, February 16. Here is another student in the same class, less than ten minutes later:

This student is using the idea of “External Artifacts” to take responsibility for missing work, because they know how clear and consistent the expectations have been. Rather than make excuses, they’ve embraced the empathy and flexibility at the heart of the course.

It’s also important to note that you have several days to write a paragraph like that about some element of your grade abatement profile. Here is what is possible in just 25 minutes of focused writing:

Again, read the student’s response and my feedback. This is a student is “focused and productive,” despite “a very large class with the potential to distract”; since every Regents class in the space this year is large, that could be said for all focused and productive students.

This student’s response is also honest. That’s why we focus so much on the Dunning-Kruger effect and the fear of being honest that holds students back. That last student has the following row in the post-panel proof-of-process pre-GAP spreadsheet:

That is exactly what they describe in their paragraph. That’s why they are a 90 in Infinite Campus: self-awareness, amenability, integrity, and overall consistency.


GAP Q3A Starts the Ending


With all that in mind, you have to start thinking in Regents English about getting credit for the year, passing the exam (final or Regents), etc., because some of you are closing in on the point of no return.

We’re going to try to slow down. You’re still going to have to make good choices, pay attention to directions, etc., but we’re going to go as slowly as we possibly can. You must

  1. follow all directions exactly;
  2. meet all deadlines, unless explicitly told otherwise;
  3. use all individual and general feedback to improve; and
  4. stay focused each and every day in class.

If you don’t know what to do after reading this post, start with a review of what it means to do enough work to get credit:

Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work

Ask general questions in the comment section below.

Galvanizing Feedback: How to Sisyphean High

“Sisyphean High” is an example of anthimeria in the title of this post, because we’re talking about a different sort of action. As always, the most important thing we learn is always something about how we learn, and the makerspace exists to build a better version of each student.

To Sisyphean High, so to speak, is to study how we learn the way we’d study computing in order to build our own PC. It’s highly modular learning — that is, learning with a focus on understanding and then experimenting with each component1.

It is also best done collaboratively, hence:

In It Together: 2/14/19 Discussion

That activity and the subsequent discussion need to be codified somehow, or we’ll lose the insight students gleaned from this year’s feedback after analyzing it in class2. For instance, that instructional post, “In It Together,” asks us to sort the responses into positive and negative piles, but students had a better idea almost immediately:

  1. A pile of responses that could be used to help others
  2. A pile of responses from students who seem to need help

That’s a great example of the best kind of feedback. And after we’ve done that — sorted the responses according to a different sort of efficacy and need — we can start getting down some of your insights.

Students: Use the comment section of this post to share ideas. Focus on how to galvanize peers and improve the learning environment. Reflect on the patterns you saw and the specific details that resonated. Above all else, be empathetic.

We’ll talk in class about how to use our universalized writing process to respond to this activity, too, according to your interest and investment. An open letter, a narrative, a how-to guide — these are all possible writing responses that could be published and publicized in order to help others.


  1. If PC building isn’t your thing, I really do think this essay that uses cooking as the analogy is a helpful one. 

  2. It’s important to link back to last year’s feedback, too, as part of this exercise. The insights are the same, although the data pool is shallower. 

In It Together: 2/14/19 Discussion

Note: This post is from 2019, but it may help other students and stakeholders to understand the efficacy of the course. The lesson outlined and explicated here was designed to showcase positive feedback from students, both to defend the space from its detractors and to encourage buy-in from students and other stakeholders.

On to the original post:

Scroll past the background to the first subheading (“Rising Tides”) to see the details of the lesson itself. We will be setting up on February 13, weather permitting, and sharing out our findings on February 14. And if you missed this on the main page of the site, here’s an essay about taking risks and getting engaged in our makerspace:

View at Medium.com

In brief, the lesson we’re running this week is about collecting and sharing feedback in order to increase student buy-in and agency. The makerspace embeds Brewster’s SCP and other “future-ready” methods, and specific student feedback, positive or negative, helps us improve that work.

That’s one of our makerspace walls, with notes on the Daily Check-In and its mindfulness component; the use of engineering “failsafes” to insure a common language; the connection between our work and Brewster’s SCP; and in the corner, a note on adaptability in the face of inevitable curricular dissonance.

Just like it is in our writing process, adaptability here is about a universal language that students can take with them1.

Consider what Gerald Graff and Steve Benton published about this in 2013:

[C]urricular dissonance also does much to widen the achievement gap. The high achievers manage to synthesize the mixed messages on their own and thereby deepen their learning from course to course, but the rest do not. For them, education is not a cumulative process, but a bizarre obstacle course in which students must virtually start from scratch every time they enter a new course. Who can blame them if they come away believing that education is just a cynical business of learning enough to get past one teacher and then setting aside those lessons to meet the unrelated or conflicting demands of the next one?

This matches what you see in a high school. Students move from class to class and year to year without a guarantee that things will stay the same. That “bizarre obstacle course” persists, even when progressive systems like Brewster develop ways to bring teachers together — and Brewster’s Strategic Coherence Plan really does give students universal languages for assessing their own learning.

The high achievers’ ability to navigate this is the key. That ability can be learned, and all students need to know how to “synthesize the mixed messages on their own and thereby deepen their learning,” as Graff and Benton put it. We need to teach deeper skills and develop persistent traits in students.

With that in mind, here are the prompts and instructions that were posted on January 28, with a soft deadline of February 4:

Engines That Could

The prompts are carried over from the 2018 version of this survey. They are, in order:

  1. Reflect on our use of makerspace ideas and strategies — project-based learning, process-focused feedback, collaboration, etc — to promote student-centered work.
  2. Reflect on the extent to which the interstitial classroom’s flipped, multi-level instruction has changed how you access lessons and other important information.
  3. Reflect on the ways grade abatement’s use of profiles, skills, and traits has impacted your self-awareness, self-efficacy, and overall sense of success. Use this post as necessary: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2139.
  4. Reflect on how you use technology (e.g., smartphones, Chromebooks) in the makerspace to individualize and organize your learning.
  5. Reflect on our approach to writing, especially the focus on process over product and the use of radial and proxy feedback to empower and encourage students.
  6. Reflect on our approach to reading, especially the use of student choice in literature through the process outlined here: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2106.
  7. Reflect on the extent to which the course and classroom have impacted your social and emotional well-being, especially the use of a mindfulness-inspired daily check-in (http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2539).
  8. Reflect on our focus on empathy and collegiality as the “stuff of growth,” including the extent to which your work with others has helped you to accomplish your learning goals.
  9. Reflect on the big questions we consider as a Humanities makerspace — the problems we solve, individually and collectively, through creative and critical thinking.
  10. Reflect on the extent to which this course invites you to take risks, overcome obstacles, and forge connections between hard work and success.
  11. Reflect on the extent to which you are given clear goals and actionable feedback that help you adapt to academic and social/emotional challenges. See the posts on feedback as necessary: https://medium.com/@sisypheanhigh/a-better-form-of-feedback-b340032e3dd0
  12. Reflect on how this course instills in you the skills, traits, and attributes you believe are necessary for college and a 21st-century career.
  13. Reflect on the extent to which our universal skills and traits have helped you in other academic disciplines and assignments.
  14. Reflect on how this course is explicitly and implicitly preparing you for any and all high-stakes tests, including explicit test prep. Consider, too, our approach to quizzes: http://sisypheanhigh.com/malachite/?p=2562

There is also a space on the form for additional reflections that don’t quite fit one of the other prompts.


Rising Tides


To set up student work on these responses, my co-teachers and I needed to

  1. take the unedited feedback from students and transfer it to a spreadsheet;
  2. post that spreadsheet: https://tinyurl.com/SSCP-19;
  3. print the responses and add some of the feedback from last year’s students;
  4. cut out each individual response; and then
  5. bag the responses by prompt.

Each class period gets a stack or two on one of the tables in the makerspace. Then, in groups, they sort the responses, putting positive feedback in one stack and negative feedback in another.

Remember, this is unedited feedback, except where we had to remove identifying details. That’s the point. Students will see overwhelmingly more positive feedback, and that positive feedback tends to be specific and clear. The focus on metacognition and self-efficacy creates that kind of clarity.

And what that does is to open up a discussion about why students are not successful, or at least about what those students report about their lack of success. No one is singled out or otherwise embarrassed, even through an individual conference, because our focus is on helping everyone improve their learning.

As the responses are sorted, each group talks about what they observe, with the ultimate goal of reporting out those findings in a discussion over the next period or two. Each group will also share ideas on how to move the less successful students into the much larger group of motivated, successful students.

We’ll repeat the lesson in each class, from 10th grade to AP, and then provide everyone a chance to codify their findings through website comments, posters in the classroom, and open letters to struggling students.

This is empathy-driven problem-solving, done anonymously so that struggling students in the room can listen and incorporate the feedback at their own comfort level. It’s also a reminder of how powerful the profiles we use can be. The GAP process covers this, of course, but we’ll also be using the first page of a handout on GAP anchors:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FGAP-Anchors-WIP.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

The fourth tier of profiles center around a GAP score of 8, which becomes a 95 — by any metric, then, a measure of outstanding work. And the key in a makerspace to that performance is improving the learning environment for others. The strongest students benefit as much as anyone from the protégé effect, especially because of what that hyperlinked article ends with:

Above all, it’s the emotions elicited by teaching that make it such a powerful vehicle for learning. Student tutors feel chagrin when their virtual pupils fail; when the characters succeed, they feel what one expert calls by the Yiddish term nachas. Don’t know that word? I had to learn it myself: “Pride and satisfaction that is derived from someone else’s accomplishment.”

Unmotivated or disengaged students are given a way to reenter the learning environment, not out of fear or through force, but because the path is clear, and high-achieving students are shown a path to even greater success.

And that brings us back to how we started the year.

The Stuff of Growth

The first thing we do in the makerspace is watch the animated version of Ken Robinson’s speech on educational paradigms:

The complete poster of this RSA Animate hangs on our wall, too. And while it’s all inspiring, the key is what he says toward the end:

Great learning happens in groups. Collaboration is the stuff of growth.

As high schools move toward teaching students how to learn, not just teaching content, this collaborative “stuff” will be the most important element. Students will need empathy and a sense of the greater good to teach each other.

Herd Immunity

The other side of Robinson’s coin is that we need students who are inoculated against misinformation, cynicism, and self-doubt. That takes herd immunity:

View at Medium.com

This makerspace is emblematic of the need to arm students with information, open-mindedness, and patience. I can address rumor-mongering directly, and I can clarify what we do repeatedly; it’s only through the testimonials of students, however, that the paradigm shift begins to find roots. If we want buy-in for any major change in education, it has to be sold on the words of students.

That’s the point of a lesson like this: For all the lengthy, hyperlinked instruction delivered through this a website, the real impact will be in class using the oldest tools we have. We’ll have paper, pens, and voices. We’ll have each other.

As always, the comment section below is for questions.


  1. The next few paragraphs are lifted verbatim from that post on the writing process. This is really the focus of a Humanities makerspace, and I am getting used to the language as much as the idea. We are building substructural strength. As Neil Postman wrote, the most important thing students learn is always something about how they learn. 

Essay Writing: Five Prompts

This assignment builds on the NPR Podcast Challenge we started in early January:

NPR Student Podcast Challenge

You can continue to use the space to complete the challenge, and I’ll make that an ongoing option through the end of March. There is an opportunity here to do more than just a podcast, though. The five prompts provided by NPR could be used for discussion and essay-writing, too.

First, those prompts again:

Tell us a story about your school or community: about something that happened there — recently or in the past — that your audience should know about.

What is a moment in history that all students should learn about?

Show us both sides of a debate about an issue that’s important to you.

What do you want to change about the world? What’s a big change that students today will make in the future?

Explain something to us that kids understand and grown-ups don’t.

Answering these five questions has given you the subject and approach, at least, for five different essays. We will use the writing process(es) outlined here:

The Writing Process

Your assignment is simple: Choose a prompt, and then write an essay in response to it.

You can use your peers for inspiration, by the way, since you can load the Google Form you completed, click on “See previous responses,” and read hundreds of potential approaches:

You have to add your own answers first, of course. If you’ve done that, you now have access to the anonymous suggestions of your peers.

Follow any further directions on Google Classroom, and ask questions below.

What’s In Your Name?

Earlier this month, you were invited to read excerpts from Freakonomics:

What’s In a Name?

The focus overall is on parenting, with the subject of names dominating an entire chapter. That is now our focus: the names we have and what we might write about them.


Prompt and Circumstance


The prompt for this writing assignment is simple: Write an essay about your name. The trick is unpacking that prompt and finding an interesting approach to the subject.

To do this, we’ll us two tactics. First, a work-in-progress guide to writing built on makerspace principles. It’s roughly 90% complete, which means it will work for you:

It will also be shared in class. Following those steps will produce an essay.

The second tactic is to use the comment section of this post to share, discuss, critique, etc., your ideas. Focus on your approach. What is the interesting perspective you can bring to bear on the subject of your name? What questions can you ask and answer? What will interest a potential audience? And so on.

Post your (succinct) comments here, and we’ll let the interstitial mechanisms of the course take over. Follow Google Classroom for deadlines and other requirements.