Search Results for: pareto project

40 Days: English 10 Regents

April 22 is the beginning of the fourth and last quarter of the year. 40 days remain. Let’s start with a review of the basic resources available to students and all stakeholders:

If you are a parent or guardian and haven’t already done so, bookmark the course website and sign up for Google Classroom email summaries.


Course Specifics: English 10


We’ll start with Macbeth, which we’ll read and watch in class:

Reading Macbeth

We’ll then write a reader’s response to Macbeth, using the following writing process:

Writing Process: Reader’s Response

For the last novel of the year, students will be given a choice. We’ll work our way toward another reader-response essay, in addition to the usual approach to literary analysis and discussion.

We’ll also study persuasive writing, a mode of discourse that lets us learn about research, synthesis, and citation. Students will write a persuasive essay in May.

Pareto Projects, also known as 20-Time or 20% Projects, will be presented in June. For a recap of what that entails:

The final exam will be taken in class during the week of June 10. It will be based on the essay-writing portion of the New York State Regents Examination in English Language Arts.

Ask any questions about our scheduled work below, and pay careful attention to any changes announced through Google Classroom. As always, assignments will be formally posted there; this site will be used for instruction, general feedback, and planning purposes; and individual feedback will be given interstitially through our usual methods.

The Invisible Man: Required Final Assignments


The Invisible Man


March 19, 2019 Update:

You will be reading the rest of the novel, The Invisible Man, with three days in class to hit specific page goals. You will not be able to choose another book in place of The Invisible Man.

We will then watch the 1933 film version of The Invisible Man. It will take two days. See the course calendar for the planned dates.

Finally, you will write a character analysis essay comparing the film to the novel. The majority of this will be completed in class. Again, see the course calendar for the planned dates.

Direct Link to the Novel Online
Reading Assignments

Page numbers are taken from the Dover Thrift Edition available in the classroom. Use the direct link above if reading online.

  • Due Friday, March 22 — Chapters 13-17 (Pages 43-59)
  • Due Monday, March 25 — Chapters 18-21 (Pages 60-77)
  • Due Tuesday, March 26 — Chapters 22-26 (Pages 78-97)
  • Due Friday, March 29 — Chapter 27-Epilogue (Pages 98-110)
Writing Assignments
  • Due Thursday, April 4 — Character analysis essay

 


An Explanation of These Changes


We started The Invisible Man on February 7. For the next few weeks, we tackled essential questions, in-class discussion, and the next round of 20% projects. Most recently, we did close reading of later chapters in The Invisible Man to practice analytical writing.

Here is what that looks like in Google Classroom:

You were also given a daily calendar for the rest of the year and a streamlined process for choosing between the assigned novel and a work of equivalent literary merit.

This degree of preparation and planning was meant to give you choice. Consider the updated makerspace FAQ or this recently published overview of a makerspace: It takes much more work on our end to give you choices, because we are setting up individual feedback and flexibility.

Consider, too, the transparent attempt this year to focus first on skills while promoting choice in what we read. We gave you time to build stamina and develop good habits, which helped us, after A Long Way Gone, to choose to read instead of being forced to read.

We even showed you empathy and patience by studying, through close reading and discussion, the nature of your struggle with focus and self-control. That was back in October, and we’ve returned to your need for self-regulation and self-discipline repeatedly, most recently by banning phones to increase productivity.

Unfortunately, you have struggled collectively to stay focused. You aren’t meeting deadlines, and the lack of reading means your “choosing to read” analysis is ineffective.

To help you, we are having everyone read The Invisible Man. We may return to choice novels in Q4, but this novel and Macbeth will be mandated. We are also making these changes:

  • You now have assigned seats and group members.
  • You will not be given Fridays to work on your 20% projects until April 12.

You will need to work on your Pareto Projects on your own time, carving out 20% of your schedule elsewhere. You are still responsible for the project itself. On April 12, before Spring Break, we’ll dedicate the period to these projects again, with the hope of using every Friday after that to plan and create.

Instead of your projects, you’ll be using the next three Fridays to catch up on the required reading and writing. You can see in the daily calendar what this specifically entails.

You will first finish the SOAPSTONE analysis assigned for this week:

SOAPSTONE: “The Siege of Kemp’s House”

We will update the daily calendar to reflect these changes. We will note page counts and other specifics, too. Ask questions in the comment section below.

Cuckoo’s Nest: Weekly Assignments


One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest


March 18, 2019: Read on for updates to our study of the novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, in English 11 ICT.

Overview of the Novel: Parts 1-4
  • Part 1 — Pages 3-145
  • Part 2 — Pages 149-201
  • Part 3 — Pages 205-258
  • Part 4 — Pages 261-325
Reading Assignments
  • Due Tuesday, March 19 — Pages 3-41
  • Due Friday, March 22 — Pages 42-75
  • Due Friday, March 29 — Pages 76-158
  • Due Friday, April 5 — Pages 159-258
  • Due Friday, April 12 — Pages 261-325
Writing Assignments
  • Due Monday, March 25 — Response to Pages 3-75
  • Due Monday, April 1 — Response to Pages 76-158
  • Due Monday, April 8 — Response to Pages 159-258
  • Due Monday, April 22 — Response to Pages 261-325

Note that the final writing assignment is due after Spring Break.

On each Friday, when a reading assignment is due, you will write an in-class response based on the assigned reading. You will then type that response over the weekend and submit both the handwritten and typed writing by the beginning of class on Monday. Work handed in after the beginning of class will be considered late, and all insufficient or incomplete work will factor heavily into your GAP scores.

Mondays will still be reserved for sustained, silent reading.


A Thorough Explanation of These Changes


Copies of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest were distributed before the February break. For the next few weeks, we balanced essay-writing assignments with essential questions related to the novel. Finally, you were given a daily calendar for the rest of the year and a streamlined process for choosing between the assigned novel and a work of equivalent literary merit.

This was a massive amount of preparation and planning. It was meant to give you choice and freedom. Consider the updated makerspace FAQ or this recently published overview of a makerspace: It takes much more work on your teacher’s end to give you choices, because we are essentially creating 32 separate lessons for 32 individuals.

Consider, too, the transparent attempt this year to focus first on skills, and then to build from shorter nonfiction and fiction to several canonical novels. This gave you time to build stamina and develop good habits, and it opened up the possibility of choosing to read over being forced to read.

We even showed you extraordinary empathy and patience by studying, through close reading and discussion, the nature of your struggle with akrasia and self-control. That was back in October, and we’ve returned to your need for self-regulation and self-discipline over and over again.

As a class, you’ve recently failed to demonstrate self-control. You’ve failed to follow directions and take advantage of the opportunities given to you. As a result:

  • Your freedom to choose what to read is revoked.
  • The choice-related assignment that was originally due on Wednesday is now null and void.
  • You now have assigned seats and group members.
  • You will not be given Fridays to work on your 20% projects.

You should work on your Pareto Projects on your own time, carving out 20% of your schedule elsewhere. You are still responsible for the project itself.

Instead of your projects, you will now spend every Friday writing an in-class response on the assigned pages from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. You will then type that response over the weekend and submit both the handwritten and typed writing by the beginning of class on Monday. Mondays will still be reserved for sustained, silent reading.

You will still do the reading and writing assignments outlined for Tuesdays and Thursdays. The next two are a narrative response based on an essay, “Learning to Lie,” and a character analysis response based on One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. You will still do silent, individual Regents Exam prep every Wednesday. The only difference will be your assigned seats and groups.

We will update the daily calendar in the next few days to reflect these changes. We will note reading assignments there, too. You may ask questions in the comment section below.

Makerspace FAQ

Classes in the makerspace study literature, write essays, explore essential questions, prepare for English exams, etc., just like any English class would. The difference is an overhauled and interlocking system for instruction, assessment, and feedback.

Like the course itself, this post is based on inquiry. Questions can be asked in the comment section or emailed directly to me (meure@brewsterschools.org), but the list below should help answer almost any question.

With that in mind, this FAQ isn’t structured like a normal FAQ. Instead of questions and answers, you’ll find the means to answer questions. Want to know if a “Humanities makerspace” is in line with the high school’s English Language Arts skills framework? Here is the answer. What about the district’s Strategic Coherence Plan? Covered exhaustively. Wondering how “grade abatement” works? Read the guides and testimonials. Heard that feedback looks different? I’ve included hundreds of examples.

Students in the space learn through direct and online instruction, with ample opportunity to experiment and ask for help. For every other stakeholder, this FAQ is a way to be informed. My goal is 100% transparency about what we do and how effective it is.

Note that the syllabus and orientation links are for AP English Language and Composition. That is because prospective AP students need information on the unique College Board curriculum, since it is implemented with the same fidelity given to the ELA framework and SCP.


Resources


Sisyphean High | Main site for materials, instruction, and online discussion. (You’re on it right now.)
The Humanities Makerspace | Google Site with testimonials, classroom pictures, student work, and much more.

Testimonials | Direct link to testimonials that connect the makerspace to the SCP and ELA skill spiral. Critical for student buy-in.
Engines That Could | Student self-analysis assignment built on the SCP and ELA skill spiral.

Syllabus | Explanation of the makerspace and overview of the AP course.
Course Orientation | Interstitial instructional post that covers the basics for all courses at the beginning of the school year. Updated for 2018-2019.

The GAP Process | Protocol and materials for grade abatement. Explains the entire assessment process. Updated for 2018-2019.
Clarifying Grade Abatement | More perspective on profile-based assessment. Updated for 2018-2019.
Mind the GAP | Unpacks the biggest previous updates to pedagogy in the space. From 2016.

Profiles, Skills, & Traits | Direct link to PDF of the profiles, skills, and traits that drive our learning.

Pre-GAP Triage: Overview | Overview of how exhaustively student data are collected and used in the space. For a direct link to evidence of this: tinyurl.com/gap-triage-218.

The Big Sky | Explanation of how the first quarter of each year is used to build skills that enable us to study content.

The Writing Process | Complete writing process. Built for responses in any genre or mode, but used most frequently for essays. Updated for 2018-2019.
The Reading Process | Complete reading process. Built for any assigned text, but used most frequently for literature. Updated for 2018-2019.

Well, Why Read? | Part of the reading process post. Specifically addresses how literature, nonfiction, and online reading factor into students’ futures.

Reading Calendar | Current schedule of canonical literature in all courses (2019).

The Pareto Project: Complete Guide | Protocol and materials for our Humanities “20 Time” project. Includes links to student work. Updated for 2018-2019.
Pareto Project: FAQ | Set of frequently-asked questions about the Pareto Project.
Pareto Project: Final Self-Assessment | How these “20 Time” projects are assessed in the makerspace.

Molecular Learning | Essay on risk-taking in the makerspace.
The Interstitial Classroom | Essay on the use of technology in the Humanities.
Head Training | One of many essays on the importance of face-to-face work in the makerspace.

Objects in Space | Instructional post about the physical space and how students arrange themselves within it. Includes notes on a mindfulness-based daily check-in form.

Inclusion and Co-Teaching in the Makerspace | Includes screenshots of the feedback process. Informative for students in non-ICT courses, too.

Stakeholder’s Guide | Updated and given directly to parents each year. Useful for all stakeholders, including students. Updated for 2018-2019.

A Better Form of Feedback | Complete overview of how feedback works in the makerspace. Links to other guides.
Mongering and Congeries | One of the links in the above essay. Counters misinformation about the makerspace explicitly and directly.

A Better Kind of Quiz | Overview of quiz-like assessments in the makerspace. Updated for 2018-2019.

Galvanizing Feedback: How to Sisyphean High | Student-generated discussion on how to use the makerspace effectively. Includes more testimonials. Note: In progress as of February 25, 2019.

Twitter: Sisyphean High | Course Twitter account. Used to share student work and course pedagogy with parents and other stakeholders. (Students don’t use Twitter.)

Medium: Sisyphean High | Course Medium account. Used for instructional essays.


How to Use These Resources


Again, it’s about inquiry and exploration, but for prospective students especially:

  1. Don’t read them all.
  2. Read the ones that seem to answer your question or concern.
  3. Read those carefully.
  4. Ask questions.

You can also put your question or concern below, as a comment on this post.

Data, Data Everywhere [English 10, 2/25/19]

Schedule time before March 1 to read this post and apply its data and feedback to yourself. Think of it in terms of interstitial awareness: When and how will you be able to read this most carefully?

Ask any general questions in the comment section at the end of the post.


GAP Q3A Scores


It is critical that you first read this post on pre-GAP triage:

GAP Score Triage: Overview

Then you must find your set of GAP Q3A data in the following spreadsheet:

You can also use type the URL directly: https://tinyurl.com/gap-triage-218. Scores for Q3A will be posted in the morning on February 25.


New Hall Passes


On Friday, February 15, one of the bathroom passes for Room 210 was found on the floor of the cafeteria, which is, as you may have noticed, not the bathroom. We’d already lost a pass or two this year to that sort of abuse, so you’ll now be signing out and back in every time you leave the room.

If you take too long, go too often, wander down to the cafeteria, or in any other way abuse the privilege, you lose that privilege.


No More Phones


December saw the first moratorium on phones:

Moratorium

Phones can be learning tools, though, or so the thinking goes. In January, we went back to student choice and self-control (again), and you were allowed to use phones and other personal devices in the makerspace.

Starting February 26 — on Tuesday, so you have Monday to make peace with the change — you’ll be prohibited from using your phones in the makerspace. The negative impact on your learning far outweighs the benefits.

You might want to read this to understand why the ban is necessary:

I will sort out individual access as necessary. Anticipate putting your phone in the holder in the corner, or accept that one of your teachers will take the phone to administration.


Spreadsheet Specifics


You should read the triage post and look over the spreadsheet first.

Total Check-In %

These numbers are based on the maximum possible “Daily Check-In” responses from November 17 through February 14. Absences and individual circumstances were taken into account after the fact on a case-by-case basis.

These percentages also ignore the content of those responses; instead, we are using them as reference points for habit-building and compliance. They are part of a bigger picture, like everything else.

Learning By Doing

This will get its own lesson, post, and discussion at some point.

The basic idea is that the more you, the student, do on your end, the more you learn. The work teaches you without the need for constant correction and redirection. When the assignments, texts, questions, etc., are done sincerely and thoughtfully, the doing is often enough. Hence the 0/1/2 scale on a triage spreadsheet like this.

That scale is there to tell you, after the fact and in conjunction with a GAP score, “No, you didn’t do enough.” Find the folks who wrote a lot for the ETA podcast assignment, for instance. Their work taught them through the way they did it. Others would be recorded as a “2” mostly out of kindness, but they definitely didn’t learn a lot from the writing — it’s a couple of sentences, if that, and obviously not enough to construct real meaning.

You get out of this what you put in. That’s the key to learning. You are given lessons that teach you by making you the agent of change. It’s not just about being corrected and redirected and so on. You explore and think in writing, and while helpful correction always comes in person, in class, in face-to-face meetings, etc., the habits and understandings that last longest happen through the work itself.

It’s a better form of feedback. When you don’t complete the assignment sincerely and thoughtfully, it doesn’t work. For you. It’s on you, then, to put in your best effort each time.


Update: Reading Calendar [Assignment Notes]


This assignment is on the post-panel proof-of-process pre-GAP spreadsheet as “Update: Reading Calendar.” It required only a single click. You had to indicate that you read the update by marking the assignment as done. Look at the directions in Google Classroom: “Let us know that you read the post.”

That’s it. Click a button. Let us know. Look at the spreadsheet, and note how many folks didn’t do that. Whether it was an oversight, an indication that they didn’t read the update, or disengagement, the takeaway is the same: You have to get better at organization. You might want to revisit that unit from the beginning of the year:

Organization: Getting Things Done


Regents Students: Overall Feedback on Q3A


https://tinyurl.com/gap-anchors | Load that document. Review at the descriptions on pages two and three. When you’re done, look at your assignments on Google Classroom for Q3A.

Here is a comment that could have been applied to many students:

Read both the student’s thoughts and my response. Then read a similar exchange with a different student:

Both students feel that directions, deadlines, and expectations are unclear. That feeling is important, because we need to work together to alleviate it. It is not a feeling based on fact, however.

There absolutely are deadlines. They are clear and consistent deadlines. Here is a student from the same Regents class as the previous two:

 

Note the time stamps for my responses. My feedback for these three students was within the same ten-minute window on Saturday, February 16. Here is another student in the same class, less than ten minutes later:

This student is using the idea of “External Artifacts” to take responsibility for missing work, because they know how clear and consistent the expectations have been. Rather than make excuses, they’ve embraced the empathy and flexibility at the heart of the course.

It’s also important to note that you have several days to write a paragraph like that about some element of your grade abatement profile. Here is what is possible in just 25 minutes of focused writing:

Again, read the student’s response and my feedback. This is a student is “focused and productive,” despite “a very large class with the potential to distract”; since every Regents class in the space this year is large, that could be said for all focused and productive students.

This student’s response is also honest. That’s why we focus so much on the Dunning-Kruger effect and the fear of being honest that holds students back. That last student has the following row in the post-panel proof-of-process pre-GAP spreadsheet:

That is exactly what they describe in their paragraph. That’s why they are a 90 in Infinite Campus: self-awareness, amenability, integrity, and overall consistency.


Practice Regents Exam (Aug. ‘16) [Assignment Notes]


First, a review of how we got here. On January 3, you were given this post:

Regents Exam Practice: August, 2016

On January 7, through Castle Learning, you were assigned the following:

  1. 8/16 Practice: Part 1 – Passage A
  2. 8/16 Practice: Part 1 – Passage B
  3. 8/16 Practice: Part 1 – Passage C
  4. 8/16 Practice: Part 2
  5. 8/16 Practice: Part 3

We dedicated class time to each assignment, and then extended the deadlines for each section of the exam to February 15, which was the day before your February break.

The metacognitive or reflective prompts attached to each section of the exam were generously assessed as sufficient or insufficient according to this standard:

Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work

We left feedback where and when we could, prompted you repeatedly to return to incomplete assignments, and so on.

Load the GAP triage spreadsheet, and scroll over to the English 10 tab. The practice Regents Exam has its own section in your sheet. Before I paste in a copy of that spreadsheet, two note:

  • Part 1 multiple-choice scores with yellow shading reflect incomplete task (questions left unanswered), not a total score.
  • Essay scores of 0 in red reflect missing work (no attempt at a response at all), not a low content score.

As we explained in class, the least important part of exam prep is your score; it’s far more important that you understand how to improve, how to help others, and so on.

Here is a screenshot of roughly half of the total students in English 10:

Let’s talk about what this means.

Rewards and Incentives

If you earned an 85 or higher on the practice Regents Exam we did between January 7 and February 15 — five weeks or so — and you did the majority of the all-important metacognitive analysis, then congratulations are in order: You don’t have to do any more Regents Exam prep this year.

That includes the otherwise required work on exemplars and rubrics, all of which will be assigned in late February and March. You did well enough with the test and the required self-analysis that further test prep is not necessary.

If you earned between a 70 and an 85, you’ll be asked to redo the section with your lowest score. It will depend also on how much of the all-important metacognitive analysis you completed. You’ll also need to work on some, if not all, of the exemplar and rubric assignments.

If you’re below 70, you need practice, either in following directions and meeting expectations, or in the core skills of the test itself.

Depending on how low the score is, we’ll be folding in lots of exam-related practice to boost your skills. You’ll definitely be completing all of the exemplar and rubric assignments — that’s a great way to see what the state expects, and one of the fastest ways to improve written responses. Otherwise, we are going to individualize the work based on your scores and the quality of your self-analysis.

A scale score of 65, for instance, might just mean that you need to redo the section with your lowest score. You might need extra attention on the exemplars, and we’ll look closely at the quality of your metacognition.

Failing scores, of course, indicate the need for more support. Don’t worry! Again, the least important part of exam prep is your score; it’s far more important that you understand how to improve. We have plenty of assignments that will help you. We’ll make sure you do lots of self-analysis and reflection, too, including a special focus on the rubrics and exemplars.

For those students who really struggled and have scores at the bottom of the scale — 31, 27, 6, and so on — there is obviously cause for concern. Don’t beat yourself up, though. Test-taking is a skill. You’ll just need to keep practicing.

Fortunately, we’ll keep giving you chances to improve. That might mean that you have to give up a Pareto Project Friday or in-class reading day to finish another practice test, but the Regents Exam is something you must pass to graduate. That was the purpose of this diagnostic — to show us where the greatest needs are.


GAP Q3A Starts the Ending


With all that in mind, you have to start thinking in Regents English about getting credit for the year, passing the final exam, etc., because some of you are closing in on the point of no return.

We’re going to try to slow down. You’re still going to have to make good choices, pay attention to directions, etc., but we’re going to go as slowly as we possibly can. You must

  1. follow all directions exactly;
  2. meet all deadlines, unless explicitly told otherwise;
  3. use all individual and general feedback to improve; and
  4. stay focused each and every day in class.

If you don’t know what to do after reading this post, start with a review of what it means to do enough work to get credit:

Insufficient vs. Sufficient Work

Ask general questions in the comment section below.

Makerspace Reading Calendar: 2018-2019

Here is a printable Google Doc with this information: https://tinyurl.com/ycep9emy


Background: Instructional Posts


These are embedded, in order, after the list.

  • The Reading Process | Covers everything.
  • As You Read: Works of Literary Merit | One version of the analysis process. An updated version is here: https://tinyurl.com/simplifiedanalysis.
  • Choosing to Read: Directions | Covers assigned texts versus student-chosen texts.
  • Literary Analysis Guide | Another version of the analysis process.

The Reading Process

As You Read: Works of Literary Merit

Choosing to Read [2018]

Literary Analysis Guide


Background: Course Syllabi


Each syllabus covers reading goals for the course in full. A note on AP English Language & Composition follows that embedded syllabus.

AP Language follows the reading requirements from the College Board, which are available here: tinyurl.com/210APCB. The most relevant section is this one:

Language & Composition is explicitly focused on a different kind of reading. Canonical literature isn’t excluded, but traditional analysis is discouraged. Nevertheless, the makerspace so strongly emphasizes literature as an aesthetic experience that exceptions must be made. See the course orientation and Ken Robinson’s “Changing Education Paradigms” video for more on this.


Makerspace Reading Lists: 2018-2019


The makerspace shifts us away from mandated reading and toward literary merit and student choice. One of the essential texts in the prefatory reading is John Holt’s “How Teachers Make Children Hate Reading,” which we use to frame that choice:

I don’t want you to feel that just because you start a book, you have to finish it. Give an author thirty or forty pages or so to get his story going. Then if you don’t like the characters and don’t care what happens to them, close the book, put it away, and get another. I don’t care whether the books are easy or hard, short or long, as long as you enjoy them.

As the “Choosing to Read” instructional post says, students navigate the first 30-40 pages of a novel in order to make that decision. Each time, we use a specific protocol to learn more about how students read, what that means for their learning, and where the threshold lies between challenging their habits and forcing the issue until something breaks.

Ultimately, students decide between the assigned book (e.g., 1984, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest) and another work of equal literary merit. They must read a book. They are encouraged to stick with the assigned one; the choice, however, is theirs.

We then focus on skills, traits, and the common experiences that all works of literary merit provide us. There are no quizzes and no tests. Literature is used in essays when it is appropriate in a real-world sense, or when we must do test prep.

Otherwise, literature is used to teach the reader. Reading gives us life experience, wisdom, and empathy. It also teaches students something about how they read, which is essential to how they learn.

The assured experience is in the skills and traits developed by reading, the discussions that don’t depend just on plot points, and the metacognitive and reflective work that drives growth.

Reading Calendar: First Semester (2018-2019)

My co-teachers and I built the course calendar in September: tinyurl.com/210-2018-cal. For all classes, the Pareto Projects and GAP scoring dates stay the same. Each quarter is divided into panels, like a triptych, with different kinds of literature assigned during each panel.

Here is a post explaining the use of Q1 as a skill-building crash course:

The Big Sky

Through the first semester, a variety of literature and other texts were studied:

Q2 ends with every course having studied a book according to the makerspace protocol, which includes, of course, doing close-reading exercises on prescribed excerpts, discussing thematic elements, and practicing literary analysis.

There are additionally several posts that combat misinformation and disinformation about the makerspace approach to literature. Here is one:

Mongering and Congeries

Here is another that focuses specifically on reading:

Well, Why Read?

Reading Calendar: Second Semester (2018-2019)

Up next will be three full-length books or plays in each course, in addition to short fiction, non-fiction, and poetry.

Below (or in the printable version of this post), you can see the major texts cross two GAP panels each, with around 30 class periods available to us during those two panels. This is more than enough time to introduce the literature, begin the reading process, and then make the student-driven choice to continue or to choose a work of equal literary merit.

Each class will keep test prep and the required essays in place, of course, as well as the Pareto Projects and other project-based learning opportunities (like the ongoing NPR Student Podcast Challenge).

Note that the listed texts are provisional. It might be that we decide that Othello is a better play for English 10, for instance, since it is taught in other English 10 classes. We might move up our study of The Catcher in the Rye in English 11 to partner up with other junior classes, too. We are using some of the most commonly taught books in the English Department in order to create assured experiences.

Note on the overlap between English 11 and AP English Language & Composition:

English 11 and AP English Language & Composition are taught some of the same canonical texts. They are also given some of the same essay prompts, including junior-year staples like the personal narrative. This is because AP English Language & Composition, while open to juniors and seniors, is practically and provisionally a junior-level course.

In 2008-2009, it was officially called English 11 AP. In 2009-2010, the course lost its lab periods, dropped the 11, and opened up enrollment to seniors. Since then, 553 students have taken the course. Exactly 20 (or 3%) have been seniors. Over the last four years, sections of AP English Language & Composition have had an average of 29 students. The only three seniors enrolled during that time are all from 2018-2019. The average number of seniors in any section in the last ten years is 0.8 — less than a single student. Juniors take AP English Literature and Composition; seniors do not take AP English Language and Composition.

NPR Student Podcast Challenge

Update for Students: You were overwhelmingly in favor of spending time on this podcast challenge, so it has been folded into all classes. Formal assignments have been added to Google Classroom. You will not be required to produce a complete podcast, nor will you have to enter the contest. Instead, you will have three required assignments: to analyze example podcasts, to gather potential ideas, and to answer six questions about one of those ideas. All of the surrounding information from NPR is critical, of course (click this link for an example), but you will be working more explicitly through the following:

The current deadline for all this is January 25. Let’s revisit that deadline on a class-by-class basis next week.


The Challenge


We’re a makerspace, which means we make things. Sometimes, those artifacts are inspired by people and organizations outside of our walls. Case in point:

This podcast challenge is a ready-made makerspace unit. It requires you to analyze existing podcasts to figure out how to emulate them. It requires all of our universal skills and traits. In fact, if you look through the student resources NPR has provided, you’ll see a mention of a “toolbox” in the first step:

That’s not just a tremendous example of how those universal skills and traits work in the real world; it’s also remarkably similar to a 20 Time or Pareto Project.


The Calendar


Speaking of your Pareto Projects, this is timed well for us. Look at the calendar for the year:

As I write this, we are in between Pareto Projects. February 25 is set aside as the start of the next process. NPR’s podcast challenge ends on March 31. That overlap gives us a unique opportunity:

  • We work on the podcast challenge once a week or so through the February break.
  • In Q3B, which runs from February 25 through March 15, you continue the podcast challenge or begin a new Pareto Project.
  • If you continue the podcast, you will finish and submit it by Friday, March 29.
  • In that case, you would begin a smaller Pareto Project on Monday, April 1.

Projects are meant to be presented from May 28 through June 14, which is the last Friday we meet together. There is, therefore, more than enough time for you to create a podcast and a second, meaningful Pareto Project.

Let’s start with your feedback: What do you think of this podcast challenge? After looking at NPR’s website, are you inspired by the possibilities? How do you think this would fit our space? Talk to me in the comments, where your peers can benefit from the exchange.

Notes on Your Progress


Provisional GAP Scores


Before you move into the silent, sustained reading that will occupy your time for the next few class periods, be sure that you’ve seen the update to Infinite Campus. Load that in a separate window, if you need to. Take a look at what we’ve posted under GAP2C: Q2C Profile.

This is a provisional profile score. Provisional, as you know from this post on the provisional moratorium on cell phones, means “temporary, precautionary” — so this is a score for the time being, and one that is designed to warn you. We’ve used provisional scores before.

This particular score represents the appropriate profile for your work on January 2 and January 3. It includes the progress you’ve made toward revising your Pareto Project self-assessments, which were due over the break, and the progress you’ve made toward analyzing a short story through the provided handout. It also reflects your in-class focus and feedback, as always.

First, consider the self-assessment of your Pareto Project. Take a look at this:

Pareto Projects: Final Self-Assessment

That was posted on December 7, after three months of weekly work on a project of your choosing. The timeline and background are reposted there, but the central assignment is the two-part self-assessment. You had three weeks to write insightfully about what you learned. As it says there, on Google Classroom, and on the printed copies of the assignment:

It is being posted now [on December 7] so that you can organize the next two weeks around this kind of thinking. You must pay attention to yourself and your peers as we share the results of your Pareto process. This assignment is how you derive insight from that attentiveness, and it will help you set up the next passion-driven project you do.

When you came back on January 2, you were given a second chance to do this right. Three months of work, three weeks to think critically — and then another three days to provide some insight.

Here’s the data we have that led us to post a provisional GAP score. First, we have when you most recently accessed the required Google document. We can record the students who didn’t touch their work for two days. We can see each iteration and revision.

We also have the Google Form, which tracks entries and edits. We know who didn’t touch that for two days. We can see the extent to which you were working.

And we have whatever else you produced between December 7 and, now, January 3: all the documents, feedback, notes, etc., that you gave us, we compiled through observations, and so on.

The same thing goes for the revamped version of your short-story analysis. That was due on December 21:

English 11: Narrative Writing + Literary Analysis

It was posted on December 10. We bumped the final, emulative exercise — the writing of your own story — to Q2C:

A simplified worksheet, time in class to do it, and the option to write your own story or use a provided one.

We can also see what you accessed on 1/2 and 1/3 for this assignment. We can see what you typed. We can document that only 11 students opened up the new document to work on it over two days, and we observed only three students write by hand on the printed version. We can even see how many people view the instructional posts.

We’re waiting to give you feedback, too. If you write anything all, we can help. Case in point:

It is irrelevant to this feedback that the deadline for this short story analysis is tomorrow. Our course is always about the process — about a process-based form of feedback and focus on growth. It’s about what you do, each and every day, not whether you might be able to — might be able to — rush through an assignment at the last minute and do it well. It’s about every choice you make, and how, sometimes, those choices show us a sudden and clear picture of who you are:

Dürer’s Rhinoceros

We watched you gossip, play games, scroll social media, etc., every time we moved to help another individual or group. Some of you, at least, chose not to work. And we’ve been over this: You always have something to do. Today, a few hard-working students had finished their work, so they were asked to read this and give us some feedback:

Clarifying Grade Abatement

You also had feedback to process from January 2. GAP scores for Q2B were held in abeyance until we’d talked face-to-face on our first day back. Those scores, too, are powerful indicators of what you need to improve immediately, and you are always meant to unpack and process them.

Hence these provisional GAP scores. With enough hard work, you can improve them. Growth is rewarded. Self-awareness is rewarded. Amenability is rewarded. Focus on that.

If you have general questions, ask them below, where we can answer them for everyone’s benefit. If you have a question about your individual circumstances, send us an email or speak to one of us in class.

Feedback: Improve the Learning Environment

From one perspective, this is a gamified environment. There are levels, and you can progress through those levels in many different ways. You earn experience (in the gamification sense and in the academic sense) by accomplishing set tasks. To succeed, you must dodge environmental hazards and avoid other elements that damage you.

That’s why the Pareto Projects work as well as they do: Students aren’t graded on them, but the best projects are evidence of the skills, traits, and knowledge that are found in the strongest profiles. Investment in the project is an investment in the process of the project, which is really an investment in gaining meaningful experience.

Pareto Projects are also among the best opportunities to level up collegiality and empathy, which remain the most important facet of your learning. Peer-to-peer feedback is an essential part of what we do in a Humanities makerspace:

View at Medium.com

Here, then, is a post about a few of the most direct ways to generate evidence of peer-to-peer feedback. And it is fine if you look at this as a way to game the system to earn credit. Even if your motivation is less than pure, the net result is positive. That’s the design, at least: You can’t cheat the system, and “faking” your investment still helps others. That idea is explained in the tenth section of an essay on an earlier (but still relevant) iteration of the makerspace:

When you are in doubt, fake it. Force yourself to be collegial. Force yourself to do metacognition. Force yourself to spend the entire period pretending to be the right kind of student.

Do this for long enough, and the skills and traits you are pretending to hone will be honed. You will become a better student. This is the Wiseman effect transposed onto education. It is a kind of psychosomatic inverse: tricking your brain into developing habits by forcing your body to take particular actions.

In here, it’s fine if you try to game the system by generating whatever evidence it takes to justify that GAP 8 or GAP 9. Why? Because there is no gamesmanship — no way to cheat the system, fabricate evidence, or twist the language of the profiles. There isn’t even a way to cheat yourself.

If you force yourself through the motions in here, those motions will inculcate the skills and traits we want. A misanthrope who forces himself to take collegial and galvanizing actions will incrementally learn empathy. A narcissist who forces herself to reflect and metacogitate every week will incrementally find new self-awareness and insight. An apathetic student who grinds through assignments just to get them done will incrementally gain a real appreciation for the value of the work.

This is a subtle conversion. It evades the entitlement at the heart of both helplessness and arrogance. The helpless among you feel entitled to be shepherded from task to task; the arrogant among you overvalue your intelligence and devalue the good work of this course. Both groups anticipate being gifted a high grade through some kind of alchemical magic.

The logic of this course is immutable, however. There is no game to play and no gamesmanship to lean on. This course does not care how naturally gifted you are. It does not care if you play sports and play them well. It does not care what your parents think of you. It does not care what you look like, how charming you are, or how much latitude you have been given throughout your life to do what you want.

It cares only about what you do.

I think I’d add now, a few years later, that I care about all of the things listed in the penultimate paragraph. As a teacher and human being, I care. But the course has a logic to it that focuses purely on what you do. You can force yourself to give effective feedback, and it doesn’t matter, provisionally, if you are intrinsically motivated. As long as it’s effective feedback — that is, not perfunctory, superficial, vague — the eventual effect is the same.


Galvanic Work: GAP 8


The first and second page of this PDF cover the top tier of profiles:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F12%2FGrade-Abatement-Tier-Guide.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

That’s a new iteration of the guide to the profiles. Here is a screenshot of the anchor profile, which is the profile for a GAP 8:

And here, again, one of the many explanations for how this tier works:

Probably the most important requirement of the highest profiles is a feedback loop — an individualized academic connection with the teacher, the materials of the course, and your peers. There are four main ways to do this:

  1. You can learn directly from the teacher in small groups or as an individual.
  2. You can learn directly from folks who’ve done #1.
  3. You can interact thoughtfully with the interstitial instruction of the course.
  4. You can learn directly from folks who’ve done #3.

Learning from an expert peer is nearly as effective as conferencing with the teacher, and it more closely emulates what you’ll need to do throughout your life, which is to read and annotate and think about the writing of others without a teacher standing over your shoulder. Mentorship should be something you seek out, especially as you get older, but it’s not always a given. Collaboration is.

The burden is evenly distributed, too. Once you have learned something meaningful or mastered a skill, you need to teach it to others. That is known as the protégé effect, and it is almost universally accepted as the best way to hone skills and retain knowledge. In this course, we also call it proxy feedback.

That is another key criterion for the highest profiles: evidence that you have contributed to the learning environment. After that, it’s about the other most effective way to learn, which is to think about your thinking — to get to know yourself and your choices through regular reflection and metacognition.

This should all be done through a mix of discussion and writing, and it needs to be insightful and consistent. Throughout the learning process, you should be using the right language — the universal language of grade abatement.


Peer-to-Peer Feedback


Which brings us to what you do now. You are reading this because it is helpful to have direction when you give feedback to a peer. A template is useful. Sometimes, sentence starters are useful. You can default to this worksheet, which comes from collaboration with Mrs. Greenfeld, who runs the other makerspace at the high school. Here’s a PDF of it:

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F12%2FFeedback_-Glow-Grow.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]

 

As you can see in the file name, this is adapted from the “glow and grow” model of reflection and assessment. The key is the use of sentence starters. It also helps to have the blurb at the top of each feedback section. Because we are grade-abated, we can use Tony Wagner’s idea of “collective human judgment informed by evidence.” The feedback, again, is the key, not a score.

You have a number of options for giving peer-to-peer feedback. Written feedback has lasting power, so focus there — not because face-to-face feedback is unimportant, because it is so important that it happens naturally. If you are talking in class after a project presentation, for instance, feedback will happen. You could use this template to help you be more specific in your feedback, but it’s in the written feedback that it really shines.

Some options:

  1. Leave feedback on the artifact, if possible. Add comments through Google Docs, Slides, Sheets, etc., if you’ve been given permission to do so.
  2. Make a copy of the artifact, if it’s available but not open to comments, and leave comments on that copy. Then send the annotated copy back to the original owner.
  3. Write a response offering positive and constructive feedback, and then email it to your peer.
  4. Send brief but specific feedback through social media.
  5. Leave comments on any teacher-created version of the artifact, like the Pareto Project pages posted online.

Building Evidence


Here is the most important part of the process, at least in terms of quasi-traditional assessment: You want evidence of your feedback. Look again at the anchoring language of the Tier 4 profiles:

To “demonstrably improve the learning environment,” in this context, means to demonstrate that you gave effective feedback. Again, the gamesmanship of this is built into the system, and there is no harm at all in being somewhat extrinsically motivated. You need evidence of your hard work for the GAP process:

The GAP Process

What does that mean? It means that you are putting feedback in writing not just to make it more permanent, and not just to allow for more thoughtfulness in its construction; you are also preserving copies of that feedback for your records. You can take pictures of handwritten feedback and screenshots of typed feedback. You can make copies of emails and other direct addresses.

Most critically, you can write about the feedback. Be metacognitive about what you said and how you said it. Reflect on your use of sentence starters, since those really do help, and on how the conversation developed. It should be a conversation, after all; delivering feedback with no follow-up is much less effective than a discussion about the work.

Ask questions about this below.

Moratorium

Starting Wednesday, December 12, there will be a moratorium in our classroom on the use of any all devices (e.g., phones, tablets) except district-issued Chromebooks and personal laptops. There will also be a moratorium on choosing your own seats1.

We’ll review this together — hands-on, with liberal use of a whiteboard to define and detail certain points — but you may have questions or comments that require an interstitial forum like this one. Remember, too, that this site is for all stakeholders, not just students. Our conversation about technology is an inclusive one.

The most important note is probably this: moratorium refers to a pause or delay in action. It’s a temporary suspension. It isn’t a permanent ban. The second most important note is that you can be part of the conversation about technology use and learning. Start in the comment section here by asking questions, making observations, etc., so that I can reply to you.


Moratorium on Phones


Since smartphones are the most common distraction, “phone” is a placeholder for any device except district-issued Chromebooks or personal laptops.

If you want context for this moratorium, you’ll find it in the unit we did on self-control and self-discipline:

The Return of the Fatal Flying Guillotine

Self-control is one of the most important skills you can develop, so we’ve used the flexibility of the makerspace to give you opportunities to test your focus and discipline. Many students failed those tests.

That’s okay, at least in a larger sense. The purpose of that akrasia unit is, in part, to normalize the problem as a decidedly human one. In other words, we all struggle with self-control, distraction, procrastination, etc., and we all need to improve.

In a more immediate sense, we have to get these phones out of students’ hands. There are, of course, academic reasons to have a phone, and this site is designed to be read on the smaller screens. But those academic reasons continue outside of school. You’d use your phone interstitially, as intended, when you are making the choice to learn, create, question, etc., in an academic sense.

In class, the phone is too much of a distraction. We’ve tested it for three months now, and the rate of improvement is too slow. I imagine that this moratorium will remain in place for a long time.


Assigned Seats


The context for assigned seats:

Objects in Space

All we’re doing now is keeping you in those start-of-period assigned seats until the bell. You need the separation to get work done. We’ll obviously make exceptions when it comes to group projects, but this is otherwise about isolating you from distractions.

It needs to be clarified that collaboration is the stuff of growth, which is why we start the year there; simply being in a group, however, is not proof of collaboration. Being in proximity to other students is just being in proximity to them. Collaboration refers to what you produce. When members of our group fail to stay on task in their chosen groups, it helps to assign seats.


We Have Work to Do


All of this is predicated on the obvious: You have work to do. You are in a makerspace, and that means there is always more work to do. Even that last link proves its own point, because it would take a while to read that entire lecture and process its ideas.

Right now, as the winter holidays approach, you need to be more focused than ever. In every course, the end of your first Pareto Project process requires the following:

Pareto Projects: Final Self-Assessment

Meanwhile, English 10 students are writing personal letters, English 11 students are analyzing and writing short stories, and AP students are applying the makerspace mentality to Santa Claus. This is perhaps the worst time of year to lose focus.

Below is the version of our grade abatement profiles that was affixed to each workstation earlier this week. The color-coded tiers may help you to maintain focus. You shift into the red by ignoring directions and disengaging from the work, and the more you resist, the more you build evidence of those lower tiers. In other words, refusing to focus, especially in the particular way you are being directed to focus, is enough by itself to lower your profile and grade.

[pdfjs-viewer url=”http%3A%2F%2Fsisypheanhigh.com%2Fmalachite%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F12%2FGAP-Color-Arial.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=600px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]


  1. With the possible exception of the AP classes. This is based on group dynamics, which is really about a kind of herd immunity, and AP students have earned a few days to prove they have the requisite discipline to choose their own seats. The moratorium on phones applies to everyone, though, which says something about the addiction we’re dealing with.